Beck, Asia and second modernity

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The work of Ulrich Beck has been important in bringing sociological attention to the ways issues of risk are embedded in contemporary globalization, in developing a theory of 'reflexive modernization', and in calling for social science to transcend 'methodological nationalism'. In recent studies, he and his colleagues help to correct for the Western bias of many accounts of cosmopolitanism and reflexive modernization, and seek to distinguish normative goals from empirical analysis. In this paper I argue that further clarification of this latter distinction is needed but hard to reach within a framework that still embeds the normative account in the idea that empirical change has a clear direction. Similar issues beset the presentation of diverse patterns in recent history as all variants of 'second modernity'. Lastly, I note that ironically, given the declared 'methodological cosmopolitanism' of the authors, the empirical studies here all focus on national cases.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)597-619
Number of pages23
JournalBritish Journal of Sociology
Volume61
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

reflexive modernization
cosmopolitanism
modernity
nationalism
social science
globalization
trend
history

Keywords

  • Beck
  • Cosmopolitanism
  • Globalization
  • Nationalism
  • Reflexive modernization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Beck, Asia and second modernity. / Calhoun, Craig.

In: British Journal of Sociology, Vol. 61, No. 3, 01.09.2010, p. 597-619.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{946375e9ffa443efaa5fc98f280415b3,
title = "Beck, Asia and second modernity",
abstract = "The work of Ulrich Beck has been important in bringing sociological attention to the ways issues of risk are embedded in contemporary globalization, in developing a theory of 'reflexive modernization', and in calling for social science to transcend 'methodological nationalism'. In recent studies, he and his colleagues help to correct for the Western bias of many accounts of cosmopolitanism and reflexive modernization, and seek to distinguish normative goals from empirical analysis. In this paper I argue that further clarification of this latter distinction is needed but hard to reach within a framework that still embeds the normative account in the idea that empirical change has a clear direction. Similar issues beset the presentation of diverse patterns in recent history as all variants of 'second modernity'. Lastly, I note that ironically, given the declared 'methodological cosmopolitanism' of the authors, the empirical studies here all focus on national cases.",
keywords = "Beck, Cosmopolitanism, Globalization, Nationalism, Reflexive modernization",
author = "Craig Calhoun",
year = "2010",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1468-4446.2010.01328.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "61",
pages = "597--619",
journal = "British Journal of Sociology",
issn = "0007-1315",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Beck, Asia and second modernity

AU - Calhoun, Craig

PY - 2010/9/1

Y1 - 2010/9/1

N2 - The work of Ulrich Beck has been important in bringing sociological attention to the ways issues of risk are embedded in contemporary globalization, in developing a theory of 'reflexive modernization', and in calling for social science to transcend 'methodological nationalism'. In recent studies, he and his colleagues help to correct for the Western bias of many accounts of cosmopolitanism and reflexive modernization, and seek to distinguish normative goals from empirical analysis. In this paper I argue that further clarification of this latter distinction is needed but hard to reach within a framework that still embeds the normative account in the idea that empirical change has a clear direction. Similar issues beset the presentation of diverse patterns in recent history as all variants of 'second modernity'. Lastly, I note that ironically, given the declared 'methodological cosmopolitanism' of the authors, the empirical studies here all focus on national cases.

AB - The work of Ulrich Beck has been important in bringing sociological attention to the ways issues of risk are embedded in contemporary globalization, in developing a theory of 'reflexive modernization', and in calling for social science to transcend 'methodological nationalism'. In recent studies, he and his colleagues help to correct for the Western bias of many accounts of cosmopolitanism and reflexive modernization, and seek to distinguish normative goals from empirical analysis. In this paper I argue that further clarification of this latter distinction is needed but hard to reach within a framework that still embeds the normative account in the idea that empirical change has a clear direction. Similar issues beset the presentation of diverse patterns in recent history as all variants of 'second modernity'. Lastly, I note that ironically, given the declared 'methodological cosmopolitanism' of the authors, the empirical studies here all focus on national cases.

KW - Beck

KW - Cosmopolitanism

KW - Globalization

KW - Nationalism

KW - Reflexive modernization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77956568534&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77956568534&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1468-4446.2010.01328.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1468-4446.2010.01328.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 20840434

AN - SCOPUS:77956568534

VL - 61

SP - 597

EP - 619

JO - British Journal of Sociology

JF - British Journal of Sociology

SN - 0007-1315

IS - 3

ER -