BEAM-FORMING ERRORS in MURCHISON WIDEFIELD ARRAY PHASED ARRAY ANTENNAS and THEIR EFFECTS on EPOCH of REIONIZATION SCIENCE

Abraham R. Neben, Jacqueline N. Hewitt, Richard F. Bradley, Joshua S. Dillon, G. Bernardi, Judd Bowman, F. Briggs, R. J. Cappallo, B. E. Corey, A. A. Deshpande, R. Goeke, L. J. Greenhill, B. J. Hazelton, M. Johnston-Hollitt, D. L. Kaplan, C. J. Lonsdale, S. R. McWhirter, D. A. Mitchell, M. F. Morales, E. MorganD. Oberoi, S. M. Ord, T. Prabu, N. Udaya Shankar, K. S. Srivani, R. Subrahmanyan, S. J. Tingay, R. B. Wayth, R. L. Webster, A. Williams, C. L. Williams

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Accurate antenna beam models are critical for radio observations aiming to isolate the redshifted 21 cm spectral line emission from the Dark Ages and the Epoch of Reionization (EOR) and unlock the scientific potential of 21 cm cosmology. Past work has focused on characterizing mean antenna beam models using either satellite signals or astronomical sources as calibrators, but antenna-to-antenna variation due to imperfect instrumentation has remained unexplored. We characterize this variation for the Murchison Widefield Array (MWA) through laboratory measurements and simulations, finding typical deviations of the order of ±10%-20% near the edges of the main lobe and in the sidelobes. We consider the ramifications of these results for image- and power spectrum-based science. In particular, we simulate visibilities measured by a 100 m baseline and find that using an otherwise perfect foreground model, unmodeled beam-forming errors severely limit foreground subtraction accuracy within the region of Fourier space contaminated by foreground emission (the "wedge"). This region likely contains much of the cosmological signal, and accessing it will require measurement of per-antenna beam patterns. However, unmodeled beam-forming errors do not contaminate the Fourier space region expected to be free of foreground contamination (the "EOR window"), showing that foreground avoidance remains a viable strategy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number44
JournalAstrophysical Journal
Volume820
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 20 2016

Fingerprint

phased arrays
antenna
antennas
beamforming
time measurement
radio observation
sidelobes
avoidance
cosmology
visibility
subtraction
lobes
wedges
instrumentation
line spectra
power spectra
contamination
radio
deviation
simulation

Keywords

  • cosmology: observations
  • dark ages, reionization, first stars
  • instrumentation: interferometers
  • methods: statistical
  • techniques: interferometric

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Space and Planetary Science
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics

Cite this

BEAM-FORMING ERRORS in MURCHISON WIDEFIELD ARRAY PHASED ARRAY ANTENNAS and THEIR EFFECTS on EPOCH of REIONIZATION SCIENCE. / Neben, Abraham R.; Hewitt, Jacqueline N.; Bradley, Richard F.; Dillon, Joshua S.; Bernardi, G.; Bowman, Judd; Briggs, F.; Cappallo, R. J.; Corey, B. E.; Deshpande, A. A.; Goeke, R.; Greenhill, L. J.; Hazelton, B. J.; Johnston-Hollitt, M.; Kaplan, D. L.; Lonsdale, C. J.; McWhirter, S. R.; Mitchell, D. A.; Morales, M. F.; Morgan, E.; Oberoi, D.; Ord, S. M.; Prabu, T.; Shankar, N. Udaya; Srivani, K. S.; Subrahmanyan, R.; Tingay, S. J.; Wayth, R. B.; Webster, R. L.; Williams, A.; Williams, C. L.

In: Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 820, No. 1, 44, 20.03.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Neben, AR, Hewitt, JN, Bradley, RF, Dillon, JS, Bernardi, G, Bowman, J, Briggs, F, Cappallo, RJ, Corey, BE, Deshpande, AA, Goeke, R, Greenhill, LJ, Hazelton, BJ, Johnston-Hollitt, M, Kaplan, DL, Lonsdale, CJ, McWhirter, SR, Mitchell, DA, Morales, MF, Morgan, E, Oberoi, D, Ord, SM, Prabu, T, Shankar, NU, Srivani, KS, Subrahmanyan, R, Tingay, SJ, Wayth, RB, Webster, RL, Williams, A & Williams, CL 2016, 'BEAM-FORMING ERRORS in MURCHISON WIDEFIELD ARRAY PHASED ARRAY ANTENNAS and THEIR EFFECTS on EPOCH of REIONIZATION SCIENCE', Astrophysical Journal, vol. 820, no. 1, 44. https://doi.org/10.3847/0004-637X/820/1/44
Neben, Abraham R. ; Hewitt, Jacqueline N. ; Bradley, Richard F. ; Dillon, Joshua S. ; Bernardi, G. ; Bowman, Judd ; Briggs, F. ; Cappallo, R. J. ; Corey, B. E. ; Deshpande, A. A. ; Goeke, R. ; Greenhill, L. J. ; Hazelton, B. J. ; Johnston-Hollitt, M. ; Kaplan, D. L. ; Lonsdale, C. J. ; McWhirter, S. R. ; Mitchell, D. A. ; Morales, M. F. ; Morgan, E. ; Oberoi, D. ; Ord, S. M. ; Prabu, T. ; Shankar, N. Udaya ; Srivani, K. S. ; Subrahmanyan, R. ; Tingay, S. J. ; Wayth, R. B. ; Webster, R. L. ; Williams, A. ; Williams, C. L. / BEAM-FORMING ERRORS in MURCHISON WIDEFIELD ARRAY PHASED ARRAY ANTENNAS and THEIR EFFECTS on EPOCH of REIONIZATION SCIENCE. In: Astrophysical Journal. 2016 ; Vol. 820, No. 1.
@article{c5708efefb3b455a9a362c87d1d3d401,
title = "BEAM-FORMING ERRORS in MURCHISON WIDEFIELD ARRAY PHASED ARRAY ANTENNAS and THEIR EFFECTS on EPOCH of REIONIZATION SCIENCE",
abstract = "Accurate antenna beam models are critical for radio observations aiming to isolate the redshifted 21 cm spectral line emission from the Dark Ages and the Epoch of Reionization (EOR) and unlock the scientific potential of 21 cm cosmology. Past work has focused on characterizing mean antenna beam models using either satellite signals or astronomical sources as calibrators, but antenna-to-antenna variation due to imperfect instrumentation has remained unexplored. We characterize this variation for the Murchison Widefield Array (MWA) through laboratory measurements and simulations, finding typical deviations of the order of ±10{\%}-20{\%} near the edges of the main lobe and in the sidelobes. We consider the ramifications of these results for image- and power spectrum-based science. In particular, we simulate visibilities measured by a 100 m baseline and find that using an otherwise perfect foreground model, unmodeled beam-forming errors severely limit foreground subtraction accuracy within the region of Fourier space contaminated by foreground emission (the {"}wedge{"}). This region likely contains much of the cosmological signal, and accessing it will require measurement of per-antenna beam patterns. However, unmodeled beam-forming errors do not contaminate the Fourier space region expected to be free of foreground contamination (the {"}EOR window{"}), showing that foreground avoidance remains a viable strategy.",
keywords = "cosmology: observations, dark ages, reionization, first stars, instrumentation: interferometers, methods: statistical, techniques: interferometric",
author = "Neben, {Abraham R.} and Hewitt, {Jacqueline N.} and Bradley, {Richard F.} and Dillon, {Joshua S.} and G. Bernardi and Judd Bowman and F. Briggs and Cappallo, {R. J.} and Corey, {B. E.} and Deshpande, {A. A.} and R. Goeke and Greenhill, {L. J.} and Hazelton, {B. J.} and M. Johnston-Hollitt and Kaplan, {D. L.} and Lonsdale, {C. J.} and McWhirter, {S. R.} and Mitchell, {D. A.} and Morales, {M. F.} and E. Morgan and D. Oberoi and Ord, {S. M.} and T. Prabu and Shankar, {N. Udaya} and Srivani, {K. S.} and R. Subrahmanyan and Tingay, {S. J.} and Wayth, {R. B.} and Webster, {R. L.} and A. Williams and Williams, {C. L.}",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "20",
doi = "10.3847/0004-637X/820/1/44",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "820",
journal = "Astrophysical Journal",
issn = "0004-637X",
publisher = "IOP Publishing Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - BEAM-FORMING ERRORS in MURCHISON WIDEFIELD ARRAY PHASED ARRAY ANTENNAS and THEIR EFFECTS on EPOCH of REIONIZATION SCIENCE

AU - Neben, Abraham R.

AU - Hewitt, Jacqueline N.

AU - Bradley, Richard F.

AU - Dillon, Joshua S.

AU - Bernardi, G.

AU - Bowman, Judd

AU - Briggs, F.

AU - Cappallo, R. J.

AU - Corey, B. E.

AU - Deshpande, A. A.

AU - Goeke, R.

AU - Greenhill, L. J.

AU - Hazelton, B. J.

AU - Johnston-Hollitt, M.

AU - Kaplan, D. L.

AU - Lonsdale, C. J.

AU - McWhirter, S. R.

AU - Mitchell, D. A.

AU - Morales, M. F.

AU - Morgan, E.

AU - Oberoi, D.

AU - Ord, S. M.

AU - Prabu, T.

AU - Shankar, N. Udaya

AU - Srivani, K. S.

AU - Subrahmanyan, R.

AU - Tingay, S. J.

AU - Wayth, R. B.

AU - Webster, R. L.

AU - Williams, A.

AU - Williams, C. L.

PY - 2016/3/20

Y1 - 2016/3/20

N2 - Accurate antenna beam models are critical for radio observations aiming to isolate the redshifted 21 cm spectral line emission from the Dark Ages and the Epoch of Reionization (EOR) and unlock the scientific potential of 21 cm cosmology. Past work has focused on characterizing mean antenna beam models using either satellite signals or astronomical sources as calibrators, but antenna-to-antenna variation due to imperfect instrumentation has remained unexplored. We characterize this variation for the Murchison Widefield Array (MWA) through laboratory measurements and simulations, finding typical deviations of the order of ±10%-20% near the edges of the main lobe and in the sidelobes. We consider the ramifications of these results for image- and power spectrum-based science. In particular, we simulate visibilities measured by a 100 m baseline and find that using an otherwise perfect foreground model, unmodeled beam-forming errors severely limit foreground subtraction accuracy within the region of Fourier space contaminated by foreground emission (the "wedge"). This region likely contains much of the cosmological signal, and accessing it will require measurement of per-antenna beam patterns. However, unmodeled beam-forming errors do not contaminate the Fourier space region expected to be free of foreground contamination (the "EOR window"), showing that foreground avoidance remains a viable strategy.

AB - Accurate antenna beam models are critical for radio observations aiming to isolate the redshifted 21 cm spectral line emission from the Dark Ages and the Epoch of Reionization (EOR) and unlock the scientific potential of 21 cm cosmology. Past work has focused on characterizing mean antenna beam models using either satellite signals or astronomical sources as calibrators, but antenna-to-antenna variation due to imperfect instrumentation has remained unexplored. We characterize this variation for the Murchison Widefield Array (MWA) through laboratory measurements and simulations, finding typical deviations of the order of ±10%-20% near the edges of the main lobe and in the sidelobes. We consider the ramifications of these results for image- and power spectrum-based science. In particular, we simulate visibilities measured by a 100 m baseline and find that using an otherwise perfect foreground model, unmodeled beam-forming errors severely limit foreground subtraction accuracy within the region of Fourier space contaminated by foreground emission (the "wedge"). This region likely contains much of the cosmological signal, and accessing it will require measurement of per-antenna beam patterns. However, unmodeled beam-forming errors do not contaminate the Fourier space region expected to be free of foreground contamination (the "EOR window"), showing that foreground avoidance remains a viable strategy.

KW - cosmology: observations

KW - dark ages, reionization, first stars

KW - instrumentation: interferometers

KW - methods: statistical

KW - techniques: interferometric

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84961575965&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84961575965&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3847/0004-637X/820/1/44

DO - 10.3847/0004-637X/820/1/44

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84961575965

VL - 820

JO - Astrophysical Journal

JF - Astrophysical Journal

SN - 0004-637X

IS - 1

M1 - 44

ER -