Assessment of different flexure fatigue failure analysis methods to estimate the number of cycles to failure of asphalt mixtures

M. I. Souliman, W. A. Zeiada, Kamil Kaloush, Michael Mamlouk

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Load associated fatigue cracking is one of the major distress types occurring in flexible pavements. Beam fatigue testing has been used for several decades and is considered an integral part of advanced characterization procedures. However, there have been several fatigue failure analysis methods based on the failure stiffness of the mixture. These methods may not produce the same results, and vary depending on the method of detecting the failure point. In this paper, beam fatigue test results conducted at Arizona State University were used for the analysis. The mixtures included conventional, Asphalt Rubber (AR), and Fiber-Reinforced (Aramid and Polyolefin) asphalt mixtures. Deflection controlled fatigue tests were conducted according to American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO T321) procedure at three temperatures. Paired-t statistical analysis approach was utilized to compare five different fatigue failure methods. These methods are commonly known as the Pronk, Hopman, Carpenter, ASU, and Rowe. An additional method using the Franken fitting model was also introduced. A recommendation is presented to select a potential method that unifies the current fatigue analyses using a rational energy-based approach. This new method provides a well-defined fatigue failure point compared to other methods.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationFour-Point Bending - Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Four-Point Bending
Pages27-34
Number of pages8
StatePublished - 2012
Event3rd Conference on Four-Point Bending - Davis, CA, United States
Duration: Sep 17 2012Sep 18 2012

Other

Other3rd Conference on Four-Point Bending
CountryUnited States
CityDavis, CA
Period9/17/129/18/12

Fingerprint

Asphalt mixtures
Failure analysis
Fatigue of materials
Fatigue testing
Polyolefins
Asphalt
Pavements
Statistical methods
Rubber
Stiffness
Fibers

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Mechanical Engineering

Cite this

Souliman, M. I., Zeiada, W. A., Kaloush, K., & Mamlouk, M. (2012). Assessment of different flexure fatigue failure analysis methods to estimate the number of cycles to failure of asphalt mixtures. In Four-Point Bending - Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Four-Point Bending (pp. 27-34)

Assessment of different flexure fatigue failure analysis methods to estimate the number of cycles to failure of asphalt mixtures. / Souliman, M. I.; Zeiada, W. A.; Kaloush, Kamil; Mamlouk, Michael.

Four-Point Bending - Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Four-Point Bending. 2012. p. 27-34.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Souliman, MI, Zeiada, WA, Kaloush, K & Mamlouk, M 2012, Assessment of different flexure fatigue failure analysis methods to estimate the number of cycles to failure of asphalt mixtures. in Four-Point Bending - Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Four-Point Bending. pp. 27-34, 3rd Conference on Four-Point Bending, Davis, CA, United States, 9/17/12.
Souliman MI, Zeiada WA, Kaloush K, Mamlouk M. Assessment of different flexure fatigue failure analysis methods to estimate the number of cycles to failure of asphalt mixtures. In Four-Point Bending - Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Four-Point Bending. 2012. p. 27-34
Souliman, M. I. ; Zeiada, W. A. ; Kaloush, Kamil ; Mamlouk, Michael. / Assessment of different flexure fatigue failure analysis methods to estimate the number of cycles to failure of asphalt mixtures. Four-Point Bending - Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Four-Point Bending. 2012. pp. 27-34
@inproceedings{bc5c7e7d53dd4ecba382cddf14520aa6,
title = "Assessment of different flexure fatigue failure analysis methods to estimate the number of cycles to failure of asphalt mixtures",
abstract = "Load associated fatigue cracking is one of the major distress types occurring in flexible pavements. Beam fatigue testing has been used for several decades and is considered an integral part of advanced characterization procedures. However, there have been several fatigue failure analysis methods based on the failure stiffness of the mixture. These methods may not produce the same results, and vary depending on the method of detecting the failure point. In this paper, beam fatigue test results conducted at Arizona State University were used for the analysis. The mixtures included conventional, Asphalt Rubber (AR), and Fiber-Reinforced (Aramid and Polyolefin) asphalt mixtures. Deflection controlled fatigue tests were conducted according to American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO T321) procedure at three temperatures. Paired-t statistical analysis approach was utilized to compare five different fatigue failure methods. These methods are commonly known as the Pronk, Hopman, Carpenter, ASU, and Rowe. An additional method using the Franken fitting model was also introduced. A recommendation is presented to select a potential method that unifies the current fatigue analyses using a rational energy-based approach. This new method provides a well-defined fatigue failure point compared to other methods.",
author = "Souliman, {M. I.} and Zeiada, {W. A.} and Kamil Kaloush and Michael Mamlouk",
year = "2012",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780415643313",
pages = "27--34",
booktitle = "Four-Point Bending - Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Four-Point Bending",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Assessment of different flexure fatigue failure analysis methods to estimate the number of cycles to failure of asphalt mixtures

AU - Souliman, M. I.

AU - Zeiada, W. A.

AU - Kaloush, Kamil

AU - Mamlouk, Michael

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Load associated fatigue cracking is one of the major distress types occurring in flexible pavements. Beam fatigue testing has been used for several decades and is considered an integral part of advanced characterization procedures. However, there have been several fatigue failure analysis methods based on the failure stiffness of the mixture. These methods may not produce the same results, and vary depending on the method of detecting the failure point. In this paper, beam fatigue test results conducted at Arizona State University were used for the analysis. The mixtures included conventional, Asphalt Rubber (AR), and Fiber-Reinforced (Aramid and Polyolefin) asphalt mixtures. Deflection controlled fatigue tests were conducted according to American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO T321) procedure at three temperatures. Paired-t statistical analysis approach was utilized to compare five different fatigue failure methods. These methods are commonly known as the Pronk, Hopman, Carpenter, ASU, and Rowe. An additional method using the Franken fitting model was also introduced. A recommendation is presented to select a potential method that unifies the current fatigue analyses using a rational energy-based approach. This new method provides a well-defined fatigue failure point compared to other methods.

AB - Load associated fatigue cracking is one of the major distress types occurring in flexible pavements. Beam fatigue testing has been used for several decades and is considered an integral part of advanced characterization procedures. However, there have been several fatigue failure analysis methods based on the failure stiffness of the mixture. These methods may not produce the same results, and vary depending on the method of detecting the failure point. In this paper, beam fatigue test results conducted at Arizona State University were used for the analysis. The mixtures included conventional, Asphalt Rubber (AR), and Fiber-Reinforced (Aramid and Polyolefin) asphalt mixtures. Deflection controlled fatigue tests were conducted according to American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO T321) procedure at three temperatures. Paired-t statistical analysis approach was utilized to compare five different fatigue failure methods. These methods are commonly known as the Pronk, Hopman, Carpenter, ASU, and Rowe. An additional method using the Franken fitting model was also introduced. A recommendation is presented to select a potential method that unifies the current fatigue analyses using a rational energy-based approach. This new method provides a well-defined fatigue failure point compared to other methods.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84867729808&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84867729808&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:84867729808

SN - 9780415643313

SP - 27

EP - 34

BT - Four-Point Bending - Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Four-Point Bending

ER -