Barriers to acceptance of genetic counseling among primary care physicians

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This research analyzed physicians' attitudes toward and use of genetic counseling. Data were obtained through mailed questionnaires sent to all 445 general and family practitioners, pediatricians, and obstetrician-gynecologists in private practice and involved in direct patient care in Maricopa and Pima Counties, Arizona. Results indicated strong attitudinal support for genetic counseling. Almost all respondents felt that it was a useful and necessary medical service, and most felt that it resulted in more responsible patient decisions. Actual genetic counseling by physicians was comparatively rare, however. The data suggested that the paucity of counseling may have derived from a lack of training in genetics, scarcity of patient requests, and legal naivete. Genetic counseling, amniocentesis, and abortion received the most support from younger physicians, obstetrician-gynecologists, and those who were Jewish, less religious, and had few or no children.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)189-197
Number of pages9
JournalSocial Biology
Volume26
Issue number3
StatePublished - 1979

Fingerprint

counseling
Genetic Counseling
Primary Care Physicians
physicians
acceptance
physician
Physicians
Potassium Iodide
Amniocentesis
Private Practice
pediatricians
medical service
patient care
General Practitioners
Counseling
Patient Care
abortion
questionnaires
Research
questionnaire

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Demography

Cite this

Barriers to acceptance of genetic counseling among primary care physicians. / Weitz, Rose.

In: Social Biology, Vol. 26, No. 3, 1979, p. 189-197.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3195e2dbd1dd47f9b903f6b834e49314,
title = "Barriers to acceptance of genetic counseling among primary care physicians",
abstract = "This research analyzed physicians' attitudes toward and use of genetic counseling. Data were obtained through mailed questionnaires sent to all 445 general and family practitioners, pediatricians, and obstetrician-gynecologists in private practice and involved in direct patient care in Maricopa and Pima Counties, Arizona. Results indicated strong attitudinal support for genetic counseling. Almost all respondents felt that it was a useful and necessary medical service, and most felt that it resulted in more responsible patient decisions. Actual genetic counseling by physicians was comparatively rare, however. The data suggested that the paucity of counseling may have derived from a lack of training in genetics, scarcity of patient requests, and legal naivete. Genetic counseling, amniocentesis, and abortion received the most support from younger physicians, obstetrician-gynecologists, and those who were Jewish, less religious, and had few or no children.",
author = "Rose Weitz",
year = "1979",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "189--197",
journal = "Biodemography and Social Biology",
issn = "1948-5565",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Barriers to acceptance of genetic counseling among primary care physicians

AU - Weitz, Rose

PY - 1979

Y1 - 1979

N2 - This research analyzed physicians' attitudes toward and use of genetic counseling. Data were obtained through mailed questionnaires sent to all 445 general and family practitioners, pediatricians, and obstetrician-gynecologists in private practice and involved in direct patient care in Maricopa and Pima Counties, Arizona. Results indicated strong attitudinal support for genetic counseling. Almost all respondents felt that it was a useful and necessary medical service, and most felt that it resulted in more responsible patient decisions. Actual genetic counseling by physicians was comparatively rare, however. The data suggested that the paucity of counseling may have derived from a lack of training in genetics, scarcity of patient requests, and legal naivete. Genetic counseling, amniocentesis, and abortion received the most support from younger physicians, obstetrician-gynecologists, and those who were Jewish, less religious, and had few or no children.

AB - This research analyzed physicians' attitudes toward and use of genetic counseling. Data were obtained through mailed questionnaires sent to all 445 general and family practitioners, pediatricians, and obstetrician-gynecologists in private practice and involved in direct patient care in Maricopa and Pima Counties, Arizona. Results indicated strong attitudinal support for genetic counseling. Almost all respondents felt that it was a useful and necessary medical service, and most felt that it resulted in more responsible patient decisions. Actual genetic counseling by physicians was comparatively rare, however. The data suggested that the paucity of counseling may have derived from a lack of training in genetics, scarcity of patient requests, and legal naivete. Genetic counseling, amniocentesis, and abortion received the most support from younger physicians, obstetrician-gynecologists, and those who were Jewish, less religious, and had few or no children.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0018584283&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0018584283&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 550298

AN - SCOPUS:0018584283

VL - 26

SP - 189

EP - 197

JO - Biodemography and Social Biology

JF - Biodemography and Social Biology

SN - 1948-5565

IS - 3

ER -