Breaking the Double Impasse: Securing and Supporting Diverse Housing Tenures in the United States

Jake Wegmann, Alex Schafran, Deirdre Pfeiffer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

What might be described as a double impasse characterizes debate on U.S. housing tenure with advocates fighting for rental or ownership housing on one side and Third Way or mixed-tenure solutions on the other. Breaking this impasse requires disengaging from conceptions of an idealized form of tenure and instead advocating making virtually all tenures as secure and supported as possible, so that diverse households are able to live in homes that best fit their changing needs over their life cycles. This essay (a) presents data on the variety of tenures in the United States; (b) conveys a new two-dimensional map of tenure according to their degrees of control and potential for wealth-building; and (c) shows how U.S. institutions shape their risks and subsidies. Most U.S. tenures are at least somewhat risky, including those that receive the greatest federal subsidies. A new housing system is needed to secure and support as many tenures as possible.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-24
Number of pages24
JournalHousing Policy Debate
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jul 20 2016

Fingerprint

housing
subsidy
Third Way
fighting
life cycle
ownership
need
household

Keywords

  • homeownership
  • rental housing
  • Tenure
  • Third Way

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Development
  • Urban Studies
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

Breaking the Double Impasse : Securing and Supporting Diverse Housing Tenures in the United States. / Wegmann, Jake; Schafran, Alex; Pfeiffer, Deirdre.

In: Housing Policy Debate, 20.07.2016, p. 1-24.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{baa25c9cbb8f45fdabc64b43f7afa230,
title = "Breaking the Double Impasse: Securing and Supporting Diverse Housing Tenures in the United States",
abstract = "What might be described as a double impasse characterizes debate on U.S. housing tenure with advocates fighting for rental or ownership housing on one side and Third Way or mixed-tenure solutions on the other. Breaking this impasse requires disengaging from conceptions of an idealized form of tenure and instead advocating making virtually all tenures as secure and supported as possible, so that diverse households are able to live in homes that best fit their changing needs over their life cycles. This essay (a) presents data on the variety of tenures in the United States; (b) conveys a new two-dimensional map of tenure according to their degrees of control and potential for wealth-building; and (c) shows how U.S. institutions shape their risks and subsidies. Most U.S. tenures are at least somewhat risky, including those that receive the greatest federal subsidies. A new housing system is needed to secure and support as many tenures as possible.",
keywords = "homeownership, rental housing, Tenure, Third Way",
author = "Jake Wegmann and Alex Schafran and Deirdre Pfeiffer",
year = "2016",
month = "7",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1080/10511482.2016.1200109",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--24",
journal = "Housing Policy Debate",
issn = "1051-1482",
publisher = "Taylor Graham Publishing",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Breaking the Double Impasse

T2 - Securing and Supporting Diverse Housing Tenures in the United States

AU - Wegmann, Jake

AU - Schafran, Alex

AU - Pfeiffer, Deirdre

PY - 2016/7/20

Y1 - 2016/7/20

N2 - What might be described as a double impasse characterizes debate on U.S. housing tenure with advocates fighting for rental or ownership housing on one side and Third Way or mixed-tenure solutions on the other. Breaking this impasse requires disengaging from conceptions of an idealized form of tenure and instead advocating making virtually all tenures as secure and supported as possible, so that diverse households are able to live in homes that best fit their changing needs over their life cycles. This essay (a) presents data on the variety of tenures in the United States; (b) conveys a new two-dimensional map of tenure according to their degrees of control and potential for wealth-building; and (c) shows how U.S. institutions shape their risks and subsidies. Most U.S. tenures are at least somewhat risky, including those that receive the greatest federal subsidies. A new housing system is needed to secure and support as many tenures as possible.

AB - What might be described as a double impasse characterizes debate on U.S. housing tenure with advocates fighting for rental or ownership housing on one side and Third Way or mixed-tenure solutions on the other. Breaking this impasse requires disengaging from conceptions of an idealized form of tenure and instead advocating making virtually all tenures as secure and supported as possible, so that diverse households are able to live in homes that best fit their changing needs over their life cycles. This essay (a) presents data on the variety of tenures in the United States; (b) conveys a new two-dimensional map of tenure according to their degrees of control and potential for wealth-building; and (c) shows how U.S. institutions shape their risks and subsidies. Most U.S. tenures are at least somewhat risky, including those that receive the greatest federal subsidies. A new housing system is needed to secure and support as many tenures as possible.

KW - homeownership

KW - rental housing

KW - Tenure

KW - Third Way

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84978645675&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84978645675&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10511482.2016.1200109

DO - 10.1080/10511482.2016.1200109

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84978645675

SP - 1

EP - 24

JO - Housing Policy Debate

JF - Housing Policy Debate

SN - 1051-1482

ER -