TY - JOUR
T1 - Beginning an Engineer's Journey
T2 - A Narrative Examination of How, When, and Why Students Choose the Engineering Major
AU - Cruz, Joshua
AU - Kellam, Nadia
N1 - Funding Information:
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under grant numbers 1160350 and 1541358. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. We would like to thank those who have contributed to our projects, either as research participants, members of our research groups, or external advisors. In particular, we’d like to thank Joachim Walther, Chad Steacy, Gregory Wilson, and Karen Gerow for their contributions to the interview protocol development and data collection. In addition, we would like to thank Brooke Coley and Audrey Boklage for their contributions to this manuscript, including the initial suggestion to focus on student’s changing their majors into engineering. We are also grateful to the anonymous reviewers and editorial team at JEE for their thoughtful and constructive reviews of this manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 ASEE
PY - 2018/10
Y1 - 2018/10
N2 - Background: While recent engineering education research has focused on the pathways that students take as they transition into engineering programs in higher education, little has explicitly focused on developing an understanding of students as they select and transfer into engineering from other majors. Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to gain a better understanding of how engineering students enter the engineering field by comparing commonalities across their experiences. Given recent literature that describes student dissatisfaction toward, misinformation about, and attrition in engineering programs, we explore the lived experiences of students entering the engineering field, with a particular focus on students changing their majors to engineering. Methods: This paper synthesizes the stories of 21 undergraduate engineering students from a southeastern research university, 15 of whom began their undergraduate program in other majors and transferred into engineering. We employ a unique narrative structuralizing scheme based on Campbell's hero's journey and use the metaphor of the beginning of the journey to understand student trajectories that locate students in engineering studies. Conclusions: With this information, we can better understand student conceptions of the engineering field when they enter; who enters the engineering field and why; how students’ expectations are met or not in engineering programs; and what are the factors that ultimately contribute to first-year retention in engineering programs. In general, students entering engineering tend to have a limited understanding of what is entailed in an engineering program and benefit from interactions with advisors, teachers, and peers in the field. Such interactions may help students to more clearly decide what aspects of engineering are appropriate for them to pursue and help them to persist as they begin coursework.
AB - Background: While recent engineering education research has focused on the pathways that students take as they transition into engineering programs in higher education, little has explicitly focused on developing an understanding of students as they select and transfer into engineering from other majors. Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to gain a better understanding of how engineering students enter the engineering field by comparing commonalities across their experiences. Given recent literature that describes student dissatisfaction toward, misinformation about, and attrition in engineering programs, we explore the lived experiences of students entering the engineering field, with a particular focus on students changing their majors to engineering. Methods: This paper synthesizes the stories of 21 undergraduate engineering students from a southeastern research university, 15 of whom began their undergraduate program in other majors and transferred into engineering. We employ a unique narrative structuralizing scheme based on Campbell's hero's journey and use the metaphor of the beginning of the journey to understand student trajectories that locate students in engineering studies. Conclusions: With this information, we can better understand student conceptions of the engineering field when they enter; who enters the engineering field and why; how students’ expectations are met or not in engineering programs; and what are the factors that ultimately contribute to first-year retention in engineering programs. In general, students entering engineering tend to have a limited understanding of what is entailed in an engineering program and benefit from interactions with advisors, teachers, and peers in the field. Such interactions may help students to more clearly decide what aspects of engineering are appropriate for them to pursue and help them to persist as they begin coursework.
KW - engineering pathways
KW - first-year experience
KW - hero's journey
KW - preparation
KW - student experience
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058015334&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85058015334&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/jee.20234
DO - 10.1002/jee.20234
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85058015334
SN - 1069-4730
VL - 107
SP - 556
EP - 582
JO - Engineering education
JF - Engineering education
IS - 4
ER -