Buying time: Real and hypothetical offers

V. Kerry Smith, Carol Mansfield

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

38 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article provides the results of a field test of contingent valuation estimates within a willingness to accept framework. Using dichotomous choice questions in telephone-mail-telephone interviews, we compare survey respondents' responses to real and hypothetical offers for the opportunity to spend time in a second set of interviews on an undisclosed topic. Five hundred and forty people were randomly split between the real and hypothetical treatments. Our findings indicate no significant differences between people's choices with real and hypothetical offers. Choice models were not significantly different between real and hypothetical offers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)209-224
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Environmental Economics and Management
Volume36
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1998
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

contingent valuation
test
Telephone
Dichotomous choice
Willingness to accept
Choice models
Contingent valuation

Keywords

  • Contingent value
  • Experiment
  • Real and hypothetical offer
  • Willingness to accept

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

Buying time : Real and hypothetical offers. / Smith, V. Kerry; Mansfield, Carol.

In: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol. 36, No. 3, 11.1998, p. 209-224.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Smith, V. Kerry ; Mansfield, Carol. / Buying time : Real and hypothetical offers. In: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 1998 ; Vol. 36, No. 3. pp. 209-224.
@article{7c8b7f71a57d4c5a92afdb6f39297a3b,
title = "Buying time: Real and hypothetical offers",
abstract = "This article provides the results of a field test of contingent valuation estimates within a willingness to accept framework. Using dichotomous choice questions in telephone-mail-telephone interviews, we compare survey respondents' responses to real and hypothetical offers for the opportunity to spend time in a second set of interviews on an undisclosed topic. Five hundred and forty people were randomly split between the real and hypothetical treatments. Our findings indicate no significant differences between people's choices with real and hypothetical offers. Choice models were not significantly different between real and hypothetical offers.",
keywords = "Contingent value, Experiment, Real and hypothetical offer, Willingness to accept",
author = "Smith, {V. Kerry} and Carol Mansfield",
year = "1998",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1006/jeem.1998.1049",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "209--224",
journal = "Journal of Environmental Economics and Management",
issn = "0095-0696",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Buying time

T2 - Real and hypothetical offers

AU - Smith, V. Kerry

AU - Mansfield, Carol

PY - 1998/11

Y1 - 1998/11

N2 - This article provides the results of a field test of contingent valuation estimates within a willingness to accept framework. Using dichotomous choice questions in telephone-mail-telephone interviews, we compare survey respondents' responses to real and hypothetical offers for the opportunity to spend time in a second set of interviews on an undisclosed topic. Five hundred and forty people were randomly split between the real and hypothetical treatments. Our findings indicate no significant differences between people's choices with real and hypothetical offers. Choice models were not significantly different between real and hypothetical offers.

AB - This article provides the results of a field test of contingent valuation estimates within a willingness to accept framework. Using dichotomous choice questions in telephone-mail-telephone interviews, we compare survey respondents' responses to real and hypothetical offers for the opportunity to spend time in a second set of interviews on an undisclosed topic. Five hundred and forty people were randomly split between the real and hypothetical treatments. Our findings indicate no significant differences between people's choices with real and hypothetical offers. Choice models were not significantly different between real and hypothetical offers.

KW - Contingent value

KW - Experiment

KW - Real and hypothetical offer

KW - Willingness to accept

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032211530&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032211530&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1006/jeem.1998.1049

DO - 10.1006/jeem.1998.1049

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0032211530

VL - 36

SP - 209

EP - 224

JO - Journal of Environmental Economics and Management

JF - Journal of Environmental Economics and Management

SN - 0095-0696

IS - 3

ER -