TY - JOUR
T1 - Biocementation of soils of different surface chemistries via enzyme induced carbonate precipitation (EICP)
T2 - An integrated laboratory and molecular dynamics study
AU - Ghasemi, Hamid
AU - Hatam-Lee, S. Milad
AU - Khodadadi Tirkolaei, Hamed
AU - Yazdani, Hessam
N1 - Funding Information:
This material is based upon work supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation under Grants CMMI 2046332 and EEC 1449501 . Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. Some of the computing for this project was performed at the OU Supercomputing Center for Education & Research (OSCER) at the University of Oklahoma (OU). The authors also acknowledge Research Computing at Arizona State University for providing HPC resources that have contributed to the research results reported within this paper.
Funding Information:
This material is based upon work supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation under Grants CMMI 2046332 and EEC 1449501. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. Some of the computing for this project was performed at the OU Supercomputing Center for Education & Research (OSCER) at the University of Oklahoma (OU). The authors also acknowledge Research Computing at Arizona State University for providing HPC resources that have contributed to the research results reported within this paper.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2022/5
Y1 - 2022/5
N2 - Biocementation is a ground improvement technique that involves precipitating a mineral (commonly calcium carbonate, CaCO3) in the soil pore space to bind soil particles, in turn increasing the strength and reducing the permeability of the soil. Ureolysis (i.e. hydrolysis of urea) is the most researched calcium carbonate precipitation mechanism, which can be induced through either a microbial (MICP) or enzymatic (EICP) process. While laboratory tests and field trials have provided strong evidence of the efficacy of biocementation in strengthening granular materials, the role of the precipitate–grain interface and the surface chemistry of soil grains in biocementation are largely unknown. This study aims to address this gap. To this end, two geotechnically similar sand samples differing considerably in the amount of iron oxide and iron sulfate on grain surface are biocemented via EICP and tested for unconfined compressive strength (UCS). The biocemented sample containing a high concentration of iron oxide and iron sulfate exhibits almost 50% lower UCS than the other sample. To investigate whether surface chemistry can explain this considerable difference, interactions of CaCO3 with quartz (SiO2), hematite (Fe2O3), and marcasite (FeS2) as polymorphs of silicon dioxide, iron oxide, and iron sulfide, respectively, are simulated using molecular dynamics. The influence of water content at the precipitate–grain interface is also considered. Simulation results indicate that in dry conditions, CaCO3 has almost two times stronger affinity for SiO2 than Fe2O3 and FeS2, suggesting that biocementation is most effective for clean sands. It is also shown that water reduces the precipitate–grain adhesion.
AB - Biocementation is a ground improvement technique that involves precipitating a mineral (commonly calcium carbonate, CaCO3) in the soil pore space to bind soil particles, in turn increasing the strength and reducing the permeability of the soil. Ureolysis (i.e. hydrolysis of urea) is the most researched calcium carbonate precipitation mechanism, which can be induced through either a microbial (MICP) or enzymatic (EICP) process. While laboratory tests and field trials have provided strong evidence of the efficacy of biocementation in strengthening granular materials, the role of the precipitate–grain interface and the surface chemistry of soil grains in biocementation are largely unknown. This study aims to address this gap. To this end, two geotechnically similar sand samples differing considerably in the amount of iron oxide and iron sulfate on grain surface are biocemented via EICP and tested for unconfined compressive strength (UCS). The biocemented sample containing a high concentration of iron oxide and iron sulfate exhibits almost 50% lower UCS than the other sample. To investigate whether surface chemistry can explain this considerable difference, interactions of CaCO3 with quartz (SiO2), hematite (Fe2O3), and marcasite (FeS2) as polymorphs of silicon dioxide, iron oxide, and iron sulfide, respectively, are simulated using molecular dynamics. The influence of water content at the precipitate–grain interface is also considered. Simulation results indicate that in dry conditions, CaCO3 has almost two times stronger affinity for SiO2 than Fe2O3 and FeS2, suggesting that biocementation is most effective for clean sands. It is also shown that water reduces the precipitate–grain adhesion.
KW - Atomistic simulation
KW - Biocementation
KW - EICP
KW - Ground improvement
KW - MICP
KW - Ottawa sand
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85125942964&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85125942964&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.bpc.2022.106793
DO - 10.1016/j.bpc.2022.106793
M3 - Article
C2 - 35278891
AN - SCOPUS:85125942964
SN - 0301-4622
VL - 284
JO - Biophysical Chemistry
JF - Biophysical Chemistry
M1 - 106793
ER -