Assessment Practices and Expert Judgment Methods in Forensic Psychology and Psychiatry: An International Snapshot

Tess M.S. Neal, Thomas Grisso

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

72 Scopus citations

Abstract

We conducted an international survey in which forensic examiners who were members of professional associations described their two most recent forensic evaluations (N = 434 experts, 868 cases), focusing on the use of structured assessment tools to aid expert judgment. This study describes (a) the relative frequency of various forensic referrals, (b) what tools are used globally, (c) frequency and type of structured tools used, and (d) practitioners’ rationales for using/not using tools. We provide general descriptive information for various referrals. We found most evaluations used tools (74.2%) and used several (four, on average). We noted the extreme variety in tools used (286 different tools). We discuss the implications of these findings and provide suggestions for improving the reliability and validity of forensic expert judgment methods. We conclude with a call for an assessment approach that seeks structured decision methods to advance greater efficiency in the use and integration of case-relevant information.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1406-1421
Number of pages16
JournalCriminal Justice and Behavior
Volume41
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 26 2014
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • actuarial
  • decision
  • forensic
  • judgment
  • structure

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Psychology(all)
  • Law

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Assessment Practices and Expert Judgment Methods in Forensic Psychology and Psychiatry: An International Snapshot'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this