Beyond Construction: Five arguments for the role and value of critique in learning science

Joseph Henderson, Anna MacPherson, Jonathan Osborne, Andrew Wild

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper argues that science education has overemphasized the importance of construction at the expense of critique. In doing so, it draws on two key premises—Ford's argument that the construction of knowledge requires a dialectic between construction and critique and Mercier and Sperber's theory of argumentative reasoning that critique is essential for epistemic vigilance. Five separate cases are presented which argue that the absence of critique within school science limits the opportunities for students to engage in scientific reasoning making the learning of science less effective. These five arguments incorporate research literature surrounding the nature of science, epistemology, literacy, pedagogy, and motivation. Furthermore, we draw on data collected from cognitive think-aloud interviews to show that students can, with the appropriate prompts, engage in the important epistemic activity of critique. We conclude by examining the implications for the teaching and learning of science. In essence, we argue that the undervaluing of critique within the curriculum and pedagogy of school science results in a failure to develop the analytical faculties which are the valued hall mark of the practicing scientist; a misrepresentation of the nature of science; and, more importantly, a less effective learning experience. Critique, therefore, needs to play a central role in the teaching and learning of science.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1668-1697
Number of pages30
JournalInternational Journal of Science Education
Volume37
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 3 2015

Fingerprint

science
learning
Values
Teaching
dialectics
epistemology
school
student
literacy
curriculum
interview
education
experience

Keywords

  • Argumentation
  • Questioning
  • Reasoning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

Beyond Construction : Five arguments for the role and value of critique in learning science. / Henderson, Joseph; MacPherson, Anna; Osborne, Jonathan; Wild, Andrew.

In: International Journal of Science Education, Vol. 37, No. 10, 03.07.2015, p. 1668-1697.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Henderson, Joseph ; MacPherson, Anna ; Osborne, Jonathan ; Wild, Andrew. / Beyond Construction : Five arguments for the role and value of critique in learning science. In: International Journal of Science Education. 2015 ; Vol. 37, No. 10. pp. 1668-1697.
@article{3f4a345ef8f545239df7b83e8c7a2553,
title = "Beyond Construction: Five arguments for the role and value of critique in learning science",
abstract = "This paper argues that science education has overemphasized the importance of construction at the expense of critique. In doing so, it draws on two key premises—Ford's argument that the construction of knowledge requires a dialectic between construction and critique and Mercier and Sperber's theory of argumentative reasoning that critique is essential for epistemic vigilance. Five separate cases are presented which argue that the absence of critique within school science limits the opportunities for students to engage in scientific reasoning making the learning of science less effective. These five arguments incorporate research literature surrounding the nature of science, epistemology, literacy, pedagogy, and motivation. Furthermore, we draw on data collected from cognitive think-aloud interviews to show that students can, with the appropriate prompts, engage in the important epistemic activity of critique. We conclude by examining the implications for the teaching and learning of science. In essence, we argue that the undervaluing of critique within the curriculum and pedagogy of school science results in a failure to develop the analytical faculties which are the valued hall mark of the practicing scientist; a misrepresentation of the nature of science; and, more importantly, a less effective learning experience. Critique, therefore, needs to play a central role in the teaching and learning of science.",
keywords = "Argumentation, Questioning, Reasoning",
author = "Joseph Henderson and Anna MacPherson and Jonathan Osborne and Andrew Wild",
year = "2015",
month = "7",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1080/09500693.2015.1043598",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "1668--1697",
journal = "International Journal of Science Education",
issn = "0950-0693",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Beyond Construction

T2 - Five arguments for the role and value of critique in learning science

AU - Henderson, Joseph

AU - MacPherson, Anna

AU - Osborne, Jonathan

AU - Wild, Andrew

PY - 2015/7/3

Y1 - 2015/7/3

N2 - This paper argues that science education has overemphasized the importance of construction at the expense of critique. In doing so, it draws on two key premises—Ford's argument that the construction of knowledge requires a dialectic between construction and critique and Mercier and Sperber's theory of argumentative reasoning that critique is essential for epistemic vigilance. Five separate cases are presented which argue that the absence of critique within school science limits the opportunities for students to engage in scientific reasoning making the learning of science less effective. These five arguments incorporate research literature surrounding the nature of science, epistemology, literacy, pedagogy, and motivation. Furthermore, we draw on data collected from cognitive think-aloud interviews to show that students can, with the appropriate prompts, engage in the important epistemic activity of critique. We conclude by examining the implications for the teaching and learning of science. In essence, we argue that the undervaluing of critique within the curriculum and pedagogy of school science results in a failure to develop the analytical faculties which are the valued hall mark of the practicing scientist; a misrepresentation of the nature of science; and, more importantly, a less effective learning experience. Critique, therefore, needs to play a central role in the teaching and learning of science.

AB - This paper argues that science education has overemphasized the importance of construction at the expense of critique. In doing so, it draws on two key premises—Ford's argument that the construction of knowledge requires a dialectic between construction and critique and Mercier and Sperber's theory of argumentative reasoning that critique is essential for epistemic vigilance. Five separate cases are presented which argue that the absence of critique within school science limits the opportunities for students to engage in scientific reasoning making the learning of science less effective. These five arguments incorporate research literature surrounding the nature of science, epistemology, literacy, pedagogy, and motivation. Furthermore, we draw on data collected from cognitive think-aloud interviews to show that students can, with the appropriate prompts, engage in the important epistemic activity of critique. We conclude by examining the implications for the teaching and learning of science. In essence, we argue that the undervaluing of critique within the curriculum and pedagogy of school science results in a failure to develop the analytical faculties which are the valued hall mark of the practicing scientist; a misrepresentation of the nature of science; and, more importantly, a less effective learning experience. Critique, therefore, needs to play a central role in the teaching and learning of science.

KW - Argumentation

KW - Questioning

KW - Reasoning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84930929929&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84930929929&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/09500693.2015.1043598

DO - 10.1080/09500693.2015.1043598

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84930929929

VL - 37

SP - 1668

EP - 1697

JO - International Journal of Science Education

JF - International Journal of Science Education

SN - 0950-0693

IS - 10

ER -