Boas's changes in bodily form: The immigrant study, cranial plasticity, and Boas's physical anthropology

Clarence C. Gravlee, Harvey Bernard, William R. Leonard

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In two recent articles, we and another set of researchers independently reanalyzed data from Franz Boas's classic study of immigrants and their descendants. Whereas we confirm Boas's overarching conclusion regarding the plasticity of cranial form, Corey Sparks and Richard Jantz argue that Boas was incorrect. Here we attempt to reconcile these apparently incompatible conclusions. We first address methodological differences between our reanalyses and suggest that (1) Sparks and Jantz posed a different set of questions than we did, and (2) their results are largely consistent with our own. We then discuss our differing understandings of Boas's original argument and of the concept of cranial plasticity. In particular, we argue that Sparks and Jantz attribute to Boas a position he explicitly rejected. When we clarify Boas's position and place the immigrant study in historical context, Sparks and Jantz's renalysis supports our conclusion that, on the whole, Boas got it right.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)326-332
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Anthropologist
Volume105
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

anthropology
immigrant
Physical Anthropology
Plasticity
Boas
Immigrants

Keywords

  • Anthropometry
  • Franz Boas
  • Heritability
  • Immigrant study
  • Plasticity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anthropology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Boas's changes in bodily form : The immigrant study, cranial plasticity, and Boas's physical anthropology. / Gravlee, Clarence C.; Bernard, Harvey; Leonard, William R.

In: American Anthropologist, Vol. 105, No. 2, 01.01.2003, p. 326-332.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7b614a81463b4730b68c4470cc116091,
title = "Boas's changes in bodily form: The immigrant study, cranial plasticity, and Boas's physical anthropology",
abstract = "In two recent articles, we and another set of researchers independently reanalyzed data from Franz Boas's classic study of immigrants and their descendants. Whereas we confirm Boas's overarching conclusion regarding the plasticity of cranial form, Corey Sparks and Richard Jantz argue that Boas was incorrect. Here we attempt to reconcile these apparently incompatible conclusions. We first address methodological differences between our reanalyses and suggest that (1) Sparks and Jantz posed a different set of questions than we did, and (2) their results are largely consistent with our own. We then discuss our differing understandings of Boas's original argument and of the concept of cranial plasticity. In particular, we argue that Sparks and Jantz attribute to Boas a position he explicitly rejected. When we clarify Boas's position and place the immigrant study in historical context, Sparks and Jantz's renalysis supports our conclusion that, on the whole, Boas got it right.",
keywords = "Anthropometry, Franz Boas, Heritability, Immigrant study, Plasticity",
author = "Gravlee, {Clarence C.} and Harvey Bernard and Leonard, {William R.}",
year = "2003",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1525/aa.2003.105.2.326",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "105",
pages = "326--332",
journal = "American Anthropologist",
issn = "1548-1433",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Boas's changes in bodily form

T2 - The immigrant study, cranial plasticity, and Boas's physical anthropology

AU - Gravlee, Clarence C.

AU - Bernard, Harvey

AU - Leonard, William R.

PY - 2003/1/1

Y1 - 2003/1/1

N2 - In two recent articles, we and another set of researchers independently reanalyzed data from Franz Boas's classic study of immigrants and their descendants. Whereas we confirm Boas's overarching conclusion regarding the plasticity of cranial form, Corey Sparks and Richard Jantz argue that Boas was incorrect. Here we attempt to reconcile these apparently incompatible conclusions. We first address methodological differences between our reanalyses and suggest that (1) Sparks and Jantz posed a different set of questions than we did, and (2) their results are largely consistent with our own. We then discuss our differing understandings of Boas's original argument and of the concept of cranial plasticity. In particular, we argue that Sparks and Jantz attribute to Boas a position he explicitly rejected. When we clarify Boas's position and place the immigrant study in historical context, Sparks and Jantz's renalysis supports our conclusion that, on the whole, Boas got it right.

AB - In two recent articles, we and another set of researchers independently reanalyzed data from Franz Boas's classic study of immigrants and their descendants. Whereas we confirm Boas's overarching conclusion regarding the plasticity of cranial form, Corey Sparks and Richard Jantz argue that Boas was incorrect. Here we attempt to reconcile these apparently incompatible conclusions. We first address methodological differences between our reanalyses and suggest that (1) Sparks and Jantz posed a different set of questions than we did, and (2) their results are largely consistent with our own. We then discuss our differing understandings of Boas's original argument and of the concept of cranial plasticity. In particular, we argue that Sparks and Jantz attribute to Boas a position he explicitly rejected. When we clarify Boas's position and place the immigrant study in historical context, Sparks and Jantz's renalysis supports our conclusion that, on the whole, Boas got it right.

KW - Anthropometry

KW - Franz Boas

KW - Heritability

KW - Immigrant study

KW - Plasticity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037833407&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037833407&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1525/aa.2003.105.2.326

DO - 10.1525/aa.2003.105.2.326

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0037833407

VL - 105

SP - 326

EP - 332

JO - American Anthropologist

JF - American Anthropologist

SN - 1548-1433

IS - 2

ER -