Auditor belief revisions in a performance auditing setting: An application of the belief-adjustment model

Ker-Wei Pei, Sarah A. Reed, Bruce S. Koch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Based upon Hogarth and Einhorn's "belief-adjustment model", the present research tested the model's recency effects prediction in a "performance auditing" context using state auditors. The results showed that the auditors' "belief revisions" were subject to the recency effects predicted by the model. The results also validated an important assumption of the model that serial position effects were absent in a short evidence series. That is, serial position had no effect on the subject's subjective evaluation of evidence. Finally, analyses of the subjects' intermediate belief changes suggested that they displayed a "confirmatory attitude" towards evidence rather than a "disconfirmatory attitude" found in the prior studies conducted in financial auditing contexts.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)169-183
Number of pages15
JournalAccounting, Organizations and Society
Volume17
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1992

Fingerprint

Social Adjustment
auditing
performance
evidence
Research
Auditors
Auditing
Belief revision
evaluation
Recency
Serials

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Accounting
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Information Systems and Management
  • Applied Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Auditor belief revisions in a performance auditing setting : An application of the belief-adjustment model. / Pei, Ker-Wei; Reed, Sarah A.; Koch, Bruce S.

In: Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 17, No. 2, 1992, p. 169-183.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{fc16de525b7d4e26b86cfa388ea5b4a1,
title = "Auditor belief revisions in a performance auditing setting: An application of the belief-adjustment model",
abstract = "Based upon Hogarth and Einhorn's {"}belief-adjustment model{"}, the present research tested the model's recency effects prediction in a {"}performance auditing{"} context using state auditors. The results showed that the auditors' {"}belief revisions{"} were subject to the recency effects predicted by the model. The results also validated an important assumption of the model that serial position effects were absent in a short evidence series. That is, serial position had no effect on the subject's subjective evaluation of evidence. Finally, analyses of the subjects' intermediate belief changes suggested that they displayed a {"}confirmatory attitude{"} towards evidence rather than a {"}disconfirmatory attitude{"} found in the prior studies conducted in financial auditing contexts.",
author = "Ker-Wei Pei and Reed, {Sarah A.} and Koch, {Bruce S.}",
year = "1992",
doi = "10.1016/0361-3682(92)90009-H",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "169--183",
journal = "Accounting, Organizations and Society",
issn = "0361-3682",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Auditor belief revisions in a performance auditing setting

T2 - An application of the belief-adjustment model

AU - Pei, Ker-Wei

AU - Reed, Sarah A.

AU - Koch, Bruce S.

PY - 1992

Y1 - 1992

N2 - Based upon Hogarth and Einhorn's "belief-adjustment model", the present research tested the model's recency effects prediction in a "performance auditing" context using state auditors. The results showed that the auditors' "belief revisions" were subject to the recency effects predicted by the model. The results also validated an important assumption of the model that serial position effects were absent in a short evidence series. That is, serial position had no effect on the subject's subjective evaluation of evidence. Finally, analyses of the subjects' intermediate belief changes suggested that they displayed a "confirmatory attitude" towards evidence rather than a "disconfirmatory attitude" found in the prior studies conducted in financial auditing contexts.

AB - Based upon Hogarth and Einhorn's "belief-adjustment model", the present research tested the model's recency effects prediction in a "performance auditing" context using state auditors. The results showed that the auditors' "belief revisions" were subject to the recency effects predicted by the model. The results also validated an important assumption of the model that serial position effects were absent in a short evidence series. That is, serial position had no effect on the subject's subjective evaluation of evidence. Finally, analyses of the subjects' intermediate belief changes suggested that they displayed a "confirmatory attitude" towards evidence rather than a "disconfirmatory attitude" found in the prior studies conducted in financial auditing contexts.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38249014146&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=38249014146&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0361-3682(92)90009-H

DO - 10.1016/0361-3682(92)90009-H

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:38249014146

VL - 17

SP - 169

EP - 183

JO - Accounting, Organizations and Society

JF - Accounting, Organizations and Society

SN - 0361-3682

IS - 2

ER -