Bureaucratic Red Tape and Formalization

Untangling Conceptual Knots

Barry Bozeman, Patrick Scott

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

65 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Advancements in our knowledge of red tape have been handicapped by a serious neglect in the development of red tape as an organizational concept. Progress has also been hindered by the rather haphazard application of this concept in much of the empirical research. In this paper we examine some of the principal factors that have impeded conceptual development, paying particular attention to the relationship between red tape and bureaucratic formalization. We argue that progress in red-tape research and knowledge requires attention to several issues, including the measurement of red tape, origins and sources of red tape, and the need to consider red tape from the perspective of multiple stakeholders.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-17
Number of pages17
JournalAmerican Review of Public Administration
Volume26
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1996
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

formalization
handicapped
neglect
empirical research
stakeholder
Red tape
Formalization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Public Administration
  • Marketing

Cite this

Bureaucratic Red Tape and Formalization : Untangling Conceptual Knots. / Bozeman, Barry; Scott, Patrick.

In: American Review of Public Administration, Vol. 26, No. 1, 1996, p. 1-17.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{aa50afd29d554f3a94aaf16726c26a54,
title = "Bureaucratic Red Tape and Formalization: Untangling Conceptual Knots",
abstract = "Advancements in our knowledge of red tape have been handicapped by a serious neglect in the development of red tape as an organizational concept. Progress has also been hindered by the rather haphazard application of this concept in much of the empirical research. In this paper we examine some of the principal factors that have impeded conceptual development, paying particular attention to the relationship between red tape and bureaucratic formalization. We argue that progress in red-tape research and knowledge requires attention to several issues, including the measurement of red tape, origins and sources of red tape, and the need to consider red tape from the perspective of multiple stakeholders.",
author = "Barry Bozeman and Patrick Scott",
year = "1996",
doi = "10.1177/027507409602600101",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "1--17",
journal = "American Review of Public Administration",
issn = "0275-0740",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bureaucratic Red Tape and Formalization

T2 - Untangling Conceptual Knots

AU - Bozeman, Barry

AU - Scott, Patrick

PY - 1996

Y1 - 1996

N2 - Advancements in our knowledge of red tape have been handicapped by a serious neglect in the development of red tape as an organizational concept. Progress has also been hindered by the rather haphazard application of this concept in much of the empirical research. In this paper we examine some of the principal factors that have impeded conceptual development, paying particular attention to the relationship between red tape and bureaucratic formalization. We argue that progress in red-tape research and knowledge requires attention to several issues, including the measurement of red tape, origins and sources of red tape, and the need to consider red tape from the perspective of multiple stakeholders.

AB - Advancements in our knowledge of red tape have been handicapped by a serious neglect in the development of red tape as an organizational concept. Progress has also been hindered by the rather haphazard application of this concept in much of the empirical research. In this paper we examine some of the principal factors that have impeded conceptual development, paying particular attention to the relationship between red tape and bureaucratic formalization. We argue that progress in red-tape research and knowledge requires attention to several issues, including the measurement of red tape, origins and sources of red tape, and the need to consider red tape from the perspective of multiple stakeholders.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84992882820&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84992882820&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/027507409602600101

DO - 10.1177/027507409602600101

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 1

EP - 17

JO - American Review of Public Administration

JF - American Review of Public Administration

SN - 0275-0740

IS - 1

ER -