Bureaucracy and public employee behavior

A case of local government

Mary Feeney, Leisha DeHart-Davis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Government reinvention advocates assert that less bureaucratic work environments will spark higher creativity, more risk taking, and greater productivity in public employees. Although government reinvention remains a topic of interest to scholars and practitioners alike, these particular arguments lack empirical support. In response, this article tests the relationship between different forms of bureaucratic control (formalization, red tape, and centralization) and reported employee perceptions and behavior in local governments. Analyzing mail survey data from a study of the employees of four cities in a Midwestern state, this article finds that employee responses to bureaucratic control are not as straightforward as reinventionists expect. Different types of bureaucratic control are related to distinct employee responses, and sometimes these responses are the very behaviors that reinventionists seek to trigger by reducing bureaucracy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)311-326
Number of pages16
JournalReview of Public Personnel Administration
Volume29
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

bureaucracy
employee
mail survey
formalization
centralization
work environment
creativity
productivity
Public employees
Employee behaviour
Bureaucracy
Local government
lack
Employees
Bureaucratic control
Government

Keywords

  • Bureaucratic control
  • Centralization
  • Formalization
  • Government reinvention
  • Red tape

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Administration
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Cite this

Bureaucracy and public employee behavior : A case of local government. / Feeney, Mary; DeHart-Davis, Leisha.

In: Review of Public Personnel Administration, Vol. 29, No. 4, 12.2009, p. 311-326.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{05d275fb57de4f279adef2a19e6c8325,
title = "Bureaucracy and public employee behavior: A case of local government",
abstract = "Government reinvention advocates assert that less bureaucratic work environments will spark higher creativity, more risk taking, and greater productivity in public employees. Although government reinvention remains a topic of interest to scholars and practitioners alike, these particular arguments lack empirical support. In response, this article tests the relationship between different forms of bureaucratic control (formalization, red tape, and centralization) and reported employee perceptions and behavior in local governments. Analyzing mail survey data from a study of the employees of four cities in a Midwestern state, this article finds that employee responses to bureaucratic control are not as straightforward as reinventionists expect. Different types of bureaucratic control are related to distinct employee responses, and sometimes these responses are the very behaviors that reinventionists seek to trigger by reducing bureaucracy.",
keywords = "Bureaucratic control, Centralization, Formalization, Government reinvention, Red tape",
author = "Mary Feeney and Leisha DeHart-Davis",
year = "2009",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1177/0734371X09333201",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "311--326",
journal = "Review of Public Personnel Administration",
issn = "0734-371X",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bureaucracy and public employee behavior

T2 - A case of local government

AU - Feeney, Mary

AU - DeHart-Davis, Leisha

PY - 2009/12

Y1 - 2009/12

N2 - Government reinvention advocates assert that less bureaucratic work environments will spark higher creativity, more risk taking, and greater productivity in public employees. Although government reinvention remains a topic of interest to scholars and practitioners alike, these particular arguments lack empirical support. In response, this article tests the relationship between different forms of bureaucratic control (formalization, red tape, and centralization) and reported employee perceptions and behavior in local governments. Analyzing mail survey data from a study of the employees of four cities in a Midwestern state, this article finds that employee responses to bureaucratic control are not as straightforward as reinventionists expect. Different types of bureaucratic control are related to distinct employee responses, and sometimes these responses are the very behaviors that reinventionists seek to trigger by reducing bureaucracy.

AB - Government reinvention advocates assert that less bureaucratic work environments will spark higher creativity, more risk taking, and greater productivity in public employees. Although government reinvention remains a topic of interest to scholars and practitioners alike, these particular arguments lack empirical support. In response, this article tests the relationship between different forms of bureaucratic control (formalization, red tape, and centralization) and reported employee perceptions and behavior in local governments. Analyzing mail survey data from a study of the employees of four cities in a Midwestern state, this article finds that employee responses to bureaucratic control are not as straightforward as reinventionists expect. Different types of bureaucratic control are related to distinct employee responses, and sometimes these responses are the very behaviors that reinventionists seek to trigger by reducing bureaucracy.

KW - Bureaucratic control

KW - Centralization

KW - Formalization

KW - Government reinvention

KW - Red tape

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70749115370&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70749115370&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0734371X09333201

DO - 10.1177/0734371X09333201

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 311

EP - 326

JO - Review of Public Personnel Administration

JF - Review of Public Personnel Administration

SN - 0734-371X

IS - 4

ER -