TY - JOUR
T1 - Australians' views on carbon pricing before and after the 2013 federal election
AU - Dreyer, Stacia J.
AU - Walker, Iain
AU - McCoy, Shannon K.
AU - Teisl, Mario F.
N1 - Funding Information:
We gratefully acknowledge funding support by the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation’s Climate Adaptation Flagship; the Maine Sustainability Solutions Initiative (supported by National Science Foundation award EPS-0904155 and Maine EPSCoR at the University of Maine); and the Maine Agricultural and Forest Experiment Station. We also thank the Center for Statistics and the Social Sciences, the Communication and Marketing Team in the College of the Environment (both at the University of Washington), and S. Newcomb for providing feedback on manuscript drafts.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.
PY - 2015/12/1
Y1 - 2015/12/1
N2 - As climate policies change through the legislative process, public attitudes towards them may change as well. Therefore, it is important to assess how people accept and support controversial climate policies as the policies change over time. Policy acceptance is a positive evaluation of, or attitude towards, an existing policy; policy support adds an active behavioural component. Acceptance does not necessarily lead to support. We conducted a national survey of Australian residents to investigate acceptance of, and support for, the Australian carbon pricing policy before and after the 2013 federal election, and how perceptions of the policy, economic ideology, and voting behaviour affect acceptance and support. We found acceptance and support were stable across the election period, which was surprising given that climate policy was highly contentious during the election. Policy acceptance was higher than policy support at both times and acceptance was a necessary but insufficient condition of support. We conclude that acceptance is an important process through which perceptions of the policy and economic ideology influence support. Therefore, future climate policy research needs to distinguish between acceptance and support to better understand this process, and to better measure these concepts.
AB - As climate policies change through the legislative process, public attitudes towards them may change as well. Therefore, it is important to assess how people accept and support controversial climate policies as the policies change over time. Policy acceptance is a positive evaluation of, or attitude towards, an existing policy; policy support adds an active behavioural component. Acceptance does not necessarily lead to support. We conducted a national survey of Australian residents to investigate acceptance of, and support for, the Australian carbon pricing policy before and after the 2013 federal election, and how perceptions of the policy, economic ideology, and voting behaviour affect acceptance and support. We found acceptance and support were stable across the election period, which was surprising given that climate policy was highly contentious during the election. Policy acceptance was higher than policy support at both times and acceptance was a necessary but insufficient condition of support. We conclude that acceptance is an important process through which perceptions of the policy and economic ideology influence support. Therefore, future climate policy research needs to distinguish between acceptance and support to better understand this process, and to better measure these concepts.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84948140932&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84948140932&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/nclimate2756
DO - 10.1038/nclimate2756
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84948140932
SN - 1758-678X
VL - 5
SP - 1064
EP - 1067
JO - Nature Climate Change
JF - Nature Climate Change
IS - 12
ER -