Assessing the effectiveness of different visualizations for judgments of positional uncertainty

Grant McKenzie, Mary Hegarty, Trevor Barrett, Michael Goodchild

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Many techniques have been proposed for visualizing uncertainty in geospatial data. Previous empirical research on the effectiveness of visualizations of geospatial uncertainty has focused primarily on user intuitions rather than objective measures of performance when reasoning under uncertainty. Framed in the context of Google’s blue dot, we examined the effectiveness of four alternative visualizations for representing positional uncertainty when reasoning about self-location data. Our task presents a mobile mapping scenario in which GPS satellite location readings produce location estimates with varying levels of uncertainty. Given a known location and two smartphone estimates of that known location, participants were asked to judge which smartphone produces the better location reading, taking uncertainty into account. We produced visualizations that vary by glyph type (uniform blue circle with border vs. Gaussian fade) and visibility of a centroid dot (visible vs. not visible) to produce the four visualization formats. Participants viewing the uniform blue circle are most likely to respond in accordance with the actual probability density of points sampled from bivariate normal distributions and additionally respond most rapidly. Participants reported a number of simple heuristics on which they based their judgments, and consistency with these heuristics was highly predictive of their judgments.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)221-239
Number of pages19
JournalInternational Journal of Geographical Information Science
Volume30
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

visualization
Visualization
uncertainty
heuristics
Smartphones
visibility
GPS
Normal distribution
intuition
Visibility
search engine
Uncertainty
Global positioning system
empirical research
Satellites
scenario
performance

Keywords

  • heuristics
  • human judgment
  • positioning
  • uncertainty
  • visualization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Information Systems
  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Library and Information Sciences

Cite this

Assessing the effectiveness of different visualizations for judgments of positional uncertainty. / McKenzie, Grant; Hegarty, Mary; Barrett, Trevor; Goodchild, Michael.

In: International Journal of Geographical Information Science, Vol. 30, No. 2, 01.01.2016, p. 221-239.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d18e752bbb06469ba36d845faf85f42c,
title = "Assessing the effectiveness of different visualizations for judgments of positional uncertainty",
abstract = "Many techniques have been proposed for visualizing uncertainty in geospatial data. Previous empirical research on the effectiveness of visualizations of geospatial uncertainty has focused primarily on user intuitions rather than objective measures of performance when reasoning under uncertainty. Framed in the context of Google’s blue dot, we examined the effectiveness of four alternative visualizations for representing positional uncertainty when reasoning about self-location data. Our task presents a mobile mapping scenario in which GPS satellite location readings produce location estimates with varying levels of uncertainty. Given a known location and two smartphone estimates of that known location, participants were asked to judge which smartphone produces the better location reading, taking uncertainty into account. We produced visualizations that vary by glyph type (uniform blue circle with border vs. Gaussian fade) and visibility of a centroid dot (visible vs. not visible) to produce the four visualization formats. Participants viewing the uniform blue circle are most likely to respond in accordance with the actual probability density of points sampled from bivariate normal distributions and additionally respond most rapidly. Participants reported a number of simple heuristics on which they based their judgments, and consistency with these heuristics was highly predictive of their judgments.",
keywords = "heuristics, human judgment, positioning, uncertainty, visualization",
author = "Grant McKenzie and Mary Hegarty and Trevor Barrett and Michael Goodchild",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/13658816.2015.1082566",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "221--239",
journal = "International Journal of Geographical Information Science",
issn = "1365-8816",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing the effectiveness of different visualizations for judgments of positional uncertainty

AU - McKenzie, Grant

AU - Hegarty, Mary

AU - Barrett, Trevor

AU - Goodchild, Michael

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - Many techniques have been proposed for visualizing uncertainty in geospatial data. Previous empirical research on the effectiveness of visualizations of geospatial uncertainty has focused primarily on user intuitions rather than objective measures of performance when reasoning under uncertainty. Framed in the context of Google’s blue dot, we examined the effectiveness of four alternative visualizations for representing positional uncertainty when reasoning about self-location data. Our task presents a mobile mapping scenario in which GPS satellite location readings produce location estimates with varying levels of uncertainty. Given a known location and two smartphone estimates of that known location, participants were asked to judge which smartphone produces the better location reading, taking uncertainty into account. We produced visualizations that vary by glyph type (uniform blue circle with border vs. Gaussian fade) and visibility of a centroid dot (visible vs. not visible) to produce the four visualization formats. Participants viewing the uniform blue circle are most likely to respond in accordance with the actual probability density of points sampled from bivariate normal distributions and additionally respond most rapidly. Participants reported a number of simple heuristics on which they based their judgments, and consistency with these heuristics was highly predictive of their judgments.

AB - Many techniques have been proposed for visualizing uncertainty in geospatial data. Previous empirical research on the effectiveness of visualizations of geospatial uncertainty has focused primarily on user intuitions rather than objective measures of performance when reasoning under uncertainty. Framed in the context of Google’s blue dot, we examined the effectiveness of four alternative visualizations for representing positional uncertainty when reasoning about self-location data. Our task presents a mobile mapping scenario in which GPS satellite location readings produce location estimates with varying levels of uncertainty. Given a known location and two smartphone estimates of that known location, participants were asked to judge which smartphone produces the better location reading, taking uncertainty into account. We produced visualizations that vary by glyph type (uniform blue circle with border vs. Gaussian fade) and visibility of a centroid dot (visible vs. not visible) to produce the four visualization formats. Participants viewing the uniform blue circle are most likely to respond in accordance with the actual probability density of points sampled from bivariate normal distributions and additionally respond most rapidly. Participants reported a number of simple heuristics on which they based their judgments, and consistency with these heuristics was highly predictive of their judgments.

KW - heuristics

KW - human judgment

KW - positioning

KW - uncertainty

KW - visualization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84948078109&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84948078109&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/13658816.2015.1082566

DO - 10.1080/13658816.2015.1082566

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 221

EP - 239

JO - International Journal of Geographical Information Science

JF - International Journal of Geographical Information Science

SN - 1365-8816

IS - 2

ER -