Built for speed, not for comfort. Darwinian theory and human culture.

P. J. Richerson, Robert Boyd

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Darwin believed that his theory of evolution would stand or fall on its ability to account for human behavior. No species could be an exception to his theory without imperiling the whole edifice. The ideas in the Descent of Man were widely discussed by his contemporaries although they were far from being the only evolutionary theories current in the late nineteenth century. Darwin's specific evolutionary ideas and those of his main followers had very little impact on the social sciences as they emerged as separate disciplines in the early Twentieth Century. Not until the late twentieth century were concerted, sophisticated efforts made to apply Darwinian theory to human behavior. Why such a long delay? We argue that Darwin's theory was rather modern in respects that conflicted with Victorian sensibilities and that he and his few close followers failed to influence any of the social sciences. The late Twentieth Century work takes up almost exactly where James Baldwin left off at the turn of the century.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)425-465
Number of pages41
JournalHistory and Philosophy of the Life Sciences
Volume23
Issue number3-4
StatePublished - 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Human Culture
Follower
Human Behavior
Social Sciences
James Baldwin
Evolutionary
Descent
Sensibility
Victorian Era
Evolutionary Theory
Darwin's Theory
Theory of Evolution

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • History
  • History and Philosophy of Science
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Built for speed, not for comfort. Darwinian theory and human culture. / Richerson, P. J.; Boyd, Robert.

In: History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, Vol. 23, No. 3-4, 2001, p. 425-465.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{fbd61563e1a5452daa3df995b5e4ed30,
title = "Built for speed, not for comfort. Darwinian theory and human culture.",
abstract = "Darwin believed that his theory of evolution would stand or fall on its ability to account for human behavior. No species could be an exception to his theory without imperiling the whole edifice. The ideas in the Descent of Man were widely discussed by his contemporaries although they were far from being the only evolutionary theories current in the late nineteenth century. Darwin's specific evolutionary ideas and those of his main followers had very little impact on the social sciences as they emerged as separate disciplines in the early Twentieth Century. Not until the late twentieth century were concerted, sophisticated efforts made to apply Darwinian theory to human behavior. Why such a long delay? We argue that Darwin's theory was rather modern in respects that conflicted with Victorian sensibilities and that he and his few close followers failed to influence any of the social sciences. The late Twentieth Century work takes up almost exactly where James Baldwin left off at the turn of the century.",
author = "Richerson, {P. J.} and Robert Boyd",
year = "2001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "425--465",
journal = "History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences",
issn = "0391-9714",
publisher = "Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn",
number = "3-4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Built for speed, not for comfort. Darwinian theory and human culture.

AU - Richerson, P. J.

AU - Boyd, Robert

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - Darwin believed that his theory of evolution would stand or fall on its ability to account for human behavior. No species could be an exception to his theory without imperiling the whole edifice. The ideas in the Descent of Man were widely discussed by his contemporaries although they were far from being the only evolutionary theories current in the late nineteenth century. Darwin's specific evolutionary ideas and those of his main followers had very little impact on the social sciences as they emerged as separate disciplines in the early Twentieth Century. Not until the late twentieth century were concerted, sophisticated efforts made to apply Darwinian theory to human behavior. Why such a long delay? We argue that Darwin's theory was rather modern in respects that conflicted with Victorian sensibilities and that he and his few close followers failed to influence any of the social sciences. The late Twentieth Century work takes up almost exactly where James Baldwin left off at the turn of the century.

AB - Darwin believed that his theory of evolution would stand or fall on its ability to account for human behavior. No species could be an exception to his theory without imperiling the whole edifice. The ideas in the Descent of Man were widely discussed by his contemporaries although they were far from being the only evolutionary theories current in the late nineteenth century. Darwin's specific evolutionary ideas and those of his main followers had very little impact on the social sciences as they emerged as separate disciplines in the early Twentieth Century. Not until the late twentieth century were concerted, sophisticated efforts made to apply Darwinian theory to human behavior. Why such a long delay? We argue that Darwin's theory was rather modern in respects that conflicted with Victorian sensibilities and that he and his few close followers failed to influence any of the social sciences. The late Twentieth Century work takes up almost exactly where James Baldwin left off at the turn of the century.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035554332&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035554332&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 12472064

AN - SCOPUS:0035554332

VL - 23

SP - 425

EP - 465

JO - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences

JF - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences

SN - 0391-9714

IS - 3-4

ER -