Business strategy and top management compensation: The mediating effects of employment risk, firm performance and size

Rajaram Veliyath, Stephen P. Ferris, Kannan Ramaswamy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We compare top management compensation among prospector, defender, and analyzer strategic types, and the effects of differences in managers' employment risks, firm performance, and firm size. Prospectors performed better and they paid their top management group more than did analyzers. They were also bigger, their managers faced more employment risks, and they paid their CEOs more than did defenders or analyzers. Significant differences were found among the three strategic types in managers' employment risks, firm performance, and size. On average, the strategic types whose managers faced greater employment risks also compensated their top management group more, providing evidence of a positive relationship between risk and return at the level of strategic types. Confirming previous findings, firm size constituted the greatest influence on top management compensation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)149-159
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Business Research
Volume30
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1994
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Mediating effect
Firm performance
Management compensation
Firm size
Business strategy
Strategy management
Managers
Strategic types
Top management
Chief executive officer
Risk and return

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Marketing
  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

Business strategy and top management compensation : The mediating effects of employment risk, firm performance and size. / Veliyath, Rajaram; Ferris, Stephen P.; Ramaswamy, Kannan.

In: Journal of Business Research, Vol. 30, No. 2, 1994, p. 149-159.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ce946c0be3e540729321c1d40f91565f,
title = "Business strategy and top management compensation: The mediating effects of employment risk, firm performance and size",
abstract = "We compare top management compensation among prospector, defender, and analyzer strategic types, and the effects of differences in managers' employment risks, firm performance, and firm size. Prospectors performed better and they paid their top management group more than did analyzers. They were also bigger, their managers faced more employment risks, and they paid their CEOs more than did defenders or analyzers. Significant differences were found among the three strategic types in managers' employment risks, firm performance, and size. On average, the strategic types whose managers faced greater employment risks also compensated their top management group more, providing evidence of a positive relationship between risk and return at the level of strategic types. Confirming previous findings, firm size constituted the greatest influence on top management compensation.",
author = "Rajaram Veliyath and Ferris, {Stephen P.} and Kannan Ramaswamy",
year = "1994",
doi = "10.1016/0148-2963(94)90034-5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "149--159",
journal = "Journal of Business Research",
issn = "0148-2963",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Business strategy and top management compensation

T2 - The mediating effects of employment risk, firm performance and size

AU - Veliyath, Rajaram

AU - Ferris, Stephen P.

AU - Ramaswamy, Kannan

PY - 1994

Y1 - 1994

N2 - We compare top management compensation among prospector, defender, and analyzer strategic types, and the effects of differences in managers' employment risks, firm performance, and firm size. Prospectors performed better and they paid their top management group more than did analyzers. They were also bigger, their managers faced more employment risks, and they paid their CEOs more than did defenders or analyzers. Significant differences were found among the three strategic types in managers' employment risks, firm performance, and size. On average, the strategic types whose managers faced greater employment risks also compensated their top management group more, providing evidence of a positive relationship between risk and return at the level of strategic types. Confirming previous findings, firm size constituted the greatest influence on top management compensation.

AB - We compare top management compensation among prospector, defender, and analyzer strategic types, and the effects of differences in managers' employment risks, firm performance, and firm size. Prospectors performed better and they paid their top management group more than did analyzers. They were also bigger, their managers faced more employment risks, and they paid their CEOs more than did defenders or analyzers. Significant differences were found among the three strategic types in managers' employment risks, firm performance, and size. On average, the strategic types whose managers faced greater employment risks also compensated their top management group more, providing evidence of a positive relationship between risk and return at the level of strategic types. Confirming previous findings, firm size constituted the greatest influence on top management compensation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38149146715&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=38149146715&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0148-2963(94)90034-5

DO - 10.1016/0148-2963(94)90034-5

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:38149146715

VL - 30

SP - 149

EP - 159

JO - Journal of Business Research

JF - Journal of Business Research

SN - 0148-2963

IS - 2

ER -