Assessing the environmental, human health, and economic impacts of reprocessed medical devices in a Phoenix hospital's supply chain

Scott Unger, Amy Landis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Given increasing healthcare costs and decreasing insurance reimbursements, healthcare administrators are now assessing innovative opportunities for optimizing their medical device supply chains. Reprocessed medical devices are receiving increased attention because of their twofold reduction to costs associated with reductions to purchase cost of devices and reductions to regulated medical waste (RMW) costs. From an environmental standpoint, an increasing number of studies are assessing the environmental impacts of medical devices and the processes by which they are utilized. These studies report significant environmental impacts with respect to how medical devices are manufactured, used, and disposed. In turn, these studies also discuss the potential human health impacts with respect to medical devices and their associated lifecycles. Despite a wide variety of devices suitable for reprocessing, to date there have been no studies that evaluate the potential economic and environmental benefits of a reprocessed device. Additionally, there have been no hospital-wide environmental and/or economic assessments of reprocessed devices. The aim of this study was to fill these knowledge gaps by using life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle cost assessment (LCCA) to model the environmental and economic impacts of medical device supply chains when varying levels of reprocessed devices are used at Phoenix Baptist Hospital (PBH) in Phoenix, Arizona. The LCA included all cradle-to-grave processes for the seven medical devices. Results of the study showed that if inputs (i.e., ethylene oxide, water, electricity) were optimized, the use of reprocessed devices offers global warming, human health, and economic benefits over the same devices used as disposables. On the other hand, the excessive use of inputs correlated with reprocessed devices having greater overall environmental and human health impacts than disposable medical devices. Additionally, whether used as a SUD (single-use devices) or a reprocessed device, the use of DVT (deep vein thrombosis) compression sleeves corresponded with the highest environmental impacts when devices were compared one-toone. The DVT compression sleeves were comprised of mostly woven cotton; which is a material associated with significant environmental and human health impacts, resulting from its large quantities of lifecycle inputs. This study recommends that the significant proportion of woven cotton in DVT compression sleeves be reduced for a material with less of an overall environmental footprint.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1995-2003
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Cleaner Production
Volume112
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 20 2016

Fingerprint

health impact
economic impact
Supply chains
Health
environmental impact
Economics
Environmental impact
Life cycle
cost
life cycle
compression
Costs
health care
Cotton
cotton
economics
Insurance
Global warming
footprint
ethylene

Keywords

  • Economic savings
  • Environmental impacts
  • Reprocessed medical devices
  • Supply chain
  • Sustainability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

Assessing the environmental, human health, and economic impacts of reprocessed medical devices in a Phoenix hospital's supply chain. / Unger, Scott; Landis, Amy.

In: Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 112, 20.01.2016, p. 1995-2003.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1559c87f927c49e0b0dbd55731c0b1a3,
title = "Assessing the environmental, human health, and economic impacts of reprocessed medical devices in a Phoenix hospital's supply chain",
abstract = "Given increasing healthcare costs and decreasing insurance reimbursements, healthcare administrators are now assessing innovative opportunities for optimizing their medical device supply chains. Reprocessed medical devices are receiving increased attention because of their twofold reduction to costs associated with reductions to purchase cost of devices and reductions to regulated medical waste (RMW) costs. From an environmental standpoint, an increasing number of studies are assessing the environmental impacts of medical devices and the processes by which they are utilized. These studies report significant environmental impacts with respect to how medical devices are manufactured, used, and disposed. In turn, these studies also discuss the potential human health impacts with respect to medical devices and their associated lifecycles. Despite a wide variety of devices suitable for reprocessing, to date there have been no studies that evaluate the potential economic and environmental benefits of a reprocessed device. Additionally, there have been no hospital-wide environmental and/or economic assessments of reprocessed devices. The aim of this study was to fill these knowledge gaps by using life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle cost assessment (LCCA) to model the environmental and economic impacts of medical device supply chains when varying levels of reprocessed devices are used at Phoenix Baptist Hospital (PBH) in Phoenix, Arizona. The LCA included all cradle-to-grave processes for the seven medical devices. Results of the study showed that if inputs (i.e., ethylene oxide, water, electricity) were optimized, the use of reprocessed devices offers global warming, human health, and economic benefits over the same devices used as disposables. On the other hand, the excessive use of inputs correlated with reprocessed devices having greater overall environmental and human health impacts than disposable medical devices. Additionally, whether used as a SUD (single-use devices) or a reprocessed device, the use of DVT (deep vein thrombosis) compression sleeves corresponded with the highest environmental impacts when devices were compared one-toone. The DVT compression sleeves were comprised of mostly woven cotton; which is a material associated with significant environmental and human health impacts, resulting from its large quantities of lifecycle inputs. This study recommends that the significant proportion of woven cotton in DVT compression sleeves be reduced for a material with less of an overall environmental footprint.",
keywords = "Economic savings, Environmental impacts, Reprocessed medical devices, Supply chain, Sustainability",
author = "Scott Unger and Amy Landis",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.144",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "112",
pages = "1995--2003",
journal = "Journal of Cleaner Production",
issn = "0959-6526",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing the environmental, human health, and economic impacts of reprocessed medical devices in a Phoenix hospital's supply chain

AU - Unger, Scott

AU - Landis, Amy

PY - 2016/1/20

Y1 - 2016/1/20

N2 - Given increasing healthcare costs and decreasing insurance reimbursements, healthcare administrators are now assessing innovative opportunities for optimizing their medical device supply chains. Reprocessed medical devices are receiving increased attention because of their twofold reduction to costs associated with reductions to purchase cost of devices and reductions to regulated medical waste (RMW) costs. From an environmental standpoint, an increasing number of studies are assessing the environmental impacts of medical devices and the processes by which they are utilized. These studies report significant environmental impacts with respect to how medical devices are manufactured, used, and disposed. In turn, these studies also discuss the potential human health impacts with respect to medical devices and their associated lifecycles. Despite a wide variety of devices suitable for reprocessing, to date there have been no studies that evaluate the potential economic and environmental benefits of a reprocessed device. Additionally, there have been no hospital-wide environmental and/or economic assessments of reprocessed devices. The aim of this study was to fill these knowledge gaps by using life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle cost assessment (LCCA) to model the environmental and economic impacts of medical device supply chains when varying levels of reprocessed devices are used at Phoenix Baptist Hospital (PBH) in Phoenix, Arizona. The LCA included all cradle-to-grave processes for the seven medical devices. Results of the study showed that if inputs (i.e., ethylene oxide, water, electricity) were optimized, the use of reprocessed devices offers global warming, human health, and economic benefits over the same devices used as disposables. On the other hand, the excessive use of inputs correlated with reprocessed devices having greater overall environmental and human health impacts than disposable medical devices. Additionally, whether used as a SUD (single-use devices) or a reprocessed device, the use of DVT (deep vein thrombosis) compression sleeves corresponded with the highest environmental impacts when devices were compared one-toone. The DVT compression sleeves were comprised of mostly woven cotton; which is a material associated with significant environmental and human health impacts, resulting from its large quantities of lifecycle inputs. This study recommends that the significant proportion of woven cotton in DVT compression sleeves be reduced for a material with less of an overall environmental footprint.

AB - Given increasing healthcare costs and decreasing insurance reimbursements, healthcare administrators are now assessing innovative opportunities for optimizing their medical device supply chains. Reprocessed medical devices are receiving increased attention because of their twofold reduction to costs associated with reductions to purchase cost of devices and reductions to regulated medical waste (RMW) costs. From an environmental standpoint, an increasing number of studies are assessing the environmental impacts of medical devices and the processes by which they are utilized. These studies report significant environmental impacts with respect to how medical devices are manufactured, used, and disposed. In turn, these studies also discuss the potential human health impacts with respect to medical devices and their associated lifecycles. Despite a wide variety of devices suitable for reprocessing, to date there have been no studies that evaluate the potential economic and environmental benefits of a reprocessed device. Additionally, there have been no hospital-wide environmental and/or economic assessments of reprocessed devices. The aim of this study was to fill these knowledge gaps by using life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle cost assessment (LCCA) to model the environmental and economic impacts of medical device supply chains when varying levels of reprocessed devices are used at Phoenix Baptist Hospital (PBH) in Phoenix, Arizona. The LCA included all cradle-to-grave processes for the seven medical devices. Results of the study showed that if inputs (i.e., ethylene oxide, water, electricity) were optimized, the use of reprocessed devices offers global warming, human health, and economic benefits over the same devices used as disposables. On the other hand, the excessive use of inputs correlated with reprocessed devices having greater overall environmental and human health impacts than disposable medical devices. Additionally, whether used as a SUD (single-use devices) or a reprocessed device, the use of DVT (deep vein thrombosis) compression sleeves corresponded with the highest environmental impacts when devices were compared one-toone. The DVT compression sleeves were comprised of mostly woven cotton; which is a material associated with significant environmental and human health impacts, resulting from its large quantities of lifecycle inputs. This study recommends that the significant proportion of woven cotton in DVT compression sleeves be reduced for a material with less of an overall environmental footprint.

KW - Economic savings

KW - Environmental impacts

KW - Reprocessed medical devices

KW - Supply chain

KW - Sustainability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84953306482&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84953306482&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.144

DO - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.144

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84953306482

VL - 112

SP - 1995

EP - 2003

JO - Journal of Cleaner Production

JF - Journal of Cleaner Production

SN - 0959-6526

ER -