Autonomy-Centered Healthcare

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In this paper, I aim to demonstrate that the consequences of the current United States health insurance scheme on both physician and patient autonomy is dire. So dire, in fact, that the only moral solution is something other than what we have now. The United States healthcare system faces much criticism at present. But my focus is particular: I am interested in the ways in which insurance interferes with physician and patient autonomy. (I do not consider The Affordable Care Act much of a change in this aspect of the system, for it still relies heavily on private insurance, albeit often subsidized.) I will argue in favor of an expansion of the traditional conception of what I call “medical autonomy” or “healthcare autonomy” and the usual role it plays in bioethical discussions. More generally, I show that in morally designing or evaluating any healthcare system, serious attention should be paid to how this system helps foster what I call active autonomy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)297-318
Number of pages22
JournalHEC Forum
Volume30
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2018

Fingerprint

autonomy
Insurance
Delivery of Health Care
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Physicians
insurance
Health Insurance
physician
health insurance
criticism
act
present

Keywords

  • Autonomy
  • Healthcare
  • Insurance
  • Patient autonomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects
  • Health(social science)
  • Health Policy

Cite this

Autonomy-Centered Healthcare. / Priest, Maura.

In: HEC Forum, Vol. 30, No. 3, 01.09.2018, p. 297-318.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Priest, Maura. / Autonomy-Centered Healthcare. In: HEC Forum. 2018 ; Vol. 30, No. 3. pp. 297-318.
@article{96231e72a55c48eb963978769fc33876,
title = "Autonomy-Centered Healthcare",
abstract = "In this paper, I aim to demonstrate that the consequences of the current United States health insurance scheme on both physician and patient autonomy is dire. So dire, in fact, that the only moral solution is something other than what we have now. The United States healthcare system faces much criticism at present. But my focus is particular: I am interested in the ways in which insurance interferes with physician and patient autonomy. (I do not consider The Affordable Care Act much of a change in this aspect of the system, for it still relies heavily on private insurance, albeit often subsidized.) I will argue in favor of an expansion of the traditional conception of what I call “medical autonomy” or “healthcare autonomy” and the usual role it plays in bioethical discussions. More generally, I show that in morally designing or evaluating any healthcare system, serious attention should be paid to how this system helps foster what I call active autonomy.",
keywords = "Autonomy, Healthcare, Insurance, Patient autonomy",
author = "Maura Priest",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10730-018-9355-6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "297--318",
journal = "HEC Forum",
issn = "0956-2737",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Autonomy-Centered Healthcare

AU - Priest, Maura

PY - 2018/9/1

Y1 - 2018/9/1

N2 - In this paper, I aim to demonstrate that the consequences of the current United States health insurance scheme on both physician and patient autonomy is dire. So dire, in fact, that the only moral solution is something other than what we have now. The United States healthcare system faces much criticism at present. But my focus is particular: I am interested in the ways in which insurance interferes with physician and patient autonomy. (I do not consider The Affordable Care Act much of a change in this aspect of the system, for it still relies heavily on private insurance, albeit often subsidized.) I will argue in favor of an expansion of the traditional conception of what I call “medical autonomy” or “healthcare autonomy” and the usual role it plays in bioethical discussions. More generally, I show that in morally designing or evaluating any healthcare system, serious attention should be paid to how this system helps foster what I call active autonomy.

AB - In this paper, I aim to demonstrate that the consequences of the current United States health insurance scheme on both physician and patient autonomy is dire. So dire, in fact, that the only moral solution is something other than what we have now. The United States healthcare system faces much criticism at present. But my focus is particular: I am interested in the ways in which insurance interferes with physician and patient autonomy. (I do not consider The Affordable Care Act much of a change in this aspect of the system, for it still relies heavily on private insurance, albeit often subsidized.) I will argue in favor of an expansion of the traditional conception of what I call “medical autonomy” or “healthcare autonomy” and the usual role it plays in bioethical discussions. More generally, I show that in morally designing or evaluating any healthcare system, serious attention should be paid to how this system helps foster what I call active autonomy.

KW - Autonomy

KW - Healthcare

KW - Insurance

KW - Patient autonomy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049851425&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049851425&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10730-018-9355-6

DO - 10.1007/s10730-018-9355-6

M3 - Article

C2 - 30006852

AN - SCOPUS:85049851425

VL - 30

SP - 297

EP - 318

JO - HEC Forum

JF - HEC Forum

SN - 0956-2737

IS - 3

ER -