Blind tests of inter-analyst correspondence and accuracy in the identification of cut marks, percussion marks, and carnivore tooth marks on bone surfaces

Robert J. Blumenschine, Curtis Marean, Salvatore D. Capaldo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

321 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We show through blind tests that marks inflicted on bone surfaces by carnivore teeth, hammerstone percussion, and metal knife cutting and scraping can be distinguished with near perfect reliability without scanning electron microscopy or consideration of only conspicuous marks. Using low-cost and high-volume hand lens and low-power light microscope techniques, we determined the presence or absence of conspicuous and inconspicuous marks with 97% three-way correspondence, and diagnosed marks of known origin to actor and effector with 99% accuracy. Novices with less than 3 h training on control collections correctly diagnosed 86% of classic but mainly inconspicuous marks. Novices spending several more hours studying control specimens elevated their diagnostic accuracy on morphologically representative marks to near-expert levels of 95%. Our results show that published cautions about mimicry among cut marks, percussion marks, and carnivore tooth marks are overstated. All types of marks examined can be identified reliably, regardless of conspicuousness. As such, fully standardized comparisons of mark frequencies can be drawn among assemblages, even those documented by different analysts. However, such robust interpretations can be attained only if analysts base diagnoses on (a) a firm familiarity with bones marked under strictly controlled conditions, (b) the systematic application of published morphological and contextual criteria, and (c) the use of prescribed low-power magnification techniques.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)493-507
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Archaeological Science
Volume23
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1996
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

diagnostic
expert
firm
interpretation
costs
Percussion Marks
Carnivore Tooth Marks
Novice
Cut Marks
Blind Test
Knife
Microscope
Controlled
Costs
Percussion
Familiarity
Contextual
Scanning Electron Microscopy
Mimicry
Assemblages

Keywords

  • Blind tests
  • Bone modification
  • Cut marks
  • Percussion marks
  • Taphonomy
  • Tooth marks
  • Zooarchaeology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • History
  • Archaeology

Cite this

Blind tests of inter-analyst correspondence and accuracy in the identification of cut marks, percussion marks, and carnivore tooth marks on bone surfaces. / Blumenschine, Robert J.; Marean, Curtis; Capaldo, Salvatore D.

In: Journal of Archaeological Science, Vol. 23, No. 4, 07.1996, p. 493-507.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d21b2a714d0a4064a2b482cb22628156,
title = "Blind tests of inter-analyst correspondence and accuracy in the identification of cut marks, percussion marks, and carnivore tooth marks on bone surfaces",
abstract = "We show through blind tests that marks inflicted on bone surfaces by carnivore teeth, hammerstone percussion, and metal knife cutting and scraping can be distinguished with near perfect reliability without scanning electron microscopy or consideration of only conspicuous marks. Using low-cost and high-volume hand lens and low-power light microscope techniques, we determined the presence or absence of conspicuous and inconspicuous marks with 97{\%} three-way correspondence, and diagnosed marks of known origin to actor and effector with 99{\%} accuracy. Novices with less than 3 h training on control collections correctly diagnosed 86{\%} of classic but mainly inconspicuous marks. Novices spending several more hours studying control specimens elevated their diagnostic accuracy on morphologically representative marks to near-expert levels of 95{\%}. Our results show that published cautions about mimicry among cut marks, percussion marks, and carnivore tooth marks are overstated. All types of marks examined can be identified reliably, regardless of conspicuousness. As such, fully standardized comparisons of mark frequencies can be drawn among assemblages, even those documented by different analysts. However, such robust interpretations can be attained only if analysts base diagnoses on (a) a firm familiarity with bones marked under strictly controlled conditions, (b) the systematic application of published morphological and contextual criteria, and (c) the use of prescribed low-power magnification techniques.",
keywords = "Blind tests, Bone modification, Cut marks, Percussion marks, Taphonomy, Tooth marks, Zooarchaeology",
author = "Blumenschine, {Robert J.} and Curtis Marean and Capaldo, {Salvatore D.}",
year = "1996",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1006/jasc.1996.0047",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "493--507",
journal = "Journal of Archaeological Science",
issn = "0305-4403",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Blind tests of inter-analyst correspondence and accuracy in the identification of cut marks, percussion marks, and carnivore tooth marks on bone surfaces

AU - Blumenschine, Robert J.

AU - Marean, Curtis

AU - Capaldo, Salvatore D.

PY - 1996/7

Y1 - 1996/7

N2 - We show through blind tests that marks inflicted on bone surfaces by carnivore teeth, hammerstone percussion, and metal knife cutting and scraping can be distinguished with near perfect reliability without scanning electron microscopy or consideration of only conspicuous marks. Using low-cost and high-volume hand lens and low-power light microscope techniques, we determined the presence or absence of conspicuous and inconspicuous marks with 97% three-way correspondence, and diagnosed marks of known origin to actor and effector with 99% accuracy. Novices with less than 3 h training on control collections correctly diagnosed 86% of classic but mainly inconspicuous marks. Novices spending several more hours studying control specimens elevated their diagnostic accuracy on morphologically representative marks to near-expert levels of 95%. Our results show that published cautions about mimicry among cut marks, percussion marks, and carnivore tooth marks are overstated. All types of marks examined can be identified reliably, regardless of conspicuousness. As such, fully standardized comparisons of mark frequencies can be drawn among assemblages, even those documented by different analysts. However, such robust interpretations can be attained only if analysts base diagnoses on (a) a firm familiarity with bones marked under strictly controlled conditions, (b) the systematic application of published morphological and contextual criteria, and (c) the use of prescribed low-power magnification techniques.

AB - We show through blind tests that marks inflicted on bone surfaces by carnivore teeth, hammerstone percussion, and metal knife cutting and scraping can be distinguished with near perfect reliability without scanning electron microscopy or consideration of only conspicuous marks. Using low-cost and high-volume hand lens and low-power light microscope techniques, we determined the presence or absence of conspicuous and inconspicuous marks with 97% three-way correspondence, and diagnosed marks of known origin to actor and effector with 99% accuracy. Novices with less than 3 h training on control collections correctly diagnosed 86% of classic but mainly inconspicuous marks. Novices spending several more hours studying control specimens elevated their diagnostic accuracy on morphologically representative marks to near-expert levels of 95%. Our results show that published cautions about mimicry among cut marks, percussion marks, and carnivore tooth marks are overstated. All types of marks examined can be identified reliably, regardless of conspicuousness. As such, fully standardized comparisons of mark frequencies can be drawn among assemblages, even those documented by different analysts. However, such robust interpretations can be attained only if analysts base diagnoses on (a) a firm familiarity with bones marked under strictly controlled conditions, (b) the systematic application of published morphological and contextual criteria, and (c) the use of prescribed low-power magnification techniques.

KW - Blind tests

KW - Bone modification

KW - Cut marks

KW - Percussion marks

KW - Taphonomy

KW - Tooth marks

KW - Zooarchaeology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0000445678&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0000445678&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1006/jasc.1996.0047

DO - 10.1006/jasc.1996.0047

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0000445678

VL - 23

SP - 493

EP - 507

JO - Journal of Archaeological Science

JF - Journal of Archaeological Science

SN - 0305-4403

IS - 4

ER -