Bias present in US federal agency power plant CO2 emissions data and implications for the US clean power plan

Kevin Gurney, J. Huang, K. Coltin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Power plants constitute roughly 40% of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in the United States. Climate change science, air pollution regulation, and potential carbon trading policies rely on accurate, unbiased quantification of these large point sources. Two US federal agencies - the Department of Energy and the Environmental Protection Agency - tabulate the emissions from US power plants using two different methodological approaches. We have analyzed those two data sets and have found that when averaged over all US facilities, the median percentage difference is less than 3%. However, this small difference masks large, non-Gaussian, positive and negative differences at individual facilities. For example, over the 2001-2009 time period, nearly one-half of the facilities have monthly emission differences that exceed roughly ±6% and one-fifth exceed roughly ±13%. It is currently not possible to assess whether one, or both, of the datasets examined here are responsible for the emissions difference. Differences this large at the individual facility level raise concerns regarding the operationalization of policy within the United States such as the recently announced Clean Power Plan. This policy relies on the achievement of state-level CO2 emission rate targets. When examined at the state-level we find that one-third of the states have differences that exceed 10% of their assigned reduction amount. Such levels of uncertainty raise concerns about the ability of individual states to accurately quantify emission rates in order to meet the regulatory targets.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number064005
JournalEnvironmental Research Letters
Volume11
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2016

Fingerprint

Power Plants
power plant
Power plants
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Aptitude
Climate Change
Air Pollution
Masks
Individuality
Carbon Dioxide
Uncertainty
Environmental Protection Agency
Carbon
Air pollution
Climate change
Carbon dioxide
emissions trading
point source
Power (Psychology)
emission data

Keywords

  • carbon dioxide
  • climate change
  • climate policy
  • power plants

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Bias present in US federal agency power plant CO2 emissions data and implications for the US clean power plan. / Gurney, Kevin; Huang, J.; Coltin, K.

In: Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 11, No. 6, 064005, 01.06.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6e7c579b1dc04a9281bfa65926713289,
title = "Bias present in US federal agency power plant CO2 emissions data and implications for the US clean power plan",
abstract = "Power plants constitute roughly 40{\%} of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in the United States. Climate change science, air pollution regulation, and potential carbon trading policies rely on accurate, unbiased quantification of these large point sources. Two US federal agencies - the Department of Energy and the Environmental Protection Agency - tabulate the emissions from US power plants using two different methodological approaches. We have analyzed those two data sets and have found that when averaged over all US facilities, the median percentage difference is less than 3{\%}. However, this small difference masks large, non-Gaussian, positive and negative differences at individual facilities. For example, over the 2001-2009 time period, nearly one-half of the facilities have monthly emission differences that exceed roughly ±6{\%} and one-fifth exceed roughly ±13{\%}. It is currently not possible to assess whether one, or both, of the datasets examined here are responsible for the emissions difference. Differences this large at the individual facility level raise concerns regarding the operationalization of policy within the United States such as the recently announced Clean Power Plan. This policy relies on the achievement of state-level CO2 emission rate targets. When examined at the state-level we find that one-third of the states have differences that exceed 10{\%} of their assigned reduction amount. Such levels of uncertainty raise concerns about the ability of individual states to accurately quantify emission rates in order to meet the regulatory targets.",
keywords = "carbon dioxide, climate change, climate policy, power plants",
author = "Kevin Gurney and J. Huang and K. Coltin",
year = "2016",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1088/1748-9326/11/6/064005",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
journal = "Environmental Research Letters",
issn = "1748-9326",
publisher = "IOP Publishing Ltd.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bias present in US federal agency power plant CO2 emissions data and implications for the US clean power plan

AU - Gurney, Kevin

AU - Huang, J.

AU - Coltin, K.

PY - 2016/6/1

Y1 - 2016/6/1

N2 - Power plants constitute roughly 40% of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in the United States. Climate change science, air pollution regulation, and potential carbon trading policies rely on accurate, unbiased quantification of these large point sources. Two US federal agencies - the Department of Energy and the Environmental Protection Agency - tabulate the emissions from US power plants using two different methodological approaches. We have analyzed those two data sets and have found that when averaged over all US facilities, the median percentage difference is less than 3%. However, this small difference masks large, non-Gaussian, positive and negative differences at individual facilities. For example, over the 2001-2009 time period, nearly one-half of the facilities have monthly emission differences that exceed roughly ±6% and one-fifth exceed roughly ±13%. It is currently not possible to assess whether one, or both, of the datasets examined here are responsible for the emissions difference. Differences this large at the individual facility level raise concerns regarding the operationalization of policy within the United States such as the recently announced Clean Power Plan. This policy relies on the achievement of state-level CO2 emission rate targets. When examined at the state-level we find that one-third of the states have differences that exceed 10% of their assigned reduction amount. Such levels of uncertainty raise concerns about the ability of individual states to accurately quantify emission rates in order to meet the regulatory targets.

AB - Power plants constitute roughly 40% of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in the United States. Climate change science, air pollution regulation, and potential carbon trading policies rely on accurate, unbiased quantification of these large point sources. Two US federal agencies - the Department of Energy and the Environmental Protection Agency - tabulate the emissions from US power plants using two different methodological approaches. We have analyzed those two data sets and have found that when averaged over all US facilities, the median percentage difference is less than 3%. However, this small difference masks large, non-Gaussian, positive and negative differences at individual facilities. For example, over the 2001-2009 time period, nearly one-half of the facilities have monthly emission differences that exceed roughly ±6% and one-fifth exceed roughly ±13%. It is currently not possible to assess whether one, or both, of the datasets examined here are responsible for the emissions difference. Differences this large at the individual facility level raise concerns regarding the operationalization of policy within the United States such as the recently announced Clean Power Plan. This policy relies on the achievement of state-level CO2 emission rate targets. When examined at the state-level we find that one-third of the states have differences that exceed 10% of their assigned reduction amount. Such levels of uncertainty raise concerns about the ability of individual states to accurately quantify emission rates in order to meet the regulatory targets.

KW - carbon dioxide

KW - climate change

KW - climate policy

KW - power plants

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84977585441&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84977585441&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1088/1748-9326/11/6/064005

DO - 10.1088/1748-9326/11/6/064005

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84977585441

VL - 11

JO - Environmental Research Letters

JF - Environmental Research Letters

SN - 1748-9326

IS - 6

M1 - 064005

ER -