TY - JOUR
T1 - Bicyclist Crash Types on National, State, and Local Levels
T2 - A New Look
AU - Thomas, Libby
AU - Nordback, Krista
AU - Sanders, Rebecca
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was funded by NCHRP 15-60 and 15-63, and FHWA’s Pedestrian and Bicycle Information Center. PBCAT-coded crash databases were provided by NHTSA, HSRC from projects supported by NCDOT, and the City of Boulder (Michael Gardner-Sweeney, Marni Ratzel, Chris Hagelin, Shannon Young, and Bill Cowern). Daniel Levitt of HSRC, compiled the FARS and NC databases.
PY - 2019/6/1
Y1 - 2019/6/1
N2 - This paper presents an overview of prevalent bicyclist crash types in the United States, providing insights for practitioners that may be useful in planning safer networks and taking other proactive and risk-based approaches to treatment. The study compares fatal bicyclist crash types from national data with serious injury and all-severity bicyclist collisions from the state of North Carolina (NC) and the city of Boulder, Colorado. Overall, bicyclist fatalities in the United States are more prevalent in urban areas (69%) than rural areas (29%). Though the majority of all-severity crashes are at intersections, most fatal and disabling injury bicyclist crashes occur at non-intersection locations, including nearly one-third of bicyclists who die from collisions involving overtaking motorists. Top intersection crash types across national fatal and all-severity crashes in NC and Boulder include bicyclists failing to yield and motorists turning across a bicyclist’s path. However, many of the top all-severity types in the two jurisdictions differ from the top fatal crash types nationwide. These comparisons provide a fresh look at bicyclist crash type trends and have potential importance with respect to planning safer networks for Vision Zero communities, since a key finding is that locations and crash types most prevalent among fatal and serious injuries may differ from the most prevalent types for all-severity crashes. The findings could be useful to agencies lacking their own resources for risk-based assessment, but also suggest it is important to analyze higher severity crash types and jurisdiction-specific data when possible.
AB - This paper presents an overview of prevalent bicyclist crash types in the United States, providing insights for practitioners that may be useful in planning safer networks and taking other proactive and risk-based approaches to treatment. The study compares fatal bicyclist crash types from national data with serious injury and all-severity bicyclist collisions from the state of North Carolina (NC) and the city of Boulder, Colorado. Overall, bicyclist fatalities in the United States are more prevalent in urban areas (69%) than rural areas (29%). Though the majority of all-severity crashes are at intersections, most fatal and disabling injury bicyclist crashes occur at non-intersection locations, including nearly one-third of bicyclists who die from collisions involving overtaking motorists. Top intersection crash types across national fatal and all-severity crashes in NC and Boulder include bicyclists failing to yield and motorists turning across a bicyclist’s path. However, many of the top all-severity types in the two jurisdictions differ from the top fatal crash types nationwide. These comparisons provide a fresh look at bicyclist crash type trends and have potential importance with respect to planning safer networks for Vision Zero communities, since a key finding is that locations and crash types most prevalent among fatal and serious injuries may differ from the most prevalent types for all-severity crashes. The findings could be useful to agencies lacking their own resources for risk-based assessment, but also suggest it is important to analyze higher severity crash types and jurisdiction-specific data when possible.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067828215&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85067828215&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/0361198119849056
DO - 10.1177/0361198119849056
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85067828215
SN - 0361-1981
VL - 2673
SP - 664
EP - 676
JO - Transportation Research Record
JF - Transportation Research Record
IS - 6
ER -