Better instructions for use to improve reusable medical equipment (RME) sterility

Jonathan D. Jolly, Emily A. Hildebrand, Russell Branaghan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: The objective was to evaluate human-factors-based instructional aids on endoscope reprocessing. Background: The project stems from recent failures in reprocessing (cleaning) endoscopes, contributing to the spread of harmful bacterial and viral agents between patients. A previous study discovered three themes that represent a majority of problems: (1) lack of visibility (parts and tools were difficult to identify), (2) high memory demands, and (3) insufficient feedback. Method: In an effort to improve completion rate and reduce error, the authors designed instructional aids utilizing human factors principles that would replace existing manufacturer-provided visual aids. Then, they conducted a usability test, which compared the endoscope reprocessing performance of novices using the standard manufacturer-provided visual aids and the new instructional aids. Results: Participants in the experimental group successfully completed 87.1% of the reprocessing procedure with the use of the instructional aids, compared to 44.7% in the control group using only existing support materials. Of 60 subtasks, 27 showed significant improvement in completion rates. Conclusion: When given an instructional aid designed with human factors principles, participants were able to more successfully complete the reprocessing task. This resulted in an endoscope that was more likely to be safe for use on patients. Application: The human factors design elements utilized to create the instructional aids could be transferred to a dynamic electronic-based system to improve patient safety.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)397-410
Number of pages14
JournalHuman Factors
Volume55
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2013

Fingerprint

reprocessing
Biomedical equipment
Endoscopy
Endoscopes
Human engineering
Infertility
Audiovisual Aids
instruction
Equipment and Supplies
Proxy
Patient Safety
Visibility
Cleaning
Feedback
Data storage equipment
Control Groups
Group
electronics
lack
performance

Keywords

  • human factors
  • IFU
  • infection
  • instructions for use
  • outbreak
  • patient safety
  • reusable device sterility
  • reusable medical equipment
  • RME

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Human Factors and Ergonomics
  • Applied Psychology
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

Better instructions for use to improve reusable medical equipment (RME) sterility. / Jolly, Jonathan D.; Hildebrand, Emily A.; Branaghan, Russell.

In: Human Factors, Vol. 55, No. 2, 04.2013, p. 397-410.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jolly, Jonathan D. ; Hildebrand, Emily A. ; Branaghan, Russell. / Better instructions for use to improve reusable medical equipment (RME) sterility. In: Human Factors. 2013 ; Vol. 55, No. 2. pp. 397-410.
@article{df21715a605445d099bd9478bb3ec981,
title = "Better instructions for use to improve reusable medical equipment (RME) sterility",
abstract = "Objective: The objective was to evaluate human-factors-based instructional aids on endoscope reprocessing. Background: The project stems from recent failures in reprocessing (cleaning) endoscopes, contributing to the spread of harmful bacterial and viral agents between patients. A previous study discovered three themes that represent a majority of problems: (1) lack of visibility (parts and tools were difficult to identify), (2) high memory demands, and (3) insufficient feedback. Method: In an effort to improve completion rate and reduce error, the authors designed instructional aids utilizing human factors principles that would replace existing manufacturer-provided visual aids. Then, they conducted a usability test, which compared the endoscope reprocessing performance of novices using the standard manufacturer-provided visual aids and the new instructional aids. Results: Participants in the experimental group successfully completed 87.1{\%} of the reprocessing procedure with the use of the instructional aids, compared to 44.7{\%} in the control group using only existing support materials. Of 60 subtasks, 27 showed significant improvement in completion rates. Conclusion: When given an instructional aid designed with human factors principles, participants were able to more successfully complete the reprocessing task. This resulted in an endoscope that was more likely to be safe for use on patients. Application: The human factors design elements utilized to create the instructional aids could be transferred to a dynamic electronic-based system to improve patient safety.",
keywords = "human factors, IFU, infection, instructions for use, outbreak, patient safety, reusable device sterility, reusable medical equipment, RME",
author = "Jolly, {Jonathan D.} and Hildebrand, {Emily A.} and Russell Branaghan",
year = "2013",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1177/0018720812456393",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "55",
pages = "397--410",
journal = "Human Factors",
issn = "0018-7208",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Better instructions for use to improve reusable medical equipment (RME) sterility

AU - Jolly, Jonathan D.

AU - Hildebrand, Emily A.

AU - Branaghan, Russell

PY - 2013/4

Y1 - 2013/4

N2 - Objective: The objective was to evaluate human-factors-based instructional aids on endoscope reprocessing. Background: The project stems from recent failures in reprocessing (cleaning) endoscopes, contributing to the spread of harmful bacterial and viral agents between patients. A previous study discovered three themes that represent a majority of problems: (1) lack of visibility (parts and tools were difficult to identify), (2) high memory demands, and (3) insufficient feedback. Method: In an effort to improve completion rate and reduce error, the authors designed instructional aids utilizing human factors principles that would replace existing manufacturer-provided visual aids. Then, they conducted a usability test, which compared the endoscope reprocessing performance of novices using the standard manufacturer-provided visual aids and the new instructional aids. Results: Participants in the experimental group successfully completed 87.1% of the reprocessing procedure with the use of the instructional aids, compared to 44.7% in the control group using only existing support materials. Of 60 subtasks, 27 showed significant improvement in completion rates. Conclusion: When given an instructional aid designed with human factors principles, participants were able to more successfully complete the reprocessing task. This resulted in an endoscope that was more likely to be safe for use on patients. Application: The human factors design elements utilized to create the instructional aids could be transferred to a dynamic electronic-based system to improve patient safety.

AB - Objective: The objective was to evaluate human-factors-based instructional aids on endoscope reprocessing. Background: The project stems from recent failures in reprocessing (cleaning) endoscopes, contributing to the spread of harmful bacterial and viral agents between patients. A previous study discovered three themes that represent a majority of problems: (1) lack of visibility (parts and tools were difficult to identify), (2) high memory demands, and (3) insufficient feedback. Method: In an effort to improve completion rate and reduce error, the authors designed instructional aids utilizing human factors principles that would replace existing manufacturer-provided visual aids. Then, they conducted a usability test, which compared the endoscope reprocessing performance of novices using the standard manufacturer-provided visual aids and the new instructional aids. Results: Participants in the experimental group successfully completed 87.1% of the reprocessing procedure with the use of the instructional aids, compared to 44.7% in the control group using only existing support materials. Of 60 subtasks, 27 showed significant improvement in completion rates. Conclusion: When given an instructional aid designed with human factors principles, participants were able to more successfully complete the reprocessing task. This resulted in an endoscope that was more likely to be safe for use on patients. Application: The human factors design elements utilized to create the instructional aids could be transferred to a dynamic electronic-based system to improve patient safety.

KW - human factors

KW - IFU

KW - infection

KW - instructions for use

KW - outbreak

KW - patient safety

KW - reusable device sterility

KW - reusable medical equipment

KW - RME

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875720123&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84875720123&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0018720812456393

DO - 10.1177/0018720812456393

M3 - Article

C2 - 23691833

AN - SCOPUS:84875720123

VL - 55

SP - 397

EP - 410

JO - Human Factors

JF - Human Factors

SN - 0018-7208

IS - 2

ER -