Bureaucratic leverage over policy choice: Explaining the dynamics of state-level reforms in telecommunications regulation

Junseok Kim, Brian Gerber

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

While state governments have enjoyed greater control over regulating local telephone service providers since 1984, movement toward efficiency-based policy reform (e.g., adoption of competitive markets) has proceeded slowly. We investigate this pattern by addressing how the degree of policy discretion held by state public utility commissions (PUCs) affects reform of local telephone exchange regulation. Using precise measures of both PUC discretion and state policy changes over time, we find that states with "stronger" PUCs (more policymaking authority) are significantly more likely to move toward efficiency-based policy regimes and away from traditional rate-of-return regimes. Greater PUC discretion systematically related to state, adoption of efficiency-based reforms over time suggests that regulators are using updated information about policy impacts to inform their policymaking activities. Our findings contradict a common presumption that regulatory bureaucracies are simply motivated by a desire to increase their control over policymaking. Instead, state PUCs are a key source of telecommunications policy reform in the states.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)613-633
Number of pages21
JournalPolicy Studies Journal
Volume33
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

public utilities
telecommunication
regulation
reform
policy reform
reform policy
efficiency
telephone
information policy
bureaucracy
service provider
public utility
policy
regime
market

Keywords

  • Bureaucratic discretion
  • Deregulation
  • Political control of bureaucracy
  • Telecommunications policy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Public Administration

Cite this

Bureaucratic leverage over policy choice : Explaining the dynamics of state-level reforms in telecommunications regulation. / Kim, Junseok; Gerber, Brian.

In: Policy Studies Journal, Vol. 33, No. 4, 11.2005, p. 613-633.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{215f0e4509ba41c7afd1d9c718dcef8d,
title = "Bureaucratic leverage over policy choice: Explaining the dynamics of state-level reforms in telecommunications regulation",
abstract = "While state governments have enjoyed greater control over regulating local telephone service providers since 1984, movement toward efficiency-based policy reform (e.g., adoption of competitive markets) has proceeded slowly. We investigate this pattern by addressing how the degree of policy discretion held by state public utility commissions (PUCs) affects reform of local telephone exchange regulation. Using precise measures of both PUC discretion and state policy changes over time, we find that states with {"}stronger{"} PUCs (more policymaking authority) are significantly more likely to move toward efficiency-based policy regimes and away from traditional rate-of-return regimes. Greater PUC discretion systematically related to state, adoption of efficiency-based reforms over time suggests that regulators are using updated information about policy impacts to inform their policymaking activities. Our findings contradict a common presumption that regulatory bureaucracies are simply motivated by a desire to increase their control over policymaking. Instead, state PUCs are a key source of telecommunications policy reform in the states.",
keywords = "Bureaucratic discretion, Deregulation, Political control of bureaucracy, Telecommunications policy",
author = "Junseok Kim and Brian Gerber",
year = "2005",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1111/j.1541-0072.2005.00135.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "613--633",
journal = "Policy Studies Journal",
issn = "0190-292X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bureaucratic leverage over policy choice

T2 - Explaining the dynamics of state-level reforms in telecommunications regulation

AU - Kim, Junseok

AU - Gerber, Brian

PY - 2005/11

Y1 - 2005/11

N2 - While state governments have enjoyed greater control over regulating local telephone service providers since 1984, movement toward efficiency-based policy reform (e.g., adoption of competitive markets) has proceeded slowly. We investigate this pattern by addressing how the degree of policy discretion held by state public utility commissions (PUCs) affects reform of local telephone exchange regulation. Using precise measures of both PUC discretion and state policy changes over time, we find that states with "stronger" PUCs (more policymaking authority) are significantly more likely to move toward efficiency-based policy regimes and away from traditional rate-of-return regimes. Greater PUC discretion systematically related to state, adoption of efficiency-based reforms over time suggests that regulators are using updated information about policy impacts to inform their policymaking activities. Our findings contradict a common presumption that regulatory bureaucracies are simply motivated by a desire to increase their control over policymaking. Instead, state PUCs are a key source of telecommunications policy reform in the states.

AB - While state governments have enjoyed greater control over regulating local telephone service providers since 1984, movement toward efficiency-based policy reform (e.g., adoption of competitive markets) has proceeded slowly. We investigate this pattern by addressing how the degree of policy discretion held by state public utility commissions (PUCs) affects reform of local telephone exchange regulation. Using precise measures of both PUC discretion and state policy changes over time, we find that states with "stronger" PUCs (more policymaking authority) are significantly more likely to move toward efficiency-based policy regimes and away from traditional rate-of-return regimes. Greater PUC discretion systematically related to state, adoption of efficiency-based reforms over time suggests that regulators are using updated information about policy impacts to inform their policymaking activities. Our findings contradict a common presumption that regulatory bureaucracies are simply motivated by a desire to increase their control over policymaking. Instead, state PUCs are a key source of telecommunications policy reform in the states.

KW - Bureaucratic discretion

KW - Deregulation

KW - Political control of bureaucracy

KW - Telecommunications policy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=28244439252&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=28244439252&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2005.00135.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2005.00135.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:28244439252

VL - 33

SP - 613

EP - 633

JO - Policy Studies Journal

JF - Policy Studies Journal

SN - 0190-292X

IS - 4

ER -