Being Much Better and No Worse than Others: Deviance Regulation, Self-Guides, and the Motive to be Distinct

Deborah Hall, Hart Blanton, Deborah A. Prentice

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Five studies examined whether the concern for self-other distinction is moderated by self-guide activation, with the predictions based on deviance regulation theory that distinctiveness striving is amplified by activation of ideal self-guides and diminished by activation of ought self-guides. In Study 1, trait differences in self-guides predicted trait differences in self-reported distinctiveness motives. In Studies 2–5, state activation of ought versus ideal self-guides led to shifts in participants' self-reported interest in distinctiveness (Study 2), identification with common versus uncommon social groups (Study 3), preferences for common versus rare consumer products (Study 4), and emotional reactions to distinctiveness versus similarity feedback (Study 5). These findings suggest that self-guide activation can complement known cultural, dispositional, and contextual influences on distinctiveness striving.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)214-232
Number of pages19
JournalSelf and Identity
Volume14
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 4 2015

Fingerprint

Complement Activation

Keywords

  • Deviance regulation theory
  • Distinctiveness striving
  • Regulatory focus theory
  • Self-discrepancy theory
  • Self-guides

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Being Much Better and No Worse than Others : Deviance Regulation, Self-Guides, and the Motive to be Distinct. / Hall, Deborah; Blanton, Hart; Prentice, Deborah A.

In: Self and Identity, Vol. 14, No. 2, 04.03.2015, p. 214-232.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e8e4af66d34d4982a96b556d227880ef,
title = "Being Much Better and No Worse than Others: Deviance Regulation, Self-Guides, and the Motive to be Distinct",
abstract = "Five studies examined whether the concern for self-other distinction is moderated by self-guide activation, with the predictions based on deviance regulation theory that distinctiveness striving is amplified by activation of ideal self-guides and diminished by activation of ought self-guides. In Study 1, trait differences in self-guides predicted trait differences in self-reported distinctiveness motives. In Studies 2–5, state activation of ought versus ideal self-guides led to shifts in participants' self-reported interest in distinctiveness (Study 2), identification with common versus uncommon social groups (Study 3), preferences for common versus rare consumer products (Study 4), and emotional reactions to distinctiveness versus similarity feedback (Study 5). These findings suggest that self-guide activation can complement known cultural, dispositional, and contextual influences on distinctiveness striving.",
keywords = "Deviance regulation theory, Distinctiveness striving, Regulatory focus theory, Self-discrepancy theory, Self-guides",
author = "Deborah Hall and Hart Blanton and Prentice, {Deborah A.}",
year = "2015",
month = "3",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1080/15298868.2014.969302",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "214--232",
journal = "Self and Identity",
issn = "1529-8868",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Being Much Better and No Worse than Others

T2 - Deviance Regulation, Self-Guides, and the Motive to be Distinct

AU - Hall, Deborah

AU - Blanton, Hart

AU - Prentice, Deborah A.

PY - 2015/3/4

Y1 - 2015/3/4

N2 - Five studies examined whether the concern for self-other distinction is moderated by self-guide activation, with the predictions based on deviance regulation theory that distinctiveness striving is amplified by activation of ideal self-guides and diminished by activation of ought self-guides. In Study 1, trait differences in self-guides predicted trait differences in self-reported distinctiveness motives. In Studies 2–5, state activation of ought versus ideal self-guides led to shifts in participants' self-reported interest in distinctiveness (Study 2), identification with common versus uncommon social groups (Study 3), preferences for common versus rare consumer products (Study 4), and emotional reactions to distinctiveness versus similarity feedback (Study 5). These findings suggest that self-guide activation can complement known cultural, dispositional, and contextual influences on distinctiveness striving.

AB - Five studies examined whether the concern for self-other distinction is moderated by self-guide activation, with the predictions based on deviance regulation theory that distinctiveness striving is amplified by activation of ideal self-guides and diminished by activation of ought self-guides. In Study 1, trait differences in self-guides predicted trait differences in self-reported distinctiveness motives. In Studies 2–5, state activation of ought versus ideal self-guides led to shifts in participants' self-reported interest in distinctiveness (Study 2), identification with common versus uncommon social groups (Study 3), preferences for common versus rare consumer products (Study 4), and emotional reactions to distinctiveness versus similarity feedback (Study 5). These findings suggest that self-guide activation can complement known cultural, dispositional, and contextual influences on distinctiveness striving.

KW - Deviance regulation theory

KW - Distinctiveness striving

KW - Regulatory focus theory

KW - Self-discrepancy theory

KW - Self-guides

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84920657269&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84920657269&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/15298868.2014.969302

DO - 10.1080/15298868.2014.969302

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84920657269

VL - 14

SP - 214

EP - 232

JO - Self and Identity

JF - Self and Identity

SN - 1529-8868

IS - 2

ER -