Automatic correction of ocular artifacts in the EEG: A comparison of regression-based and component-based methods

Garrick L. Wallstrom, Robert E. Kass, Anita Miller, Jeffrey F. Cohn, Nathan A. Fox

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

188 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A variety of procedures have been proposed to correct ocular artifacts in the electroencephalogram (EEG), including methods based on regression, principal components analysis (PCA) and independent component analysis (ICA). The current study compared these three methods, and it evaluated a modified regression approach using Bayesian adaptive regression splines to filter the electrooculogram (EOG) before computing correction factors. We applied each artifact correction procedure to real and simulated EEG data of varying epoch lengths and then quantified the impact of correction on spectral parameters of the EEG. We found that the adaptive filter improved regression-based artifact correction. An automated PCA method effectively reduced ocular artifacts and resulted in minimal spectral distortion, whereas ICA correction appeared to distort power between 5 and 20 Hz. In general, reducing the epoch length improved the accuracy of estimating spectral power in the alpha (7.5-12.5 Hz) and beta (12.5-19.5 Hz) bands, but it worsened the accuracy for power in the theta (3.5-7.5 Hz) band and distorted time domain features. Results supported the use of regression-based and PCA-based ocular artifact correction and suggested a need for further studies examining possible spectral distortion from ICA-based correction procedures.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)105-119
Number of pages15
JournalInternational Journal of Psychophysiology
Volume53
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Artifacts
Electroencephalography
Principal Component Analysis
Electrooculography
Bayes Theorem

Keywords

  • Adaptive filter
  • Analysis
  • Electroencephalography
  • Independent components analysis
  • Ocular artifact
  • Principal components
  • Regression

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

Automatic correction of ocular artifacts in the EEG : A comparison of regression-based and component-based methods. / Wallstrom, Garrick L.; Kass, Robert E.; Miller, Anita; Cohn, Jeffrey F.; Fox, Nathan A.

In: International Journal of Psychophysiology, Vol. 53, No. 2, 07.2004, p. 105-119.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wallstrom, Garrick L. ; Kass, Robert E. ; Miller, Anita ; Cohn, Jeffrey F. ; Fox, Nathan A. / Automatic correction of ocular artifacts in the EEG : A comparison of regression-based and component-based methods. In: International Journal of Psychophysiology. 2004 ; Vol. 53, No. 2. pp. 105-119.
@article{dfd46d81a5f242038693814c1408c91c,
title = "Automatic correction of ocular artifacts in the EEG: A comparison of regression-based and component-based methods",
abstract = "A variety of procedures have been proposed to correct ocular artifacts in the electroencephalogram (EEG), including methods based on regression, principal components analysis (PCA) and independent component analysis (ICA). The current study compared these three methods, and it evaluated a modified regression approach using Bayesian adaptive regression splines to filter the electrooculogram (EOG) before computing correction factors. We applied each artifact correction procedure to real and simulated EEG data of varying epoch lengths and then quantified the impact of correction on spectral parameters of the EEG. We found that the adaptive filter improved regression-based artifact correction. An automated PCA method effectively reduced ocular artifacts and resulted in minimal spectral distortion, whereas ICA correction appeared to distort power between 5 and 20 Hz. In general, reducing the epoch length improved the accuracy of estimating spectral power in the alpha (7.5-12.5 Hz) and beta (12.5-19.5 Hz) bands, but it worsened the accuracy for power in the theta (3.5-7.5 Hz) band and distorted time domain features. Results supported the use of regression-based and PCA-based ocular artifact correction and suggested a need for further studies examining possible spectral distortion from ICA-based correction procedures.",
keywords = "Adaptive filter, Analysis, Electroencephalography, Independent components analysis, Ocular artifact, Principal components, Regression",
author = "Wallstrom, {Garrick L.} and Kass, {Robert E.} and Anita Miller and Cohn, {Jeffrey F.} and Fox, {Nathan A.}",
year = "2004",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2004.03.007",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "53",
pages = "105--119",
journal = "International Journal of Psychophysiology",
issn = "0167-8760",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Automatic correction of ocular artifacts in the EEG

T2 - A comparison of regression-based and component-based methods

AU - Wallstrom, Garrick L.

AU - Kass, Robert E.

AU - Miller, Anita

AU - Cohn, Jeffrey F.

AU - Fox, Nathan A.

PY - 2004/7

Y1 - 2004/7

N2 - A variety of procedures have been proposed to correct ocular artifacts in the electroencephalogram (EEG), including methods based on regression, principal components analysis (PCA) and independent component analysis (ICA). The current study compared these three methods, and it evaluated a modified regression approach using Bayesian adaptive regression splines to filter the electrooculogram (EOG) before computing correction factors. We applied each artifact correction procedure to real and simulated EEG data of varying epoch lengths and then quantified the impact of correction on spectral parameters of the EEG. We found that the adaptive filter improved regression-based artifact correction. An automated PCA method effectively reduced ocular artifacts and resulted in minimal spectral distortion, whereas ICA correction appeared to distort power between 5 and 20 Hz. In general, reducing the epoch length improved the accuracy of estimating spectral power in the alpha (7.5-12.5 Hz) and beta (12.5-19.5 Hz) bands, but it worsened the accuracy for power in the theta (3.5-7.5 Hz) band and distorted time domain features. Results supported the use of regression-based and PCA-based ocular artifact correction and suggested a need for further studies examining possible spectral distortion from ICA-based correction procedures.

AB - A variety of procedures have been proposed to correct ocular artifacts in the electroencephalogram (EEG), including methods based on regression, principal components analysis (PCA) and independent component analysis (ICA). The current study compared these three methods, and it evaluated a modified regression approach using Bayesian adaptive regression splines to filter the electrooculogram (EOG) before computing correction factors. We applied each artifact correction procedure to real and simulated EEG data of varying epoch lengths and then quantified the impact of correction on spectral parameters of the EEG. We found that the adaptive filter improved regression-based artifact correction. An automated PCA method effectively reduced ocular artifacts and resulted in minimal spectral distortion, whereas ICA correction appeared to distort power between 5 and 20 Hz. In general, reducing the epoch length improved the accuracy of estimating spectral power in the alpha (7.5-12.5 Hz) and beta (12.5-19.5 Hz) bands, but it worsened the accuracy for power in the theta (3.5-7.5 Hz) band and distorted time domain features. Results supported the use of regression-based and PCA-based ocular artifact correction and suggested a need for further studies examining possible spectral distortion from ICA-based correction procedures.

KW - Adaptive filter

KW - Analysis

KW - Electroencephalography

KW - Independent components analysis

KW - Ocular artifact

KW - Principal components

KW - Regression

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=2942755691&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=2942755691&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2004.03.007

DO - 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2004.03.007

M3 - Article

C2 - 15210288

AN - SCOPUS:2942755691

VL - 53

SP - 105

EP - 119

JO - International Journal of Psychophysiology

JF - International Journal of Psychophysiology

SN - 0167-8760

IS - 2

ER -