TY - JOUR
T1 - Beyond Castañeda and the “language barrier” ideology
T2 - young children and their right to bilingualism
AU - Castro, Dina C.
AU - Meek, Shantel
N1 - Funding Information:
The nation’s child care system is primarily funded by parent tuition and through the federal government via the Child Care and Development Block Grant (CCDBG), a federal block grant overseen by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ (HHS) Office of Child Care. Because of the nature of block grants, the system is primarily state managed, with minimal federal standards. The Head Start program, on the other hand, is almost entirely federally funded and is overseen by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of Head Start. The program has robust federal standards that are carried out by grantees at the local level, including community-based organizations, school districts, and cities, among others. The Pre-Kindergarten system is primarily state funded and managed, with minimal federal funding and oversight. Standards and supports specifically for bilingual children vary across each of these systems.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.
PY - 2022/9
Y1 - 2022/9
N2 - Forty years ago, the Castañeda v. Pickard landmark case marked an important milestone in the fight for equitable education for English learners1 in law, and for the first time linked theory, resources, and outcomes. Notwithstanding the important progress it marked in advocating for greater resources for English learners and accountability for education systems, the central goal of the Castañeda Standard, to “overcome language barriers that impede equal participation in educational programs” is fundamentally flawed. Language, in its essence, is not a barrier but a human characteristic and a strength, and knowledge of the English language, specifically, should not be the exclusive route to attain equal participation in education programs. In this article, we discuss the importance of the Castaňeda Standard and importantly, how we can build from its foundation toward more equitable learning systems, with a central focus on the early care and education system, which has thus far, been left out of formal standards and accountability for bilingual children, with some exceptions. We ground our discussion in the central tenet that improving standards must move away from the “language barrier ideology” to perceiving language as a strength to build on, and to include bilingualism and biliteracy as a central goal of learning systems, shifting away from an exclusive English learning focus. We discuss the importance of bringing a larger degree of objectivity, grounded in current science, to guide implementation. We track the same three pillars established by the Castaňeda Standard 40 years ago and further develop how these could apply to the early care and education systems that serve the youngest bilingual learners.
AB - Forty years ago, the Castañeda v. Pickard landmark case marked an important milestone in the fight for equitable education for English learners1 in law, and for the first time linked theory, resources, and outcomes. Notwithstanding the important progress it marked in advocating for greater resources for English learners and accountability for education systems, the central goal of the Castañeda Standard, to “overcome language barriers that impede equal participation in educational programs” is fundamentally flawed. Language, in its essence, is not a barrier but a human characteristic and a strength, and knowledge of the English language, specifically, should not be the exclusive route to attain equal participation in education programs. In this article, we discuss the importance of the Castaňeda Standard and importantly, how we can build from its foundation toward more equitable learning systems, with a central focus on the early care and education system, which has thus far, been left out of formal standards and accountability for bilingual children, with some exceptions. We ground our discussion in the central tenet that improving standards must move away from the “language barrier ideology” to perceiving language as a strength to build on, and to include bilingualism and biliteracy as a central goal of learning systems, shifting away from an exclusive English learning focus. We discuss the importance of bringing a larger degree of objectivity, grounded in current science, to guide implementation. We track the same three pillars established by the Castaňeda Standard 40 years ago and further develop how these could apply to the early care and education systems that serve the youngest bilingual learners.
KW - Bilingual children
KW - Castañeda
KW - Dual language learners
KW - Early care and education
KW - Early childhood
KW - English learners
KW - Language Standard
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85122310347&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85122310347&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10993-021-09608-x
DO - 10.1007/s10993-021-09608-x
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85122310347
SN - 1568-4555
VL - 21
SP - 407
EP - 425
JO - Language Policy
JF - Language Policy
IS - 3
ER -