Attributional style in relation to self-esteem and depression: Mediational and interactive models

David R. Pillow, Stephen West, John W. Reich

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In their original statement of the reformulated model of learned helplessness, Abramson, Seligman, and Teasdale (1978) argued that internality is related to depression through self-esteem, whereas stability and globality only have direct relationships with depression. A test of this model using path analysis (N = 289) provided support for the predicted indirect relationship between internality and depression. However, contrary to the model, globality was significantly related to self-esteem, and the relation between stability and depression was not significant. Several models proposing interactions between the attributional style dimensions were also tested; none of the interactions tested attained statistical significance. The methodological and conceptual implications of these findings for the reformulated model of learned helplessness are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)57-69
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Research in Personality
Volume25
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1991

Fingerprint

Self Concept
Learned Helplessness
Depression

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology

Cite this

Attributional style in relation to self-esteem and depression : Mediational and interactive models. / Pillow, David R.; West, Stephen; Reich, John W.

In: Journal of Research in Personality, Vol. 25, No. 1, 1991, p. 57-69.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{99b83e3698684a1a9783e98d1a40e037,
title = "Attributional style in relation to self-esteem and depression: Mediational and interactive models",
abstract = "In their original statement of the reformulated model of learned helplessness, Abramson, Seligman, and Teasdale (1978) argued that internality is related to depression through self-esteem, whereas stability and globality only have direct relationships with depression. A test of this model using path analysis (N = 289) provided support for the predicted indirect relationship between internality and depression. However, contrary to the model, globality was significantly related to self-esteem, and the relation between stability and depression was not significant. Several models proposing interactions between the attributional style dimensions were also tested; none of the interactions tested attained statistical significance. The methodological and conceptual implications of these findings for the reformulated model of learned helplessness are discussed.",
author = "Pillow, {David R.} and Stephen West and Reich, {John W.}",
year = "1991",
doi = "10.1016/0092-6566(91)90005-B",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "57--69",
journal = "Journal of Research in Personality",
issn = "0092-6566",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Attributional style in relation to self-esteem and depression

T2 - Mediational and interactive models

AU - Pillow, David R.

AU - West, Stephen

AU - Reich, John W.

PY - 1991

Y1 - 1991

N2 - In their original statement of the reformulated model of learned helplessness, Abramson, Seligman, and Teasdale (1978) argued that internality is related to depression through self-esteem, whereas stability and globality only have direct relationships with depression. A test of this model using path analysis (N = 289) provided support for the predicted indirect relationship between internality and depression. However, contrary to the model, globality was significantly related to self-esteem, and the relation between stability and depression was not significant. Several models proposing interactions between the attributional style dimensions were also tested; none of the interactions tested attained statistical significance. The methodological and conceptual implications of these findings for the reformulated model of learned helplessness are discussed.

AB - In their original statement of the reformulated model of learned helplessness, Abramson, Seligman, and Teasdale (1978) argued that internality is related to depression through self-esteem, whereas stability and globality only have direct relationships with depression. A test of this model using path analysis (N = 289) provided support for the predicted indirect relationship between internality and depression. However, contrary to the model, globality was significantly related to self-esteem, and the relation between stability and depression was not significant. Several models proposing interactions between the attributional style dimensions were also tested; none of the interactions tested attained statistical significance. The methodological and conceptual implications of these findings for the reformulated model of learned helplessness are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026024446&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026024446&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0092-6566(91)90005-B

DO - 10.1016/0092-6566(91)90005-B

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0026024446

VL - 25

SP - 57

EP - 69

JO - Journal of Research in Personality

JF - Journal of Research in Personality

SN - 0092-6566

IS - 1

ER -