Bias correction of climate model outputs influences watershed model nutrient load predictions

Lorrayne Miralha, Rebecca L. Muenich, Donald Scavia, Karlie Wells, Allison L. Steiner, Margaret Kalcic, Anna Apostel, Samantha Basile, Christine J. Kirchhoff

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Waterbodies around the world experience problems associated with elevated phosphorus (P) and nitrogen (N) loads. While vital for ecosystem functioning, when present in excess amounts these nutrients can impair water quality and create symptoms of eutrophication, including harmful algal blooms. Under a changing climate, nutrient loads are likely to change. While climate models can serve as inputs to watershed models, the climate models often do not adequately represent the distribution of observed data, generating uncertainties that can be addressed to some degree with bias correction. However, the impacts of bias correction on nutrient models are not well understood. This study compares 4 univariate and 3 multivariate bias correction methods, which correct precipitation and temperature variables from 4 climate models in the historical (1980–1999) and mid-century future (2046–2065) time periods. These variables served as inputs to a calibrated Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model of Lake Erie's Maumee River watershed. We compared the performance of SWAT outputs driven with climate model outputs that were bias-corrected (BC) and not bias-corrected (no-BC) for dissolved reactive P, total P, and total N. Results based on graphical comparisons and goodness of fit metrics showed that the choice of BC method impacts both the direction of change and magnitude of nutrient loads and hydrological processes. While the Delta method performed best, it should be used with caution since it considers historical variable relationships as the basis for predictions, which may not hold true under future climate. Quantile Delta Mapping (QDM) and Multivariate Bias Correction N-dimensional probability density function transform (MBCn) BC methods also performed well and work well for non-stationary climate scenarios. Furthermore, results suggest that February–July cumulative load in the Maumee basin is likely to decrease in the mid-century as runoff and snowfall decrease, and evapotranspiration increases with warming temperatures.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number143039
JournalScience of the Total Environment
Volume759
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 10 2021

Keywords

  • Climate change
  • Climate model
  • Delta
  • MBC
  • Nitrogen
  • Phosphorus
  • QDM
  • SWAT
  • Univariate and multivariate bias correction
  • Watershed model

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Engineering
  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Waste Management and Disposal
  • Pollution

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Bias correction of climate model outputs influences watershed model nutrient load predictions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this