Attitudinal gaps: How experts and lay audiences form policy attitudes toward controversial science

Leona Yi Fan Su, Michael A. Cacciatore, Dominique Brossard, Elizabeth Corley, Dietram A. Scheufele, Michael A. Xenos

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Input from scientific experts and lay audiences plays an important role in the realization of scientific advances and scientific policymaking. This study examines factors influencing expert and public attitudes toward the regulation of academic and commercial nanotechnology. Compared to scientific experts, lay publics are more likely to support the regulation of academic nanotechnology, with value predispositions playing a critical role in impacting such opinions. Among lay audiences, liberals and respondents reporting higher levels of religiosity were more likely to support regulation of both academic and commercial nanotechnology research, while those who paid greater attention to the media were more supportive of regulations for commercial research. Across the two groups, perceptions of risks relative to benefits consistently predicted attitudes toward regulation. Importantly, scientists rely less upon their value predispositions when forming regulatory attitudes, instead basing such attitudes on perceptions of regulatory impacts on scientific progress. The regulatory implications of these findings are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)196-206
Number of pages11
JournalScience and Public Policy
Volume43
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2016

Fingerprint

nanotechnology
expert
regulation
science
group perception
scientific progress
public attitude
Values
policy

Keywords

  • Expert opinion
  • Media attention
  • Nanotechnology regulation
  • Public opinion
  • Risk perceptions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Public Administration
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

Attitudinal gaps : How experts and lay audiences form policy attitudes toward controversial science. / Su, Leona Yi Fan; Cacciatore, Michael A.; Brossard, Dominique; Corley, Elizabeth; Scheufele, Dietram A.; Xenos, Michael A.

In: Science and Public Policy, Vol. 43, No. 2, 01.04.2016, p. 196-206.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Su, Leona Yi Fan ; Cacciatore, Michael A. ; Brossard, Dominique ; Corley, Elizabeth ; Scheufele, Dietram A. ; Xenos, Michael A. / Attitudinal gaps : How experts and lay audiences form policy attitudes toward controversial science. In: Science and Public Policy. 2016 ; Vol. 43, No. 2. pp. 196-206.
@article{6e357c524c944dedb47a115c58709a1e,
title = "Attitudinal gaps: How experts and lay audiences form policy attitudes toward controversial science",
abstract = "Input from scientific experts and lay audiences plays an important role in the realization of scientific advances and scientific policymaking. This study examines factors influencing expert and public attitudes toward the regulation of academic and commercial nanotechnology. Compared to scientific experts, lay publics are more likely to support the regulation of academic nanotechnology, with value predispositions playing a critical role in impacting such opinions. Among lay audiences, liberals and respondents reporting higher levels of religiosity were more likely to support regulation of both academic and commercial nanotechnology research, while those who paid greater attention to the media were more supportive of regulations for commercial research. Across the two groups, perceptions of risks relative to benefits consistently predicted attitudes toward regulation. Importantly, scientists rely less upon their value predispositions when forming regulatory attitudes, instead basing such attitudes on perceptions of regulatory impacts on scientific progress. The regulatory implications of these findings are discussed.",
keywords = "Expert opinion, Media attention, Nanotechnology regulation, Public opinion, Risk perceptions",
author = "Su, {Leona Yi Fan} and Cacciatore, {Michael A.} and Dominique Brossard and Elizabeth Corley and Scheufele, {Dietram A.} and Xenos, {Michael A.}",
year = "2016",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/scipol/scv031",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "196--206",
journal = "Science and Public Policy",
issn = "0302-3427",
publisher = "Beech Tree Publishing",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Attitudinal gaps

T2 - How experts and lay audiences form policy attitudes toward controversial science

AU - Su, Leona Yi Fan

AU - Cacciatore, Michael A.

AU - Brossard, Dominique

AU - Corley, Elizabeth

AU - Scheufele, Dietram A.

AU - Xenos, Michael A.

PY - 2016/4/1

Y1 - 2016/4/1

N2 - Input from scientific experts and lay audiences plays an important role in the realization of scientific advances and scientific policymaking. This study examines factors influencing expert and public attitudes toward the regulation of academic and commercial nanotechnology. Compared to scientific experts, lay publics are more likely to support the regulation of academic nanotechnology, with value predispositions playing a critical role in impacting such opinions. Among lay audiences, liberals and respondents reporting higher levels of religiosity were more likely to support regulation of both academic and commercial nanotechnology research, while those who paid greater attention to the media were more supportive of regulations for commercial research. Across the two groups, perceptions of risks relative to benefits consistently predicted attitudes toward regulation. Importantly, scientists rely less upon their value predispositions when forming regulatory attitudes, instead basing such attitudes on perceptions of regulatory impacts on scientific progress. The regulatory implications of these findings are discussed.

AB - Input from scientific experts and lay audiences plays an important role in the realization of scientific advances and scientific policymaking. This study examines factors influencing expert and public attitudes toward the regulation of academic and commercial nanotechnology. Compared to scientific experts, lay publics are more likely to support the regulation of academic nanotechnology, with value predispositions playing a critical role in impacting such opinions. Among lay audiences, liberals and respondents reporting higher levels of religiosity were more likely to support regulation of both academic and commercial nanotechnology research, while those who paid greater attention to the media were more supportive of regulations for commercial research. Across the two groups, perceptions of risks relative to benefits consistently predicted attitudes toward regulation. Importantly, scientists rely less upon their value predispositions when forming regulatory attitudes, instead basing such attitudes on perceptions of regulatory impacts on scientific progress. The regulatory implications of these findings are discussed.

KW - Expert opinion

KW - Media attention

KW - Nanotechnology regulation

KW - Public opinion

KW - Risk perceptions

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84964699607&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84964699607&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/scipol/scv031

DO - 10.1093/scipol/scv031

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84964699607

VL - 43

SP - 196

EP - 206

JO - Science and Public Policy

JF - Science and Public Policy

SN - 0302-3427

IS - 2

ER -