Blinded by magic: Eye-movements reveal the misdirection of attention

Anthony S. Barnhart, Stephen Goldinger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recent studies (e.g., Kuhn and Tatler, 2005) have suggested that magic tricks can provide a powerful and compelling domain for the study of attention and perception. In particular, many stage illusions involve attentional misdirection, guiding the observer's gaze to a salient object or event, while another critical action, such as sleight of hand, is taking place. Even if the critical action takes place in full view, people typically fail to see it due to inattentional blindness (IB). In an eye-tracking experiment, participants watched videos of a new magic trick, wherein a coin placed beneath a napkin disappears, reappearing under a different napkin. Appropriately deployed attention would allow participants to detect the "secret" event that underlies the illusion (a moving coin), as it happens in full view and is visible for approximately 550 ms. Nevertheless, we observed high rates of IB. Unlike prior research, eye-movements during the critical event showed different patterns for participants, depending upon whether they saw the moving coin. The results also showed that when participants watched several "practice" videos without any moving coin, they became far more likely to detect the coin in the critical trial. Taken together, the findings are consistent with perceptual load theory (Lavie and Tsal, 1994).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number1461
JournalFrontiers in Psychology
Volume5
Issue numberDEC
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Numismatics
Magic
Eye Movements
Blindness
Research

Keywords

  • Attention
  • Covert attention
  • Eye-movements
  • Eye-tracking
  • Inattentional blindness
  • Magic
  • Perceptual load

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Blinded by magic : Eye-movements reveal the misdirection of attention. / Barnhart, Anthony S.; Goldinger, Stephen.

In: Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 5, No. DEC, 1461, 2014.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a9a5b7bdfbeb44b483c53ad2175122ad,
title = "Blinded by magic: Eye-movements reveal the misdirection of attention",
abstract = "Recent studies (e.g., Kuhn and Tatler, 2005) have suggested that magic tricks can provide a powerful and compelling domain for the study of attention and perception. In particular, many stage illusions involve attentional misdirection, guiding the observer's gaze to a salient object or event, while another critical action, such as sleight of hand, is taking place. Even if the critical action takes place in full view, people typically fail to see it due to inattentional blindness (IB). In an eye-tracking experiment, participants watched videos of a new magic trick, wherein a coin placed beneath a napkin disappears, reappearing under a different napkin. Appropriately deployed attention would allow participants to detect the {"}secret{"} event that underlies the illusion (a moving coin), as it happens in full view and is visible for approximately 550 ms. Nevertheless, we observed high rates of IB. Unlike prior research, eye-movements during the critical event showed different patterns for participants, depending upon whether they saw the moving coin. The results also showed that when participants watched several {"}practice{"} videos without any moving coin, they became far more likely to detect the coin in the critical trial. Taken together, the findings are consistent with perceptual load theory (Lavie and Tsal, 1994).",
keywords = "Attention, Covert attention, Eye-movements, Eye-tracking, Inattentional blindness, Magic, Perceptual load",
author = "Barnhart, {Anthony S.} and Stephen Goldinger",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01461",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
journal = "Frontiers in Psychology",
issn = "1664-1078",
publisher = "Frontiers Research Foundation",
number = "DEC",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Blinded by magic

T2 - Eye-movements reveal the misdirection of attention

AU - Barnhart, Anthony S.

AU - Goldinger, Stephen

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Recent studies (e.g., Kuhn and Tatler, 2005) have suggested that magic tricks can provide a powerful and compelling domain for the study of attention and perception. In particular, many stage illusions involve attentional misdirection, guiding the observer's gaze to a salient object or event, while another critical action, such as sleight of hand, is taking place. Even if the critical action takes place in full view, people typically fail to see it due to inattentional blindness (IB). In an eye-tracking experiment, participants watched videos of a new magic trick, wherein a coin placed beneath a napkin disappears, reappearing under a different napkin. Appropriately deployed attention would allow participants to detect the "secret" event that underlies the illusion (a moving coin), as it happens in full view and is visible for approximately 550 ms. Nevertheless, we observed high rates of IB. Unlike prior research, eye-movements during the critical event showed different patterns for participants, depending upon whether they saw the moving coin. The results also showed that when participants watched several "practice" videos without any moving coin, they became far more likely to detect the coin in the critical trial. Taken together, the findings are consistent with perceptual load theory (Lavie and Tsal, 1994).

AB - Recent studies (e.g., Kuhn and Tatler, 2005) have suggested that magic tricks can provide a powerful and compelling domain for the study of attention and perception. In particular, many stage illusions involve attentional misdirection, guiding the observer's gaze to a salient object or event, while another critical action, such as sleight of hand, is taking place. Even if the critical action takes place in full view, people typically fail to see it due to inattentional blindness (IB). In an eye-tracking experiment, participants watched videos of a new magic trick, wherein a coin placed beneath a napkin disappears, reappearing under a different napkin. Appropriately deployed attention would allow participants to detect the "secret" event that underlies the illusion (a moving coin), as it happens in full view and is visible for approximately 550 ms. Nevertheless, we observed high rates of IB. Unlike prior research, eye-movements during the critical event showed different patterns for participants, depending upon whether they saw the moving coin. The results also showed that when participants watched several "practice" videos without any moving coin, they became far more likely to detect the coin in the critical trial. Taken together, the findings are consistent with perceptual load theory (Lavie and Tsal, 1994).

KW - Attention

KW - Covert attention

KW - Eye-movements

KW - Eye-tracking

KW - Inattentional blindness

KW - Magic

KW - Perceptual load

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84923361001&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84923361001&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01461

DO - 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01461

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84923361001

VL - 5

JO - Frontiers in Psychology

JF - Frontiers in Psychology

SN - 1664-1078

IS - DEC

M1 - 1461

ER -