Average vs item response theory scores

an illustration using neighbourhood measures in relation to physical activity in adults with arthritis

T. J. Mielenz, L. F. Callahan, Michael Edwards

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives Our study had two main objectives: 1) to determine whether perceived neighbourhood physical features are associated with physical activity levels in adults with arthritis; and 2) to determine whether the conclusions are more precise when item response theory (IRT) scores are used instead of average scores for the perceived neighbourhood physical features scales. Methods Information on health outcomes, neighbourhood characteristics, and physical activity levels were collected using a telephone survey of 937 participants with self-reported arthritis. Neighbourhood walkability and aesthetic features and physical activity levels were measured by self-report. Adjusted proportional odds models were constructed separately for each neighbourhood physical features scale. Results We found that among adults with arthritis, poorer perceived neighbourhood physical features (both walkability and aesthetics) are associated with decreased physical activity level compared to better perceived neighbourhood features. This association was only observed in our adjusted models when IRT scoring was employed with the neighbourhood physical feature scales (walkability scale: odds ratio [OR] 1.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02, 1.41; aesthetics scale: OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.09, 1.62), not when average scoring was used (walkability scale: OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.00, 1.30; aesthetics scale: OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.00, 1.36). Conclusion In adults with arthritis, those reporting poorer walking and aesthetics features were found to have decreased physical activity levels compared to those reporting better features when IRT scores were used, but not when using average scores. This study may inform public health physical environmental interventions implemented to increase physical activity, especially since arthritis prevalence is expected to be close to 20% of the population in 2020. Based on NIH initiatives, future health research will utilize IRT scores. The differences found in this study may be a precursor for research on how past and future treatment effects may vary between these two types of measurement scores.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)15-21
Number of pages7
JournalPublic Health
Volume142
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Arthritis
Esthetics
Odds Ratio
Confidence Intervals
Health
Research
Telephone
Self Report
Walking
Public Health
Population

Keywords

  • Arthritis
  • Average scores
  • Item response theory scores
  • Perceived neighbourhood physical features
  • Physical activity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Average vs item response theory scores : an illustration using neighbourhood measures in relation to physical activity in adults with arthritis. / Mielenz, T. J.; Callahan, L. F.; Edwards, Michael.

In: Public Health, Vol. 142, 01.01.2017, p. 15-21.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{47b29990255540e8a73817a34c961621,
title = "Average vs item response theory scores: an illustration using neighbourhood measures in relation to physical activity in adults with arthritis",
abstract = "Objectives Our study had two main objectives: 1) to determine whether perceived neighbourhood physical features are associated with physical activity levels in adults with arthritis; and 2) to determine whether the conclusions are more precise when item response theory (IRT) scores are used instead of average scores for the perceived neighbourhood physical features scales. Methods Information on health outcomes, neighbourhood characteristics, and physical activity levels were collected using a telephone survey of 937 participants with self-reported arthritis. Neighbourhood walkability and aesthetic features and physical activity levels were measured by self-report. Adjusted proportional odds models were constructed separately for each neighbourhood physical features scale. Results We found that among adults with arthritis, poorer perceived neighbourhood physical features (both walkability and aesthetics) are associated with decreased physical activity level compared to better perceived neighbourhood features. This association was only observed in our adjusted models when IRT scoring was employed with the neighbourhood physical feature scales (walkability scale: odds ratio [OR] 1.20, 95{\%} confidence interval [CI] 1.02, 1.41; aesthetics scale: OR 1.32, 95{\%} CI 1.09, 1.62), not when average scoring was used (walkability scale: OR 1.14, 95{\%} CI 1.00, 1.30; aesthetics scale: OR 1.16, 95{\%} CI 1.00, 1.36). Conclusion In adults with arthritis, those reporting poorer walking and aesthetics features were found to have decreased physical activity levels compared to those reporting better features when IRT scores were used, but not when using average scores. This study may inform public health physical environmental interventions implemented to increase physical activity, especially since arthritis prevalence is expected to be close to 20{\%} of the population in 2020. Based on NIH initiatives, future health research will utilize IRT scores. The differences found in this study may be a precursor for research on how past and future treatment effects may vary between these two types of measurement scores.",
keywords = "Arthritis, Average scores, Item response theory scores, Perceived neighbourhood physical features, Physical activity",
author = "Mielenz, {T. J.} and Callahan, {L. F.} and Michael Edwards",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.puhe.2016.08.016",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "142",
pages = "15--21",
journal = "Public Health",
issn = "0033-3506",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Average vs item response theory scores

T2 - an illustration using neighbourhood measures in relation to physical activity in adults with arthritis

AU - Mielenz, T. J.

AU - Callahan, L. F.

AU - Edwards, Michael

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Objectives Our study had two main objectives: 1) to determine whether perceived neighbourhood physical features are associated with physical activity levels in adults with arthritis; and 2) to determine whether the conclusions are more precise when item response theory (IRT) scores are used instead of average scores for the perceived neighbourhood physical features scales. Methods Information on health outcomes, neighbourhood characteristics, and physical activity levels were collected using a telephone survey of 937 participants with self-reported arthritis. Neighbourhood walkability and aesthetic features and physical activity levels were measured by self-report. Adjusted proportional odds models were constructed separately for each neighbourhood physical features scale. Results We found that among adults with arthritis, poorer perceived neighbourhood physical features (both walkability and aesthetics) are associated with decreased physical activity level compared to better perceived neighbourhood features. This association was only observed in our adjusted models when IRT scoring was employed with the neighbourhood physical feature scales (walkability scale: odds ratio [OR] 1.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02, 1.41; aesthetics scale: OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.09, 1.62), not when average scoring was used (walkability scale: OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.00, 1.30; aesthetics scale: OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.00, 1.36). Conclusion In adults with arthritis, those reporting poorer walking and aesthetics features were found to have decreased physical activity levels compared to those reporting better features when IRT scores were used, but not when using average scores. This study may inform public health physical environmental interventions implemented to increase physical activity, especially since arthritis prevalence is expected to be close to 20% of the population in 2020. Based on NIH initiatives, future health research will utilize IRT scores. The differences found in this study may be a precursor for research on how past and future treatment effects may vary between these two types of measurement scores.

AB - Objectives Our study had two main objectives: 1) to determine whether perceived neighbourhood physical features are associated with physical activity levels in adults with arthritis; and 2) to determine whether the conclusions are more precise when item response theory (IRT) scores are used instead of average scores for the perceived neighbourhood physical features scales. Methods Information on health outcomes, neighbourhood characteristics, and physical activity levels were collected using a telephone survey of 937 participants with self-reported arthritis. Neighbourhood walkability and aesthetic features and physical activity levels were measured by self-report. Adjusted proportional odds models were constructed separately for each neighbourhood physical features scale. Results We found that among adults with arthritis, poorer perceived neighbourhood physical features (both walkability and aesthetics) are associated with decreased physical activity level compared to better perceived neighbourhood features. This association was only observed in our adjusted models when IRT scoring was employed with the neighbourhood physical feature scales (walkability scale: odds ratio [OR] 1.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02, 1.41; aesthetics scale: OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.09, 1.62), not when average scoring was used (walkability scale: OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.00, 1.30; aesthetics scale: OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.00, 1.36). Conclusion In adults with arthritis, those reporting poorer walking and aesthetics features were found to have decreased physical activity levels compared to those reporting better features when IRT scores were used, but not when using average scores. This study may inform public health physical environmental interventions implemented to increase physical activity, especially since arthritis prevalence is expected to be close to 20% of the population in 2020. Based on NIH initiatives, future health research will utilize IRT scores. The differences found in this study may be a precursor for research on how past and future treatment effects may vary between these two types of measurement scores.

KW - Arthritis

KW - Average scores

KW - Item response theory scores

KW - Perceived neighbourhood physical features

KW - Physical activity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84996587551&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84996587551&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.puhe.2016.08.016

DO - 10.1016/j.puhe.2016.08.016

M3 - Article

VL - 142

SP - 15

EP - 21

JO - Public Health

JF - Public Health

SN - 0033-3506

ER -