Attentional costs and benefits in memory search

Donald Homa, Ian Crain, Ann Marie Miluken, Craig Newton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The role of attentional mechanisms in memory search was investigated in 2 experiments. In Experiment 1, an abrupt-onset cue was a valid or invalid predictor of a spatially displaced memory probe in a memory search paradigm. The 2 conditions differed only in terms of the duration of the memory probe: either 200 ms or an unlimited duration until the subject's response. We found that memory probe duration had little impact on memory search, as revealed by the slope across memory set size, although an invalid prior cue slowed responding by increasing the intercept by about 70 ms. In Experiment 2, costs and benefits of valid and invalid cues were assessed by inclusion of a neutral condition. Both costs and benefits were found, with effects again localized in the intercept of the memory search functions. A simple model was proposed that estimated 2 attentional transit times, 1 to the abrupt-onset cue and 1 activated after disengagement from an invalid location. We address whether the rapid examination of the contents of working memory should be considered an encapsulated process, unperturbed by abrupt-onset events that delay but do not otherwise disturb the resulting search.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)99-110
Number of pages12
JournalAmerican Journal of Psychology
Volume122
Issue number1
StatePublished - Mar 1 2009

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Attentional costs and benefits in memory search'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Homa, D., Crain, I., Miluken, A. M., & Newton, C. (2009). Attentional costs and benefits in memory search. American Journal of Psychology, 122(1), 99-110.