Assessing the effectiveness of technology transfer from U.S. government R&D laboratories: impact of market orientation

Barry Bozeman, Karen Coker

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study, based on a national survey of U.S. government laboratories, assesses the degree of success laboratories have had in transferring technology to industry, taking into account the laboratories' differing receptivity to market influences. Three success criteria are considered here, two based on self-evaluations and a third based on the number of technology licenses issued from the laboratory. The two self-evaluations are rooted in different types of effectiveness, `getting technology out the door,' in one case, and, in the other, having a demonstrable commercial impact. A core hypothesis of the study is that the two types of effectiveness will be responsive to different factors and, in particular, the laboratories with a clearer market orientation will have a higher degree of success on the commercial impact and technology license criteria. Overall, the results seem to suggest that multifaceted, multimission laboratories are likely to enjoy the most success in technology transfer, especially if they have relatively low levels of bureaucratization and either ties to industry (particularly direct financial ties) or a commercial orientation in the selection of projects.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationProceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering
Place of PublicationBellingham, WA, United States
PublisherPubl by Int Soc for Optical Engineering
Pages192-205
Number of pages14
Volume1617
ISBN (Print)0819407542
StatePublished - 1992
Externally publishedYes
EventIntl Competitiveness and Business Techniques in Advanced Optics and Imaging - Rochester, NY, USA
Duration: Oct 9 1991Oct 19 1991

Other

OtherIntl Competitiveness and Business Techniques in Advanced Optics and Imaging
CityRochester, NY, USA
Period10/9/9110/19/91

Fingerprint

technology transfer
Technology transfer
industries
evaluation
Industry

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering
  • Condensed Matter Physics

Cite this

Bozeman, B., & Coker, K. (1992). Assessing the effectiveness of technology transfer from U.S. government R&D laboratories: impact of market orientation. In Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering (Vol. 1617, pp. 192-205). Bellingham, WA, United States: Publ by Int Soc for Optical Engineering.

Assessing the effectiveness of technology transfer from U.S. government R&D laboratories : impact of market orientation. / Bozeman, Barry; Coker, Karen.

Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering. Vol. 1617 Bellingham, WA, United States : Publ by Int Soc for Optical Engineering, 1992. p. 192-205.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Bozeman, B & Coker, K 1992, Assessing the effectiveness of technology transfer from U.S. government R&D laboratories: impact of market orientation. in Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering. vol. 1617, Publ by Int Soc for Optical Engineering, Bellingham, WA, United States, pp. 192-205, Intl Competitiveness and Business Techniques in Advanced Optics and Imaging, Rochester, NY, USA, 10/9/91.
Bozeman B, Coker K. Assessing the effectiveness of technology transfer from U.S. government R&D laboratories: impact of market orientation. In Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering. Vol. 1617. Bellingham, WA, United States: Publ by Int Soc for Optical Engineering. 1992. p. 192-205
Bozeman, Barry ; Coker, Karen. / Assessing the effectiveness of technology transfer from U.S. government R&D laboratories : impact of market orientation. Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering. Vol. 1617 Bellingham, WA, United States : Publ by Int Soc for Optical Engineering, 1992. pp. 192-205
@inproceedings{8371c6eaba8b4d4eba6d79c6467bce92,
title = "Assessing the effectiveness of technology transfer from U.S. government R&D laboratories: impact of market orientation",
abstract = "This study, based on a national survey of U.S. government laboratories, assesses the degree of success laboratories have had in transferring technology to industry, taking into account the laboratories' differing receptivity to market influences. Three success criteria are considered here, two based on self-evaluations and a third based on the number of technology licenses issued from the laboratory. The two self-evaluations are rooted in different types of effectiveness, `getting technology out the door,' in one case, and, in the other, having a demonstrable commercial impact. A core hypothesis of the study is that the two types of effectiveness will be responsive to different factors and, in particular, the laboratories with a clearer market orientation will have a higher degree of success on the commercial impact and technology license criteria. Overall, the results seem to suggest that multifaceted, multimission laboratories are likely to enjoy the most success in technology transfer, especially if they have relatively low levels of bureaucratization and either ties to industry (particularly direct financial ties) or a commercial orientation in the selection of projects.",
author = "Barry Bozeman and Karen Coker",
year = "1992",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "0819407542",
volume = "1617",
pages = "192--205",
booktitle = "Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering",
publisher = "Publ by Int Soc for Optical Engineering",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Assessing the effectiveness of technology transfer from U.S. government R&D laboratories

T2 - impact of market orientation

AU - Bozeman, Barry

AU - Coker, Karen

PY - 1992

Y1 - 1992

N2 - This study, based on a national survey of U.S. government laboratories, assesses the degree of success laboratories have had in transferring technology to industry, taking into account the laboratories' differing receptivity to market influences. Three success criteria are considered here, two based on self-evaluations and a third based on the number of technology licenses issued from the laboratory. The two self-evaluations are rooted in different types of effectiveness, `getting technology out the door,' in one case, and, in the other, having a demonstrable commercial impact. A core hypothesis of the study is that the two types of effectiveness will be responsive to different factors and, in particular, the laboratories with a clearer market orientation will have a higher degree of success on the commercial impact and technology license criteria. Overall, the results seem to suggest that multifaceted, multimission laboratories are likely to enjoy the most success in technology transfer, especially if they have relatively low levels of bureaucratization and either ties to industry (particularly direct financial ties) or a commercial orientation in the selection of projects.

AB - This study, based on a national survey of U.S. government laboratories, assesses the degree of success laboratories have had in transferring technology to industry, taking into account the laboratories' differing receptivity to market influences. Three success criteria are considered here, two based on self-evaluations and a third based on the number of technology licenses issued from the laboratory. The two self-evaluations are rooted in different types of effectiveness, `getting technology out the door,' in one case, and, in the other, having a demonstrable commercial impact. A core hypothesis of the study is that the two types of effectiveness will be responsive to different factors and, in particular, the laboratories with a clearer market orientation will have a higher degree of success on the commercial impact and technology license criteria. Overall, the results seem to suggest that multifaceted, multimission laboratories are likely to enjoy the most success in technology transfer, especially if they have relatively low levels of bureaucratization and either ties to industry (particularly direct financial ties) or a commercial orientation in the selection of projects.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026485883&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026485883&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:0026485883

SN - 0819407542

VL - 1617

SP - 192

EP - 205

BT - Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering

PB - Publ by Int Soc for Optical Engineering

CY - Bellingham, WA, United States

ER -