Assessing students’ multimodal compositions: an analysis of the literature

Kate T. Anderson, Dani Kachorsky

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Purpose: This article presents an analysis of empirical literature on classroom assessment of students’ multimodal compositions to characterize the field and make recommendations for teachers and researchers. Design/methodology/approach: An interpretive synthesis of the literature related to practices and possibilities for assessing students’ multimodal compositions. Findings: Findings present three overarching types of studies across the body of literature on assessment of student multimodal compositions: reshaping educational practices, promoting multiliteracies approaches to learning and evaluating students’ understanding and competence. These studies’ recommendations range along a continuum of more to less structural changes to “what counts” in classrooms. Research limitations/implications: This review only considers studies published in English from 2000to 2019. Future studies could extend these parameters. Practical implications: This analysis of the literature on assessing student multimodal compositions highlights foundational differences across studies’ purposes and offers guidance for educations seeking to revise their practices, whether their goals are more theoretical/philosophical, oriented toward reshaping classroom practice or focused on ways of measuring student understanding. Social implications: Rethinking assessment can reshape educational practices to be more equitable, more theoretically commensurate with teachers’ beliefs and/or include more thorough and accurate measures of student understanding. Changes to any or all of these facets of educational practices can lead to continued discussion and change regarding the role of multimodal composition in teaching and learning. Originality/value: This study fills a gap in the literature by considering what empirical studies suggest about why, how and what to assess with regard to multimodal compositions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)312-334
Number of pages23
JournalEnglish Teaching
Volume18
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 14 2019

Fingerprint

educational practice
student
classroom
teacher
literature
structural change
learning
Education
methodology
Teaching
Values
education
Guidance
Empirical Study
Teacher Beliefs
Methodology
Classroom Practice
Multiliteracies
Originality
Structural Change

Keywords

  • Assessment
  • Composition
  • English teaching
  • Multiliteracies
  • Multimodality
  • New literacies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

Assessing students’ multimodal compositions : an analysis of the literature. / Anderson, Kate T.; Kachorsky, Dani.

In: English Teaching, Vol. 18, No. 3, 14.10.2019, p. 312-334.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{cf17f55d04884c7490d0e9dcf1778711,
title = "Assessing students’ multimodal compositions: an analysis of the literature",
abstract = "Purpose: This article presents an analysis of empirical literature on classroom assessment of students’ multimodal compositions to characterize the field and make recommendations for teachers and researchers. Design/methodology/approach: An interpretive synthesis of the literature related to practices and possibilities for assessing students’ multimodal compositions. Findings: Findings present three overarching types of studies across the body of literature on assessment of student multimodal compositions: reshaping educational practices, promoting multiliteracies approaches to learning and evaluating students’ understanding and competence. These studies’ recommendations range along a continuum of more to less structural changes to “what counts” in classrooms. Research limitations/implications: This review only considers studies published in English from 2000to 2019. Future studies could extend these parameters. Practical implications: This analysis of the literature on assessing student multimodal compositions highlights foundational differences across studies’ purposes and offers guidance for educations seeking to revise their practices, whether their goals are more theoretical/philosophical, oriented toward reshaping classroom practice or focused on ways of measuring student understanding. Social implications: Rethinking assessment can reshape educational practices to be more equitable, more theoretically commensurate with teachers’ beliefs and/or include more thorough and accurate measures of student understanding. Changes to any or all of these facets of educational practices can lead to continued discussion and change regarding the role of multimodal composition in teaching and learning. Originality/value: This study fills a gap in the literature by considering what empirical studies suggest about why, how and what to assess with regard to multimodal compositions.",
keywords = "Assessment, Composition, English teaching, Multiliteracies, Multimodality, New literacies",
author = "Anderson, {Kate T.} and Dani Kachorsky",
year = "2019",
month = "10",
day = "14",
doi = "10.1108/ETPC-11-2018-0092",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "312--334",
journal = "English Teaching",
issn = "1175-8708",
publisher = "University of Waikato",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing students’ multimodal compositions

T2 - an analysis of the literature

AU - Anderson, Kate T.

AU - Kachorsky, Dani

PY - 2019/10/14

Y1 - 2019/10/14

N2 - Purpose: This article presents an analysis of empirical literature on classroom assessment of students’ multimodal compositions to characterize the field and make recommendations for teachers and researchers. Design/methodology/approach: An interpretive synthesis of the literature related to practices and possibilities for assessing students’ multimodal compositions. Findings: Findings present three overarching types of studies across the body of literature on assessment of student multimodal compositions: reshaping educational practices, promoting multiliteracies approaches to learning and evaluating students’ understanding and competence. These studies’ recommendations range along a continuum of more to less structural changes to “what counts” in classrooms. Research limitations/implications: This review only considers studies published in English from 2000to 2019. Future studies could extend these parameters. Practical implications: This analysis of the literature on assessing student multimodal compositions highlights foundational differences across studies’ purposes and offers guidance for educations seeking to revise their practices, whether their goals are more theoretical/philosophical, oriented toward reshaping classroom practice or focused on ways of measuring student understanding. Social implications: Rethinking assessment can reshape educational practices to be more equitable, more theoretically commensurate with teachers’ beliefs and/or include more thorough and accurate measures of student understanding. Changes to any or all of these facets of educational practices can lead to continued discussion and change regarding the role of multimodal composition in teaching and learning. Originality/value: This study fills a gap in the literature by considering what empirical studies suggest about why, how and what to assess with regard to multimodal compositions.

AB - Purpose: This article presents an analysis of empirical literature on classroom assessment of students’ multimodal compositions to characterize the field and make recommendations for teachers and researchers. Design/methodology/approach: An interpretive synthesis of the literature related to practices and possibilities for assessing students’ multimodal compositions. Findings: Findings present three overarching types of studies across the body of literature on assessment of student multimodal compositions: reshaping educational practices, promoting multiliteracies approaches to learning and evaluating students’ understanding and competence. These studies’ recommendations range along a continuum of more to less structural changes to “what counts” in classrooms. Research limitations/implications: This review only considers studies published in English from 2000to 2019. Future studies could extend these parameters. Practical implications: This analysis of the literature on assessing student multimodal compositions highlights foundational differences across studies’ purposes and offers guidance for educations seeking to revise their practices, whether their goals are more theoretical/philosophical, oriented toward reshaping classroom practice or focused on ways of measuring student understanding. Social implications: Rethinking assessment can reshape educational practices to be more equitable, more theoretically commensurate with teachers’ beliefs and/or include more thorough and accurate measures of student understanding. Changes to any or all of these facets of educational practices can lead to continued discussion and change regarding the role of multimodal composition in teaching and learning. Originality/value: This study fills a gap in the literature by considering what empirical studies suggest about why, how and what to assess with regard to multimodal compositions.

KW - Assessment

KW - Composition

KW - English teaching

KW - Multiliteracies

KW - Multimodality

KW - New literacies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073613563&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85073613563&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/ETPC-11-2018-0092

DO - 10.1108/ETPC-11-2018-0092

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85073613563

VL - 18

SP - 312

EP - 334

JO - English Teaching

JF - English Teaching

SN - 1175-8708

IS - 3

ER -