Binocular processing of motion: Some unresolved questions

David Regan, Robert Gray

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The unresolved questions relating to binocular processing of motion include: Is the perceived speed of the motion in depth (MID) of an approaching object inversely proportional to the time to collision?; What visual information supports judgements of the direction of MID?; What is the relation between binocular and monocular processing in the perception of MID? We review whether the perception of stereomotion in depth of a monocularly visible object is caused entirely by a rate of change of disparity, and conclude that the difference between the horizontal velocities of the object's left and right retinal images makes at most only a small contribution to speed discrimination, but conclusions may be different for detection, perceived speed and directional discrimination. We review laboratory evidence on the relative importance of binocular and monocular information for interceptive action and collision avoidance and conclude that, in addition to the effect of considerable intersubject variability, the relative importance depends on the physical size of the approaching object, its distance and, if nonspherical, its direction of motion and whether it is rotating. We compare attempts to find whether the human visual system contains a mechanism specialized for the speed of cyclopean motion within a frontoparallel plane, and find the question ill-posed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-43
Number of pages43
JournalSpatial Vision
Volume22
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2009

Fingerprint

Binoculars
Processing
Motion Perception
Collision avoidance

Keywords

  • Binocular VISION
  • MOTION
  • STEREOMOTION
  • Stereopsis
  • VISUALLY-GUIDED ACTION

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Cite this

Binocular processing of motion : Some unresolved questions. / Regan, David; Gray, Robert.

In: Spatial Vision, Vol. 22, No. 1, 01.01.2009, p. 1-43.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{dff9b3538da44934858b249886a0b5b3,
title = "Binocular processing of motion: Some unresolved questions",
abstract = "The unresolved questions relating to binocular processing of motion include: Is the perceived speed of the motion in depth (MID) of an approaching object inversely proportional to the time to collision?; What visual information supports judgements of the direction of MID?; What is the relation between binocular and monocular processing in the perception of MID? We review whether the perception of stereomotion in depth of a monocularly visible object is caused entirely by a rate of change of disparity, and conclude that the difference between the horizontal velocities of the object's left and right retinal images makes at most only a small contribution to speed discrimination, but conclusions may be different for detection, perceived speed and directional discrimination. We review laboratory evidence on the relative importance of binocular and monocular information for interceptive action and collision avoidance and conclude that, in addition to the effect of considerable intersubject variability, the relative importance depends on the physical size of the approaching object, its distance and, if nonspherical, its direction of motion and whether it is rotating. We compare attempts to find whether the human visual system contains a mechanism specialized for the speed of cyclopean motion within a frontoparallel plane, and find the question ill-posed.",
keywords = "Binocular VISION, MOTION, STEREOMOTION, Stereopsis, VISUALLY-GUIDED ACTION",
author = "David Regan and Robert Gray",
year = "2009",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1163/156856809786618501",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "1--43",
journal = "Multisensory research",
issn = "2213-4794",
publisher = "Brill",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Binocular processing of motion

T2 - Some unresolved questions

AU - Regan, David

AU - Gray, Robert

PY - 2009/1/1

Y1 - 2009/1/1

N2 - The unresolved questions relating to binocular processing of motion include: Is the perceived speed of the motion in depth (MID) of an approaching object inversely proportional to the time to collision?; What visual information supports judgements of the direction of MID?; What is the relation between binocular and monocular processing in the perception of MID? We review whether the perception of stereomotion in depth of a monocularly visible object is caused entirely by a rate of change of disparity, and conclude that the difference between the horizontal velocities of the object's left and right retinal images makes at most only a small contribution to speed discrimination, but conclusions may be different for detection, perceived speed and directional discrimination. We review laboratory evidence on the relative importance of binocular and monocular information for interceptive action and collision avoidance and conclude that, in addition to the effect of considerable intersubject variability, the relative importance depends on the physical size of the approaching object, its distance and, if nonspherical, its direction of motion and whether it is rotating. We compare attempts to find whether the human visual system contains a mechanism specialized for the speed of cyclopean motion within a frontoparallel plane, and find the question ill-posed.

AB - The unresolved questions relating to binocular processing of motion include: Is the perceived speed of the motion in depth (MID) of an approaching object inversely proportional to the time to collision?; What visual information supports judgements of the direction of MID?; What is the relation between binocular and monocular processing in the perception of MID? We review whether the perception of stereomotion in depth of a monocularly visible object is caused entirely by a rate of change of disparity, and conclude that the difference between the horizontal velocities of the object's left and right retinal images makes at most only a small contribution to speed discrimination, but conclusions may be different for detection, perceived speed and directional discrimination. We review laboratory evidence on the relative importance of binocular and monocular information for interceptive action and collision avoidance and conclude that, in addition to the effect of considerable intersubject variability, the relative importance depends on the physical size of the approaching object, its distance and, if nonspherical, its direction of motion and whether it is rotating. We compare attempts to find whether the human visual system contains a mechanism specialized for the speed of cyclopean motion within a frontoparallel plane, and find the question ill-posed.

KW - Binocular VISION

KW - MOTION

KW - STEREOMOTION

KW - Stereopsis

KW - VISUALLY-GUIDED ACTION

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=65849243509&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=65849243509&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1163/156856809786618501

DO - 10.1163/156856809786618501

M3 - Article

C2 - 19055886

AN - SCOPUS:65849243509

VL - 22

SP - 1

EP - 43

JO - Multisensory research

JF - Multisensory research

SN - 2213-4794

IS - 1

ER -