Balancing exploration and exploitation

The moderating role of competitive intensity

Sei Auh, Bulent Menguc

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

304 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Drawing on Miles and Snow's classification of strategy type, this paper addresses the contingency role that competitive intensity plays in explaining the relationship between exploration/exploitation and firm performance. We further refine our firm performance measure into separate measures of effective and efficient firm performance. Our conceptual argument posits that for defenders, exploration will be positively related to effective firm performance while exploitation will be negatively related to efficient firm performance as competitive intensity increases. Conversely, for prospectors, we assert that exploration will be negatively related to effective firm performance, whereas exploitation will be positively associated with efficient firm performance as competition intensifies. Empirical results provide general support for our predictions. The implications for business theory and practice are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1652-1661
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Business Research
Volume58
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Snow
Firm performance
Competitive intensity
Exploration and exploitation

Keywords

  • Competitive intensity
  • Effective firm performance
  • Efficient firm performance
  • Exploitation
  • Exploration
  • Miles and Snow typology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Marketing
  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

Balancing exploration and exploitation : The moderating role of competitive intensity. / Auh, Sei; Menguc, Bulent.

In: Journal of Business Research, Vol. 58, No. 12, 12.2005, p. 1652-1661.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{86f1b181f16f4614b0a4d816cea5b0e8,
title = "Balancing exploration and exploitation: The moderating role of competitive intensity",
abstract = "Drawing on Miles and Snow's classification of strategy type, this paper addresses the contingency role that competitive intensity plays in explaining the relationship between exploration/exploitation and firm performance. We further refine our firm performance measure into separate measures of effective and efficient firm performance. Our conceptual argument posits that for defenders, exploration will be positively related to effective firm performance while exploitation will be negatively related to efficient firm performance as competitive intensity increases. Conversely, for prospectors, we assert that exploration will be negatively related to effective firm performance, whereas exploitation will be positively associated with efficient firm performance as competition intensifies. Empirical results provide general support for our predictions. The implications for business theory and practice are discussed.",
keywords = "Competitive intensity, Effective firm performance, Efficient firm performance, Exploitation, Exploration, Miles and Snow typology",
author = "Sei Auh and Bulent Menguc",
year = "2005",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.jbusres.2004.11.007",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "58",
pages = "1652--1661",
journal = "Journal of Business Research",
issn = "0148-2963",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Balancing exploration and exploitation

T2 - The moderating role of competitive intensity

AU - Auh, Sei

AU - Menguc, Bulent

PY - 2005/12

Y1 - 2005/12

N2 - Drawing on Miles and Snow's classification of strategy type, this paper addresses the contingency role that competitive intensity plays in explaining the relationship between exploration/exploitation and firm performance. We further refine our firm performance measure into separate measures of effective and efficient firm performance. Our conceptual argument posits that for defenders, exploration will be positively related to effective firm performance while exploitation will be negatively related to efficient firm performance as competitive intensity increases. Conversely, for prospectors, we assert that exploration will be negatively related to effective firm performance, whereas exploitation will be positively associated with efficient firm performance as competition intensifies. Empirical results provide general support for our predictions. The implications for business theory and practice are discussed.

AB - Drawing on Miles and Snow's classification of strategy type, this paper addresses the contingency role that competitive intensity plays in explaining the relationship between exploration/exploitation and firm performance. We further refine our firm performance measure into separate measures of effective and efficient firm performance. Our conceptual argument posits that for defenders, exploration will be positively related to effective firm performance while exploitation will be negatively related to efficient firm performance as competitive intensity increases. Conversely, for prospectors, we assert that exploration will be negatively related to effective firm performance, whereas exploitation will be positively associated with efficient firm performance as competition intensifies. Empirical results provide general support for our predictions. The implications for business theory and practice are discussed.

KW - Competitive intensity

KW - Effective firm performance

KW - Efficient firm performance

KW - Exploitation

KW - Exploration

KW - Miles and Snow typology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=27744469158&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=27744469158&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jbusres.2004.11.007

DO - 10.1016/j.jbusres.2004.11.007

M3 - Article

VL - 58

SP - 1652

EP - 1661

JO - Journal of Business Research

JF - Journal of Business Research

SN - 0148-2963

IS - 12

ER -