Budgeting audit time: Effects of audit step frame and verifiability

Eldar Maksymov, Mark W. Nelson, William R. Kinney

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Auditors must ensure that their audit plans budget sufficient time for key audit steps. Research has shown that insufficient audit time budgets can be detrimental to audit quality. We examine whether framing audit steps negatively (e.g., assess whether management’s assumptions are not appropriate) increases time budgets— particularly for steps in which the auditor perceives that performance quality is less verifiable, and thus most at risk of being performed with low quality. First, we report the results of analyses indicating that, in practice, audit steps are predominantly framed positively, potentially resulting in smaller time budgets. We then report the results of an experiment in which 50 experienced audit managers budget time for an audit program that tests a Level-3 fair-value estimate. Prior research and Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) inspections indicate that this is a challenging audit area, vulnerable to allegations of low audit quality. The results support our predictions and suggest that reframing audit steps negatively would increase audit time budgets—an audit quality indicator— particularly for less-verifiable steps.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)59-73
Number of pages15
JournalBehavioral Research in Accounting
Volume30
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2018

Fingerprint

Budgeting
Verifiability
Audit
Audit quality
Auditors
Oversight
Prediction
Experiment
Inspection
Fair value
Managers
Quality indicators

Keywords

  • Audit planning
  • Fair-value auditing
  • Frame of audit steps
  • Verifiability of audit steps

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Accounting
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Cite this

Budgeting audit time : Effects of audit step frame and verifiability. / Maksymov, Eldar; Nelson, Mark W.; Kinney, William R.

In: Behavioral Research in Accounting, Vol. 30, No. 1, 01.03.2018, p. 59-73.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Maksymov, Eldar ; Nelson, Mark W. ; Kinney, William R. / Budgeting audit time : Effects of audit step frame and verifiability. In: Behavioral Research in Accounting. 2018 ; Vol. 30, No. 1. pp. 59-73.
@article{1a6611463c154f26adc15338f90993f5,
title = "Budgeting audit time: Effects of audit step frame and verifiability",
abstract = "Auditors must ensure that their audit plans budget sufficient time for key audit steps. Research has shown that insufficient audit time budgets can be detrimental to audit quality. We examine whether framing audit steps negatively (e.g., assess whether management’s assumptions are not appropriate) increases time budgets— particularly for steps in which the auditor perceives that performance quality is less verifiable, and thus most at risk of being performed with low quality. First, we report the results of analyses indicating that, in practice, audit steps are predominantly framed positively, potentially resulting in smaller time budgets. We then report the results of an experiment in which 50 experienced audit managers budget time for an audit program that tests a Level-3 fair-value estimate. Prior research and Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) inspections indicate that this is a challenging audit area, vulnerable to allegations of low audit quality. The results support our predictions and suggest that reframing audit steps negatively would increase audit time budgets—an audit quality indicator— particularly for less-verifiable steps.",
keywords = "Audit planning, Fair-value auditing, Frame of audit steps, Verifiability of audit steps",
author = "Eldar Maksymov and Nelson, {Mark W.} and Kinney, {William R.}",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2308/bria-51923",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "59--73",
journal = "Behavioral Research in Accounting",
issn = "1050-4753",
publisher = "American Accounting Association",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Budgeting audit time

T2 - Effects of audit step frame and verifiability

AU - Maksymov, Eldar

AU - Nelson, Mark W.

AU - Kinney, William R.

PY - 2018/3/1

Y1 - 2018/3/1

N2 - Auditors must ensure that their audit plans budget sufficient time for key audit steps. Research has shown that insufficient audit time budgets can be detrimental to audit quality. We examine whether framing audit steps negatively (e.g., assess whether management’s assumptions are not appropriate) increases time budgets— particularly for steps in which the auditor perceives that performance quality is less verifiable, and thus most at risk of being performed with low quality. First, we report the results of analyses indicating that, in practice, audit steps are predominantly framed positively, potentially resulting in smaller time budgets. We then report the results of an experiment in which 50 experienced audit managers budget time for an audit program that tests a Level-3 fair-value estimate. Prior research and Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) inspections indicate that this is a challenging audit area, vulnerable to allegations of low audit quality. The results support our predictions and suggest that reframing audit steps negatively would increase audit time budgets—an audit quality indicator— particularly for less-verifiable steps.

AB - Auditors must ensure that their audit plans budget sufficient time for key audit steps. Research has shown that insufficient audit time budgets can be detrimental to audit quality. We examine whether framing audit steps negatively (e.g., assess whether management’s assumptions are not appropriate) increases time budgets— particularly for steps in which the auditor perceives that performance quality is less verifiable, and thus most at risk of being performed with low quality. First, we report the results of analyses indicating that, in practice, audit steps are predominantly framed positively, potentially resulting in smaller time budgets. We then report the results of an experiment in which 50 experienced audit managers budget time for an audit program that tests a Level-3 fair-value estimate. Prior research and Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) inspections indicate that this is a challenging audit area, vulnerable to allegations of low audit quality. The results support our predictions and suggest that reframing audit steps negatively would increase audit time budgets—an audit quality indicator— particularly for less-verifiable steps.

KW - Audit planning

KW - Fair-value auditing

KW - Frame of audit steps

KW - Verifiability of audit steps

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044273797&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85044273797&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2308/bria-51923

DO - 10.2308/bria-51923

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85044273797

VL - 30

SP - 59

EP - 73

JO - Behavioral Research in Accounting

JF - Behavioral Research in Accounting

SN - 1050-4753

IS - 1

ER -