Assessing the accuracy of two proxy measures for BMI in a semi-rural, low-resource setting in Guatemala

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Validation studies of self-reported BMI are limited to populations in high-income countries or urban settings. Here, we assess the accuracy of two proxy measures of measured height, weight and BMI - self-reported values and the Stunkard figure scale - in a semi-rural population in Guatemala.

Methods. Self-reported values and Stunkard figure selection were elicited prior to biometric measurements from a total of 175 non-pregnant women recruited based on a stratified random sample of households, with 92 women providing full data for validation across measures.

Results: 86.3% of participants self-reported weight and 62.3% height. Among those responding, self-reported weight is highly accurate though lower relationships for height contribute to error in reported BMI. The Stunkard scale has a higher response rate (97.1%) and while less accurate in predicting BMI values, more accurately predicts BMI categories.

Conclusions: Self-reported measures are more accurate than the Stunkard scale in estimating BMI values, while the latter is more accurate in estimating BMI categories. High non-response rates and lower correlations between reported and measured height caution against using self-reported biometric data other than raw weight in low-resource settings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number973
JournalBMC Public Health
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 19 2014

Fingerprint

Guatemala
Proxy
Weights and Measures
Validation Studies
Rural Population

Keywords

  • Body mass index
  • Low-income country
  • Obesity
  • Self-report
  • Silhouettes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

@article{e52d33d661594ec2b56e1f57fd2e0878,
title = "Assessing the accuracy of two proxy measures for BMI in a semi-rural, low-resource setting in Guatemala",
abstract = "Background: Validation studies of self-reported BMI are limited to populations in high-income countries or urban settings. Here, we assess the accuracy of two proxy measures of measured height, weight and BMI - self-reported values and the Stunkard figure scale - in a semi-rural population in Guatemala.Methods. Self-reported values and Stunkard figure selection were elicited prior to biometric measurements from a total of 175 non-pregnant women recruited based on a stratified random sample of households, with 92 women providing full data for validation across measures.Results: 86.3{\%} of participants self-reported weight and 62.3{\%} height. Among those responding, self-reported weight is highly accurate though lower relationships for height contribute to error in reported BMI. The Stunkard scale has a higher response rate (97.1{\%}) and while less accurate in predicting BMI values, more accurately predicts BMI categories.Conclusions: Self-reported measures are more accurate than the Stunkard scale in estimating BMI values, while the latter is more accurate in estimating BMI categories. High non-response rates and lower correlations between reported and measured height caution against using self-reported biometric data other than raw weight in low-resource settings.",
keywords = "Body mass index, Low-income country, Obesity, Self-report, Silhouettes",
author = "Jonathan Maupin and Daniel Hruschka",
year = "2014",
month = "9",
day = "19",
doi = "10.1186/1471-2458-14-973",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
journal = "BMC Public Health",
issn = "1471-2458",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing the accuracy of two proxy measures for BMI in a semi-rural, low-resource setting in Guatemala

AU - Maupin, Jonathan

AU - Hruschka, Daniel

PY - 2014/9/19

Y1 - 2014/9/19

N2 - Background: Validation studies of self-reported BMI are limited to populations in high-income countries or urban settings. Here, we assess the accuracy of two proxy measures of measured height, weight and BMI - self-reported values and the Stunkard figure scale - in a semi-rural population in Guatemala.Methods. Self-reported values and Stunkard figure selection were elicited prior to biometric measurements from a total of 175 non-pregnant women recruited based on a stratified random sample of households, with 92 women providing full data for validation across measures.Results: 86.3% of participants self-reported weight and 62.3% height. Among those responding, self-reported weight is highly accurate though lower relationships for height contribute to error in reported BMI. The Stunkard scale has a higher response rate (97.1%) and while less accurate in predicting BMI values, more accurately predicts BMI categories.Conclusions: Self-reported measures are more accurate than the Stunkard scale in estimating BMI values, while the latter is more accurate in estimating BMI categories. High non-response rates and lower correlations between reported and measured height caution against using self-reported biometric data other than raw weight in low-resource settings.

AB - Background: Validation studies of self-reported BMI are limited to populations in high-income countries or urban settings. Here, we assess the accuracy of two proxy measures of measured height, weight and BMI - self-reported values and the Stunkard figure scale - in a semi-rural population in Guatemala.Methods. Self-reported values and Stunkard figure selection were elicited prior to biometric measurements from a total of 175 non-pregnant women recruited based on a stratified random sample of households, with 92 women providing full data for validation across measures.Results: 86.3% of participants self-reported weight and 62.3% height. Among those responding, self-reported weight is highly accurate though lower relationships for height contribute to error in reported BMI. The Stunkard scale has a higher response rate (97.1%) and while less accurate in predicting BMI values, more accurately predicts BMI categories.Conclusions: Self-reported measures are more accurate than the Stunkard scale in estimating BMI values, while the latter is more accurate in estimating BMI categories. High non-response rates and lower correlations between reported and measured height caution against using self-reported biometric data other than raw weight in low-resource settings.

KW - Body mass index

KW - Low-income country

KW - Obesity

KW - Self-report

KW - Silhouettes

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84910682683&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84910682683&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/1471-2458-14-973

DO - 10.1186/1471-2458-14-973

M3 - Article

VL - 14

JO - BMC Public Health

JF - BMC Public Health

SN - 1471-2458

IS - 1

M1 - 973

ER -