Assessment of the uncertainty budget and image resolution of terrestrial laser scans of geomorphic surfaces

Prabin Shilpakar, John S. Oldow, J. Douglas Walker, Kelin Whipple

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Terrestrial laser scanner (TLS) images provide assessment of geomorphic surfaces at a centimeter scale, but for quantitative analysis require an understanding of the uncertainty budget and the limit of image resolution. We conducted two experiments to assess contributions of instrumental, georeferencing, and surface modeling methods to the uncertainty budget and to establish the relation between reference network uncertainty and the repeatability and resolution of imaged natural surfaces. Combinations of Riegl LMS-Z620 and LPM-800HA instruments were used to image fault scarps and erosional ravines in Panamint Valley and the San Gabriel Mountains of California (USA), respectively. In both experiments, a control network of reflectors was surveyed using total station (TS) and georeferenced with the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) in real time kinematic (RTK) and static (S) modes in the first and second experiment, respectively. For successive scans, we tested the impact of using a fixed network of control reflectors and scan positions versus using variable scan positions in a fixed reflector network and variable scan and reflector network configurations. The geometry of the reflector network in both experiments was established using a TS to within ±0.005 m and in addition to ±0.006 m using S-GNSS occupations during the second experiment. TLS repeatability in a local frame is ±0.028 m, with uncertainty increasing to ±0.032 m and ±0.038 m using S-GNSS and RTK-GNSS, respectively. Point-cloud interpolation, where vegetation effects were mitigated, contributed ±0.01 m to the total error budget. We document that the combined uncertainty for the reference network and surface interpolation represents the repeatability of an imaged natural surface.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)281-304
Number of pages24
JournalGeosphere
Volume12
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2016

Fingerprint

image resolution
GNSS
laser
scanner
experiment
interpolation
kinematics
quantitative analysis
occupation
budget
valley
geometry
mountain
vegetation
modeling
station

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geology
  • Stratigraphy

Cite this

Assessment of the uncertainty budget and image resolution of terrestrial laser scans of geomorphic surfaces. / Shilpakar, Prabin; Oldow, John S.; Douglas Walker, J.; Whipple, Kelin.

In: Geosphere, Vol. 12, No. 1, 2016, p. 281-304.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Shilpakar, Prabin ; Oldow, John S. ; Douglas Walker, J. ; Whipple, Kelin. / Assessment of the uncertainty budget and image resolution of terrestrial laser scans of geomorphic surfaces. In: Geosphere. 2016 ; Vol. 12, No. 1. pp. 281-304.
@article{fcf56338755f4df89bacf3d35b8f800c,
title = "Assessment of the uncertainty budget and image resolution of terrestrial laser scans of geomorphic surfaces",
abstract = "Terrestrial laser scanner (TLS) images provide assessment of geomorphic surfaces at a centimeter scale, but for quantitative analysis require an understanding of the uncertainty budget and the limit of image resolution. We conducted two experiments to assess contributions of instrumental, georeferencing, and surface modeling methods to the uncertainty budget and to establish the relation between reference network uncertainty and the repeatability and resolution of imaged natural surfaces. Combinations of Riegl LMS-Z620 and LPM-800HA instruments were used to image fault scarps and erosional ravines in Panamint Valley and the San Gabriel Mountains of California (USA), respectively. In both experiments, a control network of reflectors was surveyed using total station (TS) and georeferenced with the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) in real time kinematic (RTK) and static (S) modes in the first and second experiment, respectively. For successive scans, we tested the impact of using a fixed network of control reflectors and scan positions versus using variable scan positions in a fixed reflector network and variable scan and reflector network configurations. The geometry of the reflector network in both experiments was established using a TS to within ±0.005 m and in addition to ±0.006 m using S-GNSS occupations during the second experiment. TLS repeatability in a local frame is ±0.028 m, with uncertainty increasing to ±0.032 m and ±0.038 m using S-GNSS and RTK-GNSS, respectively. Point-cloud interpolation, where vegetation effects were mitigated, contributed ±0.01 m to the total error budget. We document that the combined uncertainty for the reference network and surface interpolation represents the repeatability of an imaged natural surface.",
author = "Prabin Shilpakar and Oldow, {John S.} and {Douglas Walker}, J. and Kelin Whipple",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1130/GES01113.1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "281--304",
journal = "Geosphere",
issn = "1553-040X",
publisher = "Geological Society of America",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessment of the uncertainty budget and image resolution of terrestrial laser scans of geomorphic surfaces

AU - Shilpakar, Prabin

AU - Oldow, John S.

AU - Douglas Walker, J.

AU - Whipple, Kelin

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Terrestrial laser scanner (TLS) images provide assessment of geomorphic surfaces at a centimeter scale, but for quantitative analysis require an understanding of the uncertainty budget and the limit of image resolution. We conducted two experiments to assess contributions of instrumental, georeferencing, and surface modeling methods to the uncertainty budget and to establish the relation between reference network uncertainty and the repeatability and resolution of imaged natural surfaces. Combinations of Riegl LMS-Z620 and LPM-800HA instruments were used to image fault scarps and erosional ravines in Panamint Valley and the San Gabriel Mountains of California (USA), respectively. In both experiments, a control network of reflectors was surveyed using total station (TS) and georeferenced with the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) in real time kinematic (RTK) and static (S) modes in the first and second experiment, respectively. For successive scans, we tested the impact of using a fixed network of control reflectors and scan positions versus using variable scan positions in a fixed reflector network and variable scan and reflector network configurations. The geometry of the reflector network in both experiments was established using a TS to within ±0.005 m and in addition to ±0.006 m using S-GNSS occupations during the second experiment. TLS repeatability in a local frame is ±0.028 m, with uncertainty increasing to ±0.032 m and ±0.038 m using S-GNSS and RTK-GNSS, respectively. Point-cloud interpolation, where vegetation effects were mitigated, contributed ±0.01 m to the total error budget. We document that the combined uncertainty for the reference network and surface interpolation represents the repeatability of an imaged natural surface.

AB - Terrestrial laser scanner (TLS) images provide assessment of geomorphic surfaces at a centimeter scale, but for quantitative analysis require an understanding of the uncertainty budget and the limit of image resolution. We conducted two experiments to assess contributions of instrumental, georeferencing, and surface modeling methods to the uncertainty budget and to establish the relation between reference network uncertainty and the repeatability and resolution of imaged natural surfaces. Combinations of Riegl LMS-Z620 and LPM-800HA instruments were used to image fault scarps and erosional ravines in Panamint Valley and the San Gabriel Mountains of California (USA), respectively. In both experiments, a control network of reflectors was surveyed using total station (TS) and georeferenced with the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) in real time kinematic (RTK) and static (S) modes in the first and second experiment, respectively. For successive scans, we tested the impact of using a fixed network of control reflectors and scan positions versus using variable scan positions in a fixed reflector network and variable scan and reflector network configurations. The geometry of the reflector network in both experiments was established using a TS to within ±0.005 m and in addition to ±0.006 m using S-GNSS occupations during the second experiment. TLS repeatability in a local frame is ±0.028 m, with uncertainty increasing to ±0.032 m and ±0.038 m using S-GNSS and RTK-GNSS, respectively. Point-cloud interpolation, where vegetation effects were mitigated, contributed ±0.01 m to the total error budget. We document that the combined uncertainty for the reference network and surface interpolation represents the repeatability of an imaged natural surface.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84958253708&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84958253708&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1130/GES01113.1

DO - 10.1130/GES01113.1

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84958253708

VL - 12

SP - 281

EP - 304

JO - Geosphere

JF - Geosphere

SN - 1553-040X

IS - 1

ER -