BODY-WORN CAMERAS AS A POTENTIAL SOURCE OF DEPOLICING

TESTING FOR CAMERA-INDUCED PASSIVITY

Danielle Wallace, Michael White, Janne E. Gaub, Natalie Todak

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Contentious debate is currently taking place regarding the extent to which public scrutiny of the police post-Ferguson has led to depolicing or to a decrease in proactive police work. Advocates of the "Ferguson effect" claim the decline in proactive policing increased violent crime and assaults on the police. Although police body-worn cameras (BWCs) are touted as a police reform that can generate numerous benefits, they also represent a form of internal and public surveillance on the police. The surveillance aspect of BWCs suggests that BWCs may generate depolicing through camera-induced passivity. We test this question with data from a randomized controlled trial of BWCs in Spokane (WA) by assessing the impact of BWCs on four measures: officer-initiated calls, arrests, response time, and time on scene. We employ hierarchical linear and cross-classified models to test for between- and within-group differences in outcomes before and after the randomized BWC rollout. Our results demonstrate no evidence of statistically significant camera-induced passivity across any of the four outcomes. In fact, self-initiated calls increased for officers assigned to treatment during the RCT. We discuss the theoretical and policy implications of the findings for the ongoing dialogue in policing.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalCriminology
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Police
police
surveillance
violent crime
Crime
assault
Reaction Time
Randomized Controlled Trials
dialogue
reform
evidence
Group

Keywords

  • Body-worn cameras
  • Camera-induced passivity
  • Depolicing
  • Employee motivation
  • Ferguson effect

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Law

Cite this

BODY-WORN CAMERAS AS A POTENTIAL SOURCE OF DEPOLICING : TESTING FOR CAMERA-INDUCED PASSIVITY. / Wallace, Danielle; White, Michael; Gaub, Janne E.; Todak, Natalie.

In: Criminology, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{640f27f2dabe49a0a59a2e7b1c325cb8,
title = "BODY-WORN CAMERAS AS A POTENTIAL SOURCE OF DEPOLICING: TESTING FOR CAMERA-INDUCED PASSIVITY",
abstract = "Contentious debate is currently taking place regarding the extent to which public scrutiny of the police post-Ferguson has led to depolicing or to a decrease in proactive police work. Advocates of the {"}Ferguson effect{"} claim the decline in proactive policing increased violent crime and assaults on the police. Although police body-worn cameras (BWCs) are touted as a police reform that can generate numerous benefits, they also represent a form of internal and public surveillance on the police. The surveillance aspect of BWCs suggests that BWCs may generate depolicing through camera-induced passivity. We test this question with data from a randomized controlled trial of BWCs in Spokane (WA) by assessing the impact of BWCs on four measures: officer-initiated calls, arrests, response time, and time on scene. We employ hierarchical linear and cross-classified models to test for between- and within-group differences in outcomes before and after the randomized BWC rollout. Our results demonstrate no evidence of statistically significant camera-induced passivity across any of the four outcomes. In fact, self-initiated calls increased for officers assigned to treatment during the RCT. We discuss the theoretical and policy implications of the findings for the ongoing dialogue in policing.",
keywords = "Body-worn cameras, Camera-induced passivity, Depolicing, Employee motivation, Ferguson effect",
author = "Danielle Wallace and Michael White and Gaub, {Janne E.} and Natalie Todak",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/1745-9125.12179",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Criminology",
issn = "0011-1384",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - BODY-WORN CAMERAS AS A POTENTIAL SOURCE OF DEPOLICING

T2 - TESTING FOR CAMERA-INDUCED PASSIVITY

AU - Wallace, Danielle

AU - White, Michael

AU - Gaub, Janne E.

AU - Todak, Natalie

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Contentious debate is currently taking place regarding the extent to which public scrutiny of the police post-Ferguson has led to depolicing or to a decrease in proactive police work. Advocates of the "Ferguson effect" claim the decline in proactive policing increased violent crime and assaults on the police. Although police body-worn cameras (BWCs) are touted as a police reform that can generate numerous benefits, they also represent a form of internal and public surveillance on the police. The surveillance aspect of BWCs suggests that BWCs may generate depolicing through camera-induced passivity. We test this question with data from a randomized controlled trial of BWCs in Spokane (WA) by assessing the impact of BWCs on four measures: officer-initiated calls, arrests, response time, and time on scene. We employ hierarchical linear and cross-classified models to test for between- and within-group differences in outcomes before and after the randomized BWC rollout. Our results demonstrate no evidence of statistically significant camera-induced passivity across any of the four outcomes. In fact, self-initiated calls increased for officers assigned to treatment during the RCT. We discuss the theoretical and policy implications of the findings for the ongoing dialogue in policing.

AB - Contentious debate is currently taking place regarding the extent to which public scrutiny of the police post-Ferguson has led to depolicing or to a decrease in proactive police work. Advocates of the "Ferguson effect" claim the decline in proactive policing increased violent crime and assaults on the police. Although police body-worn cameras (BWCs) are touted as a police reform that can generate numerous benefits, they also represent a form of internal and public surveillance on the police. The surveillance aspect of BWCs suggests that BWCs may generate depolicing through camera-induced passivity. We test this question with data from a randomized controlled trial of BWCs in Spokane (WA) by assessing the impact of BWCs on four measures: officer-initiated calls, arrests, response time, and time on scene. We employ hierarchical linear and cross-classified models to test for between- and within-group differences in outcomes before and after the randomized BWC rollout. Our results demonstrate no evidence of statistically significant camera-induced passivity across any of the four outcomes. In fact, self-initiated calls increased for officers assigned to treatment during the RCT. We discuss the theoretical and policy implications of the findings for the ongoing dialogue in policing.

KW - Body-worn cameras

KW - Camera-induced passivity

KW - Depolicing

KW - Employee motivation

KW - Ferguson effect

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046335225&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85046335225&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1745-9125.12179

DO - 10.1111/1745-9125.12179

M3 - Article

JO - Criminology

JF - Criminology

SN - 0011-1384

ER -