Attention, attitudes, and action: When and why incidental fear increases consumer choice

Nicole Verrochi Coleman, Patti Williams, Andrea Ketcham, Andrew Edward White

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Past research finds that general negativity inherent to a choice set increases deferral. In contrast, we adopt a functional perspective-linking fear to narrowed attention, negative expectations of the future, and an increased readiness for action- and propose that incidental fear increases the likelihood of consumer choice and reduces deferral. Six studies find consistent support for this view, using both hypothetical and consequential choices. We demonstrate that relative to other emotions (disgust, sadness, hope, pride, anger) and general feelings of uncertainty, those experiencing incidental fear choose significantly more and defer less. This increased choice, however, is realized only for decisions made in the present (vs. future), when information about the deferred options is not available. Importantly, increased choice from incidental fear is mediated by increased attention and liking. Moreover, we also demonstrate that individuals with high levels of trait fear (vs. trait anger) are more likely to choose and less likely to defer.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)283-312
Number of pages30
JournalJournal of Consumer Research
Volume44
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2017

Fingerprint

anxiety
anger
emotion
Consumer choice
Consumer Choice
uncertainty
present
Anger

Keywords

  • Choice
  • Deferral
  • Emotion
  • Fear

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Anthropology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Marketing

Cite this

Attention, attitudes, and action : When and why incidental fear increases consumer choice. / Coleman, Nicole Verrochi; Williams, Patti; Ketcham, Andrea; White, Andrew Edward.

In: Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 44, No. 2, 01.08.2017, p. 283-312.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Coleman, Nicole Verrochi ; Williams, Patti ; Ketcham, Andrea ; White, Andrew Edward. / Attention, attitudes, and action : When and why incidental fear increases consumer choice. In: Journal of Consumer Research. 2017 ; Vol. 44, No. 2. pp. 283-312.
@article{3de88f5da9e24ce9b45705a3e01de5dc,
title = "Attention, attitudes, and action: When and why incidental fear increases consumer choice",
abstract = "Past research finds that general negativity inherent to a choice set increases deferral. In contrast, we adopt a functional perspective-linking fear to narrowed attention, negative expectations of the future, and an increased readiness for action- and propose that incidental fear increases the likelihood of consumer choice and reduces deferral. Six studies find consistent support for this view, using both hypothetical and consequential choices. We demonstrate that relative to other emotions (disgust, sadness, hope, pride, anger) and general feelings of uncertainty, those experiencing incidental fear choose significantly more and defer less. This increased choice, however, is realized only for decisions made in the present (vs. future), when information about the deferred options is not available. Importantly, increased choice from incidental fear is mediated by increased attention and liking. Moreover, we also demonstrate that individuals with high levels of trait fear (vs. trait anger) are more likely to choose and less likely to defer.",
keywords = "Choice, Deferral, Emotion, Fear",
author = "Coleman, {Nicole Verrochi} and Patti Williams and Andrea Ketcham and White, {Andrew Edward}",
year = "2017",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/jcr/ucx036",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "44",
pages = "283--312",
journal = "Journal of Consumer Research",
issn = "0093-5301",
publisher = "University of Chicago",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Attention, attitudes, and action

T2 - When and why incidental fear increases consumer choice

AU - Coleman, Nicole Verrochi

AU - Williams, Patti

AU - Ketcham, Andrea

AU - White, Andrew Edward

PY - 2017/8/1

Y1 - 2017/8/1

N2 - Past research finds that general negativity inherent to a choice set increases deferral. In contrast, we adopt a functional perspective-linking fear to narrowed attention, negative expectations of the future, and an increased readiness for action- and propose that incidental fear increases the likelihood of consumer choice and reduces deferral. Six studies find consistent support for this view, using both hypothetical and consequential choices. We demonstrate that relative to other emotions (disgust, sadness, hope, pride, anger) and general feelings of uncertainty, those experiencing incidental fear choose significantly more and defer less. This increased choice, however, is realized only for decisions made in the present (vs. future), when information about the deferred options is not available. Importantly, increased choice from incidental fear is mediated by increased attention and liking. Moreover, we also demonstrate that individuals with high levels of trait fear (vs. trait anger) are more likely to choose and less likely to defer.

AB - Past research finds that general negativity inherent to a choice set increases deferral. In contrast, we adopt a functional perspective-linking fear to narrowed attention, negative expectations of the future, and an increased readiness for action- and propose that incidental fear increases the likelihood of consumer choice and reduces deferral. Six studies find consistent support for this view, using both hypothetical and consequential choices. We demonstrate that relative to other emotions (disgust, sadness, hope, pride, anger) and general feelings of uncertainty, those experiencing incidental fear choose significantly more and defer less. This increased choice, however, is realized only for decisions made in the present (vs. future), when information about the deferred options is not available. Importantly, increased choice from incidental fear is mediated by increased attention and liking. Moreover, we also demonstrate that individuals with high levels of trait fear (vs. trait anger) are more likely to choose and less likely to defer.

KW - Choice

KW - Deferral

KW - Emotion

KW - Fear

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85026458252&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85026458252&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/jcr/ucx036

DO - 10.1093/jcr/ucx036

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85026458252

VL - 44

SP - 283

EP - 312

JO - Journal of Consumer Research

JF - Journal of Consumer Research

SN - 0093-5301

IS - 2

ER -