Authorship and the use of biological information in endangered species recovery plans

Leah Gerber, C. B. Schultz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We examined the relationship between authorship and the use of biological information in recovery plans under the U.S. Endangered Species Act. Approximately one-third of recovery plans were written solely by federal government employees, and one-third of plans included authors with university affiliations. The number of plans written strictly by federal staff increased significantly over time, whereas the percentage of plans that included authors with university affiliation remained unchanged. We tested three hypotheses posed by Clark et al. (1994) regarding authorship and endangered species recovery and found that (1) groups of authors from diverse affiliations are likely to strengthen the recovery planning process, (2) recovery plans lacking nonfederal participation suffer from inadequate attention to species biology, and (3) academic affiliation is strongly associated with the use of focal-species biology in recovery plans. Our results suggest that modifying the choice of participants in the recovery planning process may increase the use of biological information in recovery measures recommended in recovery plans and thus influence the eventual success of recovery efforts.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1308-1314
Number of pages7
JournalConservation Biology
Volume15
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

recovery plan
endangered species
planning
Recovery
Biological Sciences
federal government
human resources
planning process
Planning
plan
Personnel

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology
  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation

Cite this

Authorship and the use of biological information in endangered species recovery plans. / Gerber, Leah; Schultz, C. B.

In: Conservation Biology, Vol. 15, No. 5, 2001, p. 1308-1314.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{daf96875f7a1436ba166c5e2dc3bf54c,
title = "Authorship and the use of biological information in endangered species recovery plans",
abstract = "We examined the relationship between authorship and the use of biological information in recovery plans under the U.S. Endangered Species Act. Approximately one-third of recovery plans were written solely by federal government employees, and one-third of plans included authors with university affiliations. The number of plans written strictly by federal staff increased significantly over time, whereas the percentage of plans that included authors with university affiliation remained unchanged. We tested three hypotheses posed by Clark et al. (1994) regarding authorship and endangered species recovery and found that (1) groups of authors from diverse affiliations are likely to strengthen the recovery planning process, (2) recovery plans lacking nonfederal participation suffer from inadequate attention to species biology, and (3) academic affiliation is strongly associated with the use of focal-species biology in recovery plans. Our results suggest that modifying the choice of participants in the recovery planning process may increase the use of biological information in recovery measures recommended in recovery plans and thus influence the eventual success of recovery efforts.",
author = "Leah Gerber and Schultz, {C. B.}",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.00110.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "1308--1314",
journal = "Conservation Biology",
issn = "0888-8892",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Authorship and the use of biological information in endangered species recovery plans

AU - Gerber, Leah

AU - Schultz, C. B.

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - We examined the relationship between authorship and the use of biological information in recovery plans under the U.S. Endangered Species Act. Approximately one-third of recovery plans were written solely by federal government employees, and one-third of plans included authors with university affiliations. The number of plans written strictly by federal staff increased significantly over time, whereas the percentage of plans that included authors with university affiliation remained unchanged. We tested three hypotheses posed by Clark et al. (1994) regarding authorship and endangered species recovery and found that (1) groups of authors from diverse affiliations are likely to strengthen the recovery planning process, (2) recovery plans lacking nonfederal participation suffer from inadequate attention to species biology, and (3) academic affiliation is strongly associated with the use of focal-species biology in recovery plans. Our results suggest that modifying the choice of participants in the recovery planning process may increase the use of biological information in recovery measures recommended in recovery plans and thus influence the eventual success of recovery efforts.

AB - We examined the relationship between authorship and the use of biological information in recovery plans under the U.S. Endangered Species Act. Approximately one-third of recovery plans were written solely by federal government employees, and one-third of plans included authors with university affiliations. The number of plans written strictly by federal staff increased significantly over time, whereas the percentage of plans that included authors with university affiliation remained unchanged. We tested three hypotheses posed by Clark et al. (1994) regarding authorship and endangered species recovery and found that (1) groups of authors from diverse affiliations are likely to strengthen the recovery planning process, (2) recovery plans lacking nonfederal participation suffer from inadequate attention to species biology, and (3) academic affiliation is strongly associated with the use of focal-species biology in recovery plans. Our results suggest that modifying the choice of participants in the recovery planning process may increase the use of biological information in recovery measures recommended in recovery plans and thus influence the eventual success of recovery efforts.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034799241&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034799241&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.00110.x

DO - 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.00110.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0034799241

VL - 15

SP - 1308

EP - 1314

JO - Conservation Biology

JF - Conservation Biology

SN - 0888-8892

IS - 5

ER -