Attitude Organization and the Attitude-Behavior Relation. A Critique of Bagozzi and Burnkrant's Reanalysis of Fishbein and Ajzen

William R. Dillon, Ajith Kumar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In a 1979 Journal of Personality and Social Psychology article, Bagozzi and Burnkrantreanalyzed data previously reported by Fishbein and Ajzen (1974)on attitude-behavior relations. The purpose of this article is to reexamine the empirical tests reported by these authors concerning the convergent and nomological validity of the multicomponent and single-component models of attitude. Specifically, we demonstrate that: (a) Although Bagozzi and Burnkrant's two-factor model cannot be rejected on the basis of the attitude data alone, there are nevertheless other plausible alternative models that are conceptually consistent with the single-factor, one-component representation of attitude; and (b) when it comes to predicting behavior, however, there is much to be said for the single-factor, one-component model, and Bagozzi and Burnkrant's conclusion about the relative strengths of the affective and cognitive components needs to be reexamined.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)33-46
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Personality and Social Psychology
Volume49
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1985
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

organization
personality psychology
Social Psychology
social psychology
Personality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Social Psychology

Cite this

@article{6b060ea502e7451487b5db8886c68f98,
title = "Attitude Organization and the Attitude-Behavior Relation. A Critique of Bagozzi and Burnkrant's Reanalysis of Fishbein and Ajzen",
abstract = "In a 1979 Journal of Personality and Social Psychology article, Bagozzi and Burnkrantreanalyzed data previously reported by Fishbein and Ajzen (1974)on attitude-behavior relations. The purpose of this article is to reexamine the empirical tests reported by these authors concerning the convergent and nomological validity of the multicomponent and single-component models of attitude. Specifically, we demonstrate that: (a) Although Bagozzi and Burnkrant's two-factor model cannot be rejected on the basis of the attitude data alone, there are nevertheless other plausible alternative models that are conceptually consistent with the single-factor, one-component representation of attitude; and (b) when it comes to predicting behavior, however, there is much to be said for the single-factor, one-component model, and Bagozzi and Burnkrant's conclusion about the relative strengths of the affective and cognitive components needs to be reexamined.",
author = "Dillon, {William R.} and Ajith Kumar",
year = "1985",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1037/0022-3514.49.1.33",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "49",
pages = "33--46",
journal = "Journal of Personality and Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-3514",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Attitude Organization and the Attitude-Behavior Relation. A Critique of Bagozzi and Burnkrant's Reanalysis of Fishbein and Ajzen

AU - Dillon, William R.

AU - Kumar, Ajith

PY - 1985/7

Y1 - 1985/7

N2 - In a 1979 Journal of Personality and Social Psychology article, Bagozzi and Burnkrantreanalyzed data previously reported by Fishbein and Ajzen (1974)on attitude-behavior relations. The purpose of this article is to reexamine the empirical tests reported by these authors concerning the convergent and nomological validity of the multicomponent and single-component models of attitude. Specifically, we demonstrate that: (a) Although Bagozzi and Burnkrant's two-factor model cannot be rejected on the basis of the attitude data alone, there are nevertheless other plausible alternative models that are conceptually consistent with the single-factor, one-component representation of attitude; and (b) when it comes to predicting behavior, however, there is much to be said for the single-factor, one-component model, and Bagozzi and Burnkrant's conclusion about the relative strengths of the affective and cognitive components needs to be reexamined.

AB - In a 1979 Journal of Personality and Social Psychology article, Bagozzi and Burnkrantreanalyzed data previously reported by Fishbein and Ajzen (1974)on attitude-behavior relations. The purpose of this article is to reexamine the empirical tests reported by these authors concerning the convergent and nomological validity of the multicomponent and single-component models of attitude. Specifically, we demonstrate that: (a) Although Bagozzi and Burnkrant's two-factor model cannot be rejected on the basis of the attitude data alone, there are nevertheless other plausible alternative models that are conceptually consistent with the single-factor, one-component representation of attitude; and (b) when it comes to predicting behavior, however, there is much to be said for the single-factor, one-component model, and Bagozzi and Burnkrant's conclusion about the relative strengths of the affective and cognitive components needs to be reexamined.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0006764484&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0006764484&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0022-3514.49.1.33

DO - 10.1037/0022-3514.49.1.33

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0006764484

VL - 49

SP - 33

EP - 46

JO - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

SN - 0022-3514

IS - 1

ER -