Between Assembly and Crown: The Debate over Jewish Taxation in Jamaica (1692-1740)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article explores the issue of discriminatory taxation against colonial Jamaican Jews and the trans-Atlantic Jewish lobby. Based on colonial correspondences, this article makes two main arguments. First, Collective Jewish taxation was debated in colonial correspondences to a far greater extent than its actual financial significance, as it became an issue symbolic of the growing rift between the Jamaican Assembly and the Board of Trade/Crown. Second, while Caribbean Jewish communities are usually understood as satellite dependencies on the Western Sephardic metropoles of Amsterdam or London, placing the Jewish tax in local Jamaican context reveals that colonial Jews deferred to Europe to intercede on their behalf by necessity rather than default. When local circumstances favored the Jews they attempted to lobby against it themselves.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)196-219
Number of pages24
JournalJournal of Early American History
Volume6
Issue number2-3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Jamaica
taxation
Jew
lobby
taxes
community
Colonies
Taxation
Jews
Lobbies

Keywords

  • Colonial American Jews
  • Colonial Jamaica
  • Colonial Taxation Policy
  • Western Sephardic Diaspora

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cultural Studies
  • History

Cite this

Between Assembly and Crown : The Debate over Jewish Taxation in Jamaica (1692-1740). / Mirvis, Stanley.

In: Journal of Early American History, Vol. 6, No. 2-3, 01.01.2016, p. 196-219.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{aee85e304f5548999d0e25f123e51ab9,
title = "Between Assembly and Crown: The Debate over Jewish Taxation in Jamaica (1692-1740)",
abstract = "This article explores the issue of discriminatory taxation against colonial Jamaican Jews and the trans-Atlantic Jewish lobby. Based on colonial correspondences, this article makes two main arguments. First, Collective Jewish taxation was debated in colonial correspondences to a far greater extent than its actual financial significance, as it became an issue symbolic of the growing rift between the Jamaican Assembly and the Board of Trade/Crown. Second, while Caribbean Jewish communities are usually understood as satellite dependencies on the Western Sephardic metropoles of Amsterdam or London, placing the Jewish tax in local Jamaican context reveals that colonial Jews deferred to Europe to intercede on their behalf by necessity rather than default. When local circumstances favored the Jews they attempted to lobby against it themselves.",
keywords = "Colonial American Jews, Colonial Jamaica, Colonial Taxation Policy, Western Sephardic Diaspora",
author = "Stanley Mirvis",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1163/18770703-00603011",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "196--219",
journal = "Journal of Early American History",
issn = "1877-0223",
publisher = "Brill",
number = "2-3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Between Assembly and Crown

T2 - The Debate over Jewish Taxation in Jamaica (1692-1740)

AU - Mirvis, Stanley

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - This article explores the issue of discriminatory taxation against colonial Jamaican Jews and the trans-Atlantic Jewish lobby. Based on colonial correspondences, this article makes two main arguments. First, Collective Jewish taxation was debated in colonial correspondences to a far greater extent than its actual financial significance, as it became an issue symbolic of the growing rift between the Jamaican Assembly and the Board of Trade/Crown. Second, while Caribbean Jewish communities are usually understood as satellite dependencies on the Western Sephardic metropoles of Amsterdam or London, placing the Jewish tax in local Jamaican context reveals that colonial Jews deferred to Europe to intercede on their behalf by necessity rather than default. When local circumstances favored the Jews they attempted to lobby against it themselves.

AB - This article explores the issue of discriminatory taxation against colonial Jamaican Jews and the trans-Atlantic Jewish lobby. Based on colonial correspondences, this article makes two main arguments. First, Collective Jewish taxation was debated in colonial correspondences to a far greater extent than its actual financial significance, as it became an issue symbolic of the growing rift between the Jamaican Assembly and the Board of Trade/Crown. Second, while Caribbean Jewish communities are usually understood as satellite dependencies on the Western Sephardic metropoles of Amsterdam or London, placing the Jewish tax in local Jamaican context reveals that colonial Jews deferred to Europe to intercede on their behalf by necessity rather than default. When local circumstances favored the Jews they attempted to lobby against it themselves.

KW - Colonial American Jews

KW - Colonial Jamaica

KW - Colonial Taxation Policy

KW - Western Sephardic Diaspora

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84999751879&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84999751879&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1163/18770703-00603011

DO - 10.1163/18770703-00603011

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84999751879

VL - 6

SP - 196

EP - 219

JO - Journal of Early American History

JF - Journal of Early American History

SN - 1877-0223

IS - 2-3

ER -