Auditor evaluation of others' credibility: A review of experimental studies on determinants and consequences

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

I synthesize the extant experimental literature examining auditor evaluation of others' credibility published in six top accounting journals over the last three-and-a-half decades. I adapt the original definition of credibility by Hovland, Janis, and Kelley (1953): the extent of perceiving someone as competent and trustworthy. Audit guidance requires auditors to consider credibility of management, internal auditors, and staff, yet the research literature on auditor evaluation of others' credibility is fragmented and scarce, limiting our understanding of determinants and consequences of auditor evaluations. I develop a framework for analysis of research on auditor evaluation of others' credibility and review extant literature by types of examined effects (determinants of credibility vs. consequences of credibility) and by examined credibility components (competence, trustworthiness, or both). Throughout the literature review I suggest areas for future research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Accounting Literature
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Dec 19 2014

Fingerprint

Experimental study
Credibility
Evaluation
Auditors
Literature review
Staff
Trustworthiness
Audit
Guidance

Keywords

  • Consequences of credibility
  • Determinants of credibility
  • Evaluation of competence
  • Evaluation of trustworthiness

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Accounting

Cite this

@article{dd28b0add17449709aae2c33185c0ed3,
title = "Auditor evaluation of others' credibility: A review of experimental studies on determinants and consequences",
abstract = "I synthesize the extant experimental literature examining auditor evaluation of others' credibility published in six top accounting journals over the last three-and-a-half decades. I adapt the original definition of credibility by Hovland, Janis, and Kelley (1953): the extent of perceiving someone as competent and trustworthy. Audit guidance requires auditors to consider credibility of management, internal auditors, and staff, yet the research literature on auditor evaluation of others' credibility is fragmented and scarce, limiting our understanding of determinants and consequences of auditor evaluations. I develop a framework for analysis of research on auditor evaluation of others' credibility and review extant literature by types of examined effects (determinants of credibility vs. consequences of credibility) and by examined credibility components (competence, trustworthiness, or both). Throughout the literature review I suggest areas for future research.",
keywords = "Consequences of credibility, Determinants of credibility, Evaluation of competence, Evaluation of trustworthiness",
author = "Eldar Maksymov",
year = "2014",
month = "12",
day = "19",
doi = "10.1016/j.acclit.2015.10.003",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of Accounting Literature",
issn = "0737-4607",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Auditor evaluation of others' credibility

T2 - A review of experimental studies on determinants and consequences

AU - Maksymov, Eldar

PY - 2014/12/19

Y1 - 2014/12/19

N2 - I synthesize the extant experimental literature examining auditor evaluation of others' credibility published in six top accounting journals over the last three-and-a-half decades. I adapt the original definition of credibility by Hovland, Janis, and Kelley (1953): the extent of perceiving someone as competent and trustworthy. Audit guidance requires auditors to consider credibility of management, internal auditors, and staff, yet the research literature on auditor evaluation of others' credibility is fragmented and scarce, limiting our understanding of determinants and consequences of auditor evaluations. I develop a framework for analysis of research on auditor evaluation of others' credibility and review extant literature by types of examined effects (determinants of credibility vs. consequences of credibility) and by examined credibility components (competence, trustworthiness, or both). Throughout the literature review I suggest areas for future research.

AB - I synthesize the extant experimental literature examining auditor evaluation of others' credibility published in six top accounting journals over the last three-and-a-half decades. I adapt the original definition of credibility by Hovland, Janis, and Kelley (1953): the extent of perceiving someone as competent and trustworthy. Audit guidance requires auditors to consider credibility of management, internal auditors, and staff, yet the research literature on auditor evaluation of others' credibility is fragmented and scarce, limiting our understanding of determinants and consequences of auditor evaluations. I develop a framework for analysis of research on auditor evaluation of others' credibility and review extant literature by types of examined effects (determinants of credibility vs. consequences of credibility) and by examined credibility components (competence, trustworthiness, or both). Throughout the literature review I suggest areas for future research.

KW - Consequences of credibility

KW - Determinants of credibility

KW - Evaluation of competence

KW - Evaluation of trustworthiness

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84949035069&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84949035069&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.acclit.2015.10.003

DO - 10.1016/j.acclit.2015.10.003

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84949035069

JO - Journal of Accounting Literature

JF - Journal of Accounting Literature

SN - 0737-4607

ER -