TY - JOUR
T1 - Blind tests of inter-analyst correspondence and accuracy in the identification of cut marks, percussion marks, and carnivore tooth marks on bone surfaces
AU - Blumenschine, Robert J.
AU - Marean, Curtis W.
AU - Capaldo, Salvatore D.
N1 - Funding Information:
RJB thanks all of the Rutgers students in his Spring, 1994 zooarchaeology class who participated in the blind test, particularly Greg Archetti, Rebecca Casapulla, Sean Daley, and Scott Rufolo. CWM thanks Laurence Frank, Stephen Glickman, and the staV at the Berkeley Spotted Hyaena Colony for their help. The captive colony is supported by the National Institute of Health grant No. 5R01 MH 399917 to Stephen Glickman. All of us appreciate the thoughtful comments of two anonymous reviewers.
PY - 1996/7
Y1 - 1996/7
N2 - We show through blind tests that marks inflicted on bone surfaces by carnivore teeth, hammerstone percussion, and metal knife cutting and scraping can be distinguished with near perfect reliability without scanning electron microscopy or consideration of only conspicuous marks. Using low-cost and high-volume hand lens and low-power light microscope techniques, we determined the presence or absence of conspicuous and inconspicuous marks with 97% three-way correspondence, and diagnosed marks of known origin to actor and effector with 99% accuracy. Novices with less than 3 h training on control collections correctly diagnosed 86% of classic but mainly inconspicuous marks. Novices spending several more hours studying control specimens elevated their diagnostic accuracy on morphologically representative marks to near-expert levels of 95%. Our results show that published cautions about mimicry among cut marks, percussion marks, and carnivore tooth marks are overstated. All types of marks examined can be identified reliably, regardless of conspicuousness. As such, fully standardized comparisons of mark frequencies can be drawn among assemblages, even those documented by different analysts. However, such robust interpretations can be attained only if analysts base diagnoses on (a) a firm familiarity with bones marked under strictly controlled conditions, (b) the systematic application of published morphological and contextual criteria, and (c) the use of prescribed low-power magnification techniques.
AB - We show through blind tests that marks inflicted on bone surfaces by carnivore teeth, hammerstone percussion, and metal knife cutting and scraping can be distinguished with near perfect reliability without scanning electron microscopy or consideration of only conspicuous marks. Using low-cost and high-volume hand lens and low-power light microscope techniques, we determined the presence or absence of conspicuous and inconspicuous marks with 97% three-way correspondence, and diagnosed marks of known origin to actor and effector with 99% accuracy. Novices with less than 3 h training on control collections correctly diagnosed 86% of classic but mainly inconspicuous marks. Novices spending several more hours studying control specimens elevated their diagnostic accuracy on morphologically representative marks to near-expert levels of 95%. Our results show that published cautions about mimicry among cut marks, percussion marks, and carnivore tooth marks are overstated. All types of marks examined can be identified reliably, regardless of conspicuousness. As such, fully standardized comparisons of mark frequencies can be drawn among assemblages, even those documented by different analysts. However, such robust interpretations can be attained only if analysts base diagnoses on (a) a firm familiarity with bones marked under strictly controlled conditions, (b) the systematic application of published morphological and contextual criteria, and (c) the use of prescribed low-power magnification techniques.
KW - Blind tests
KW - Bone modification
KW - Cut marks
KW - Percussion marks
KW - Taphonomy
KW - Tooth marks
KW - Zooarchaeology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0000445678&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0000445678&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1006/jasc.1996.0047
DO - 10.1006/jasc.1996.0047
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0000445678
SN - 0305-4403
VL - 23
SP - 493
EP - 507
JO - Journal of Archaeological Science
JF - Journal of Archaeological Science
IS - 4
ER -