Biomedical knowledge in explanations of clinical problems by medical students

Vimla Patel, G. J. GROEN, H. M. SCOTT

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

66 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Summary. This paper was motivated by a controversy concerning the role of basic sciences in medical education. A problem underlying this issue is that it is unknown how basic science is used in clinical reasoning. The experiment was designed to address this issue. Three texts were constructed dealing with basic science knowledge relevant to a clinical problem. Subjects were asked to read and recall the texts. Next, the subjects were required to read and recall the clinical text describing a patient problem. Finally, they were asked to provide a diagnosis and an explanation of the underlying pathophysiology. Subjects were first‐, second and fourth‐year medical students. Detailed analysis of subjects' protocols arc presented. In general, the results show that when basic science information is given before the clinical problem, the basic science knowledge is used either incorrectly or inconsistently in explaining the clinical problem by all subjects. The authors interpret these results to indicate that the basic sciences and the more practical clinical knowledge form two separate domains with their own individual structures and the clinical information cannot be embedded into the basic science knowledge structure. 1988 Blackwell Publishing

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)398-406
Number of pages9
JournalMedical Education
Volume22
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1988
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

medical student
science
information science
experiment
knowledge
education

Keywords

  • *clinical competence
  • *education, medical, undergraduate
  • biology/*educ
  • Quebec

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

Biomedical knowledge in explanations of clinical problems by medical students. / Patel, Vimla; GROEN, G. J.; SCOTT, H. M.

In: Medical Education, Vol. 22, No. 5, 01.01.1988, p. 398-406.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Patel, Vimla ; GROEN, G. J. ; SCOTT, H. M. / Biomedical knowledge in explanations of clinical problems by medical students. In: Medical Education. 1988 ; Vol. 22, No. 5. pp. 398-406.
@article{1a235ab0c7d84f94b82e9864c0aa84bd,
title = "Biomedical knowledge in explanations of clinical problems by medical students",
abstract = "Summary. This paper was motivated by a controversy concerning the role of basic sciences in medical education. A problem underlying this issue is that it is unknown how basic science is used in clinical reasoning. The experiment was designed to address this issue. Three texts were constructed dealing with basic science knowledge relevant to a clinical problem. Subjects were asked to read and recall the texts. Next, the subjects were required to read and recall the clinical text describing a patient problem. Finally, they were asked to provide a diagnosis and an explanation of the underlying pathophysiology. Subjects were first‐, second and fourth‐year medical students. Detailed analysis of subjects' protocols arc presented. In general, the results show that when basic science information is given before the clinical problem, the basic science knowledge is used either incorrectly or inconsistently in explaining the clinical problem by all subjects. The authors interpret these results to indicate that the basic sciences and the more practical clinical knowledge form two separate domains with their own individual structures and the clinical information cannot be embedded into the basic science knowledge structure. 1988 Blackwell Publishing",
keywords = "*clinical competence, *education, medical, undergraduate, biology/*educ, Quebec",
author = "Vimla Patel and GROEN, {G. J.} and SCOTT, {H. M.}",
year = "1988",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1365-2923.1988.tb00774.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "398--406",
journal = "Medical Education",
issn = "0308-0110",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Biomedical knowledge in explanations of clinical problems by medical students

AU - Patel, Vimla

AU - GROEN, G. J.

AU - SCOTT, H. M.

PY - 1988/1/1

Y1 - 1988/1/1

N2 - Summary. This paper was motivated by a controversy concerning the role of basic sciences in medical education. A problem underlying this issue is that it is unknown how basic science is used in clinical reasoning. The experiment was designed to address this issue. Three texts were constructed dealing with basic science knowledge relevant to a clinical problem. Subjects were asked to read and recall the texts. Next, the subjects were required to read and recall the clinical text describing a patient problem. Finally, they were asked to provide a diagnosis and an explanation of the underlying pathophysiology. Subjects were first‐, second and fourth‐year medical students. Detailed analysis of subjects' protocols arc presented. In general, the results show that when basic science information is given before the clinical problem, the basic science knowledge is used either incorrectly or inconsistently in explaining the clinical problem by all subjects. The authors interpret these results to indicate that the basic sciences and the more practical clinical knowledge form two separate domains with their own individual structures and the clinical information cannot be embedded into the basic science knowledge structure. 1988 Blackwell Publishing

AB - Summary. This paper was motivated by a controversy concerning the role of basic sciences in medical education. A problem underlying this issue is that it is unknown how basic science is used in clinical reasoning. The experiment was designed to address this issue. Three texts were constructed dealing with basic science knowledge relevant to a clinical problem. Subjects were asked to read and recall the texts. Next, the subjects were required to read and recall the clinical text describing a patient problem. Finally, they were asked to provide a diagnosis and an explanation of the underlying pathophysiology. Subjects were first‐, second and fourth‐year medical students. Detailed analysis of subjects' protocols arc presented. In general, the results show that when basic science information is given before the clinical problem, the basic science knowledge is used either incorrectly or inconsistently in explaining the clinical problem by all subjects. The authors interpret these results to indicate that the basic sciences and the more practical clinical knowledge form two separate domains with their own individual structures and the clinical information cannot be embedded into the basic science knowledge structure. 1988 Blackwell Publishing

KW - clinical competence

KW - education, medical, undergraduate

KW - biology/educ

KW - Quebec

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0023687248&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0023687248&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1988.tb00774.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1988.tb00774.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 3205191

AN - SCOPUS:0023687248

VL - 22

SP - 398

EP - 406

JO - Medical Education

JF - Medical Education

SN - 0308-0110

IS - 5

ER -