Biological invasion risks and the public good

An economic perspective

Charles Perrings, Mark Williamson, Edward B. Barbier, Doriana Delfino, Silvana Dalmazzone, Jason Shogren, Peter Simmons, Andrew Watkinson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

238 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We postulate that the causes of the problem of invasive alien species are primarily economic and, as such, require economic solutions. Invasive alien species are of increasing concern for four reasons. First, introductions are increasing sharply, while mechanisms for excluding or eradicating alien species have been either withdrawn or progressively weakened. Both trends are due to the liberalization of and increase in international travel and trade, an economic phenomenon. Second, the costs of invasions are rising rapidly due partly to increasing human population density, and partly to increasing intensity of production in genetically impoverished agricultural systems. Third, biological invasions are associated with a high degree of uncertainty both because they involve novel interactions, and because invasion risks are endogenous. Actual risks depend on how people react to the possibility of invasions. Fourth, the exclusion and control of invasive species is a "weakest-link" public good. This places the well-being of society in the hands of the least effective provider. We argue that an economic solution to the problem of invasive species has two components. One is to use incentives to change human behavior so as to enhance protection against the introduction, establishment, and spread of invasive behavior. The other is to develop institutions that support the weakest members of global society, converting a "weakest-link" to a "best-shot" public good.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalEcology and Society
Volume6
Issue number1
StatePublished - 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

biological invasion
introduced species
invasive species
economics
human behavior
liberalization
farming system
incentive
population density
cost
society

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology

Cite this

Perrings, C., Williamson, M., Barbier, E. B., Delfino, D., Dalmazzone, S., Shogren, J., ... Watkinson, A. (2002). Biological invasion risks and the public good: An economic perspective. Ecology and Society, 6(1).

Biological invasion risks and the public good : An economic perspective. / Perrings, Charles; Williamson, Mark; Barbier, Edward B.; Delfino, Doriana; Dalmazzone, Silvana; Shogren, Jason; Simmons, Peter; Watkinson, Andrew.

In: Ecology and Society, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2002.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Perrings, C, Williamson, M, Barbier, EB, Delfino, D, Dalmazzone, S, Shogren, J, Simmons, P & Watkinson, A 2002, 'Biological invasion risks and the public good: An economic perspective', Ecology and Society, vol. 6, no. 1.
Perrings C, Williamson M, Barbier EB, Delfino D, Dalmazzone S, Shogren J et al. Biological invasion risks and the public good: An economic perspective. Ecology and Society. 2002;6(1).
Perrings, Charles ; Williamson, Mark ; Barbier, Edward B. ; Delfino, Doriana ; Dalmazzone, Silvana ; Shogren, Jason ; Simmons, Peter ; Watkinson, Andrew. / Biological invasion risks and the public good : An economic perspective. In: Ecology and Society. 2002 ; Vol. 6, No. 1.
@article{ebb84fa37438437c8ed75c151640e4b1,
title = "Biological invasion risks and the public good: An economic perspective",
abstract = "We postulate that the causes of the problem of invasive alien species are primarily economic and, as such, require economic solutions. Invasive alien species are of increasing concern for four reasons. First, introductions are increasing sharply, while mechanisms for excluding or eradicating alien species have been either withdrawn or progressively weakened. Both trends are due to the liberalization of and increase in international travel and trade, an economic phenomenon. Second, the costs of invasions are rising rapidly due partly to increasing human population density, and partly to increasing intensity of production in genetically impoverished agricultural systems. Third, biological invasions are associated with a high degree of uncertainty both because they involve novel interactions, and because invasion risks are endogenous. Actual risks depend on how people react to the possibility of invasions. Fourth, the exclusion and control of invasive species is a {"}weakest-link{"} public good. This places the well-being of society in the hands of the least effective provider. We argue that an economic solution to the problem of invasive species has two components. One is to use incentives to change human behavior so as to enhance protection against the introduction, establishment, and spread of invasive behavior. The other is to develop institutions that support the weakest members of global society, converting a {"}weakest-link{"} to a {"}best-shot{"} public good.",
author = "Charles Perrings and Mark Williamson and Barbier, {Edward B.} and Doriana Delfino and Silvana Dalmazzone and Jason Shogren and Peter Simmons and Andrew Watkinson",
year = "2002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
journal = "Ecology and Society",
issn = "1708-3087",
publisher = "The Resilience Alliance",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Biological invasion risks and the public good

T2 - An economic perspective

AU - Perrings, Charles

AU - Williamson, Mark

AU - Barbier, Edward B.

AU - Delfino, Doriana

AU - Dalmazzone, Silvana

AU - Shogren, Jason

AU - Simmons, Peter

AU - Watkinson, Andrew

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - We postulate that the causes of the problem of invasive alien species are primarily economic and, as such, require economic solutions. Invasive alien species are of increasing concern for four reasons. First, introductions are increasing sharply, while mechanisms for excluding or eradicating alien species have been either withdrawn or progressively weakened. Both trends are due to the liberalization of and increase in international travel and trade, an economic phenomenon. Second, the costs of invasions are rising rapidly due partly to increasing human population density, and partly to increasing intensity of production in genetically impoverished agricultural systems. Third, biological invasions are associated with a high degree of uncertainty both because they involve novel interactions, and because invasion risks are endogenous. Actual risks depend on how people react to the possibility of invasions. Fourth, the exclusion and control of invasive species is a "weakest-link" public good. This places the well-being of society in the hands of the least effective provider. We argue that an economic solution to the problem of invasive species has two components. One is to use incentives to change human behavior so as to enhance protection against the introduction, establishment, and spread of invasive behavior. The other is to develop institutions that support the weakest members of global society, converting a "weakest-link" to a "best-shot" public good.

AB - We postulate that the causes of the problem of invasive alien species are primarily economic and, as such, require economic solutions. Invasive alien species are of increasing concern for four reasons. First, introductions are increasing sharply, while mechanisms for excluding or eradicating alien species have been either withdrawn or progressively weakened. Both trends are due to the liberalization of and increase in international travel and trade, an economic phenomenon. Second, the costs of invasions are rising rapidly due partly to increasing human population density, and partly to increasing intensity of production in genetically impoverished agricultural systems. Third, biological invasions are associated with a high degree of uncertainty both because they involve novel interactions, and because invasion risks are endogenous. Actual risks depend on how people react to the possibility of invasions. Fourth, the exclusion and control of invasive species is a "weakest-link" public good. This places the well-being of society in the hands of the least effective provider. We argue that an economic solution to the problem of invasive species has two components. One is to use incentives to change human behavior so as to enhance protection against the introduction, establishment, and spread of invasive behavior. The other is to develop institutions that support the weakest members of global society, converting a "weakest-link" to a "best-shot" public good.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=54249106929&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=54249106929&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 6

JO - Ecology and Society

JF - Ecology and Society

SN - 1708-3087

IS - 1

ER -