Bayesian estimation of competitiveness in male house finches

Small-billed males are more competitive

Masaru Hasegawa, Mathieu Giraudeau, Nobuyuki Kutsukake, Mamoru Watanabe, Kevin McGraw

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

A common method for assessing the competitiveness of animals, especially in birds, is to pit pairs of unfamiliar individuals against each other in contests for limited resources under controlled conditions. Although this approach can clarify dominant-subordinate relationships within dyads, it is often difficult to determine competitiveness for a large group of individuals. Here, by using Bayesian statistical inference and 'hypothetical competition groups', which are formed when individuals experience a series of paired contests, we estimated social competitiveness of male house finches, Haemorhous mexicanus. First, Bayesian competitiveness estimates from paired contests successfully predicted future contest outcomes among four unfamiliar individuals (i.e. social dominance). When data of all rank combinations were pooled, future dominant males had, on average, higher competitiveness estimates than future subordinate males. Similarly, Bayesian statistical inference and hypothetical competition groups identified accurately the relative competitiveness of four subgroups of males (i.e. colourful and drab males from urban and rural sites), which matched the result of direct contests when they were all put into the same cage. This consistency reinforces the validity of Bayesian competitiveness estimation based on hypothetical competition groups. Moreover, we found that the competitiveness estimate was negatively linked to male beak size in the Bayesian framework. Males with smaller bills were more competitive than those with larger bills, perhaps due to their elevated foraging motivation (i.e. limited ability to consume or husk large, valuable seeds). We argue that Bayesian competitiveness estimations, together with a series of paired contests, is a sophisticated approach for acquiring a broad understanding of social and individual competitiveness.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)207-214
Number of pages8
JournalAnimal Behaviour
Volume108
DOIs
StatePublished - 2015

Fingerprint

competitiveness
social dominance
beak
Carpodacus mexicanus
hulls
cages
foraging
birds
seeds
bird
seed
animals
animal
resource

Keywords

  • Aggression
  • Bayesian approach
  • Bill size
  • Dominance
  • Haemorhous mexicanus
  • Latent variable

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cite this

Bayesian estimation of competitiveness in male house finches : Small-billed males are more competitive. / Hasegawa, Masaru; Giraudeau, Mathieu; Kutsukake, Nobuyuki; Watanabe, Mamoru; McGraw, Kevin.

In: Animal Behaviour, Vol. 108, 2015, p. 207-214.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hasegawa, Masaru ; Giraudeau, Mathieu ; Kutsukake, Nobuyuki ; Watanabe, Mamoru ; McGraw, Kevin. / Bayesian estimation of competitiveness in male house finches : Small-billed males are more competitive. In: Animal Behaviour. 2015 ; Vol. 108. pp. 207-214.
@article{95fefde407314ce2bd77124486196132,
title = "Bayesian estimation of competitiveness in male house finches: Small-billed males are more competitive",
abstract = "A common method for assessing the competitiveness of animals, especially in birds, is to pit pairs of unfamiliar individuals against each other in contests for limited resources under controlled conditions. Although this approach can clarify dominant-subordinate relationships within dyads, it is often difficult to determine competitiveness for a large group of individuals. Here, by using Bayesian statistical inference and 'hypothetical competition groups', which are formed when individuals experience a series of paired contests, we estimated social competitiveness of male house finches, Haemorhous mexicanus. First, Bayesian competitiveness estimates from paired contests successfully predicted future contest outcomes among four unfamiliar individuals (i.e. social dominance). When data of all rank combinations were pooled, future dominant males had, on average, higher competitiveness estimates than future subordinate males. Similarly, Bayesian statistical inference and hypothetical competition groups identified accurately the relative competitiveness of four subgroups of males (i.e. colourful and drab males from urban and rural sites), which matched the result of direct contests when they were all put into the same cage. This consistency reinforces the validity of Bayesian competitiveness estimation based on hypothetical competition groups. Moreover, we found that the competitiveness estimate was negatively linked to male beak size in the Bayesian framework. Males with smaller bills were more competitive than those with larger bills, perhaps due to their elevated foraging motivation (i.e. limited ability to consume or husk large, valuable seeds). We argue that Bayesian competitiveness estimations, together with a series of paired contests, is a sophisticated approach for acquiring a broad understanding of social and individual competitiveness.",
keywords = "Aggression, Bayesian approach, Bill size, Dominance, Haemorhous mexicanus, Latent variable",
author = "Masaru Hasegawa and Mathieu Giraudeau and Nobuyuki Kutsukake and Mamoru Watanabe and Kevin McGraw",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.07.027",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "108",
pages = "207--214",
journal = "Animal Behaviour",
issn = "0003-3472",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bayesian estimation of competitiveness in male house finches

T2 - Small-billed males are more competitive

AU - Hasegawa, Masaru

AU - Giraudeau, Mathieu

AU - Kutsukake, Nobuyuki

AU - Watanabe, Mamoru

AU - McGraw, Kevin

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - A common method for assessing the competitiveness of animals, especially in birds, is to pit pairs of unfamiliar individuals against each other in contests for limited resources under controlled conditions. Although this approach can clarify dominant-subordinate relationships within dyads, it is often difficult to determine competitiveness for a large group of individuals. Here, by using Bayesian statistical inference and 'hypothetical competition groups', which are formed when individuals experience a series of paired contests, we estimated social competitiveness of male house finches, Haemorhous mexicanus. First, Bayesian competitiveness estimates from paired contests successfully predicted future contest outcomes among four unfamiliar individuals (i.e. social dominance). When data of all rank combinations were pooled, future dominant males had, on average, higher competitiveness estimates than future subordinate males. Similarly, Bayesian statistical inference and hypothetical competition groups identified accurately the relative competitiveness of four subgroups of males (i.e. colourful and drab males from urban and rural sites), which matched the result of direct contests when they were all put into the same cage. This consistency reinforces the validity of Bayesian competitiveness estimation based on hypothetical competition groups. Moreover, we found that the competitiveness estimate was negatively linked to male beak size in the Bayesian framework. Males with smaller bills were more competitive than those with larger bills, perhaps due to their elevated foraging motivation (i.e. limited ability to consume or husk large, valuable seeds). We argue that Bayesian competitiveness estimations, together with a series of paired contests, is a sophisticated approach for acquiring a broad understanding of social and individual competitiveness.

AB - A common method for assessing the competitiveness of animals, especially in birds, is to pit pairs of unfamiliar individuals against each other in contests for limited resources under controlled conditions. Although this approach can clarify dominant-subordinate relationships within dyads, it is often difficult to determine competitiveness for a large group of individuals. Here, by using Bayesian statistical inference and 'hypothetical competition groups', which are formed when individuals experience a series of paired contests, we estimated social competitiveness of male house finches, Haemorhous mexicanus. First, Bayesian competitiveness estimates from paired contests successfully predicted future contest outcomes among four unfamiliar individuals (i.e. social dominance). When data of all rank combinations were pooled, future dominant males had, on average, higher competitiveness estimates than future subordinate males. Similarly, Bayesian statistical inference and hypothetical competition groups identified accurately the relative competitiveness of four subgroups of males (i.e. colourful and drab males from urban and rural sites), which matched the result of direct contests when they were all put into the same cage. This consistency reinforces the validity of Bayesian competitiveness estimation based on hypothetical competition groups. Moreover, we found that the competitiveness estimate was negatively linked to male beak size in the Bayesian framework. Males with smaller bills were more competitive than those with larger bills, perhaps due to their elevated foraging motivation (i.e. limited ability to consume or husk large, valuable seeds). We argue that Bayesian competitiveness estimations, together with a series of paired contests, is a sophisticated approach for acquiring a broad understanding of social and individual competitiveness.

KW - Aggression

KW - Bayesian approach

KW - Bill size

KW - Dominance

KW - Haemorhous mexicanus

KW - Latent variable

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84955285005&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84955285005&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.07.027

DO - 10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.07.027

M3 - Article

VL - 108

SP - 207

EP - 214

JO - Animal Behaviour

JF - Animal Behaviour

SN - 0003-3472

ER -